Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Financing of Corporate Investment:Panel Data Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Firms


Affiliations
1 Department of Commerce, Lakshmibai College, University of Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The significance of financing variables in determining corporate investment has been of substantial interest for researchers. With market imperfections being a reality, it is necessary for the firms to consider various financing options while making investment decisions. The objective of this paper is to empirically evaluate the importance of various sources of finance in determining the investment equation in manufacturing firms from public and private sector in India. Accelerator- cash flow model has been used as the basic model of analysis with output and internal funds to be the most significant factors explaining investment in Indian corporate sector. Panel data model with balanced dataset has been estimated for a sample of 176 large sized Indian companies for fourteen-year period. Apart from change in output and cash flow from operating activities, the investment equation also includes change in inventory, flow of equity, and flow of borrowings along with lagged investment and lagged change in output as independent variables. Though inclusion of cash flows as an explanatory variable in capital expenditure equation has both theoretical and empirical support, the positive sign of equity is postulated to study the impact of financial sector reforms post nineties which were aimed at broadening of equity market by removing control over capital issues and pricing. There is evidence that accelerator theory of investment plays a determining role in firm’s fixed investment behavior as change in output (both, current and lagged) has been found to be statistically significant. Both internal and external sources of finance have been dynamically affecting investment with flow of borrowings being a highly significant variable indicating the predominant role of banks and other development financial institutions in Indian financial system apart from debentures raised from public at large. In a response to this, changes in corporate financing pattern have been observed with a movement towards greater equity financing. Finally, change in output, cash flows, flow of equity and borrowings have been statistically significant in determining corporate investment.

Keywords

Corporate Investment, Cash Flows, Equity, Borrowed Funds, Accelerator Theory.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Modigliani, F., and Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American economic review, 261-297.

  • Donaldson, G. (1961). Corporate debt capacity.

  • McCabe, G. M. (1979). The empirical relationship between investment and financing: a new look. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 14(01), 119-135.

  • Myers, S. C., and Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information those investors do not have. Journal of financial economics, 13(2), 187-221.

  • Mayer, C. (1988). New issues in corporate finance. European Economic Review, 32(5), 1167-1183.

  • Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., Petersen, B. C., Blinder, A. S., and Poterba, J. M. (1988). Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1988(1), 141-206.

  • Kaplan, S. N., and Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169-215.

  • Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2), 323-329.

  • Bernanke, B., and Gertler, M. (1989). Agency costs, net worth, and business fluctuations. The American Economic Review, 14-31.

  • Grunfeld, Y. (1958). The Determinants of Corporate Investment: A Study of a Number of Large Corporations in the United States. Department of Photo duplication, University of Chicago Library.

  • Eisner, R. (1967). A permanent income theory for investment: some empirical explorations. The American Economic Review, 363-390.

  • Eisner, R. (1978). Factors in business investment. Ballinger Publishing Company

  • Bagchi, A. K. (1962). Investment by Privately Owned Joint Stock Companies in India. Arthaniti (July). (as cited in Sarkar, D. (1970). Capital Formation in Indian Industries: An Empirical Application of Investment Theories. Economic and Political Weekly, M29-M38.)

  • Sarkar, D. (1970). Capital Formation in Indian Industries: An Empirical Application of Investment Theories. Economic and Political Weekly, M29-M38.

  • Jorgenson, D. W. (1963). Capital theory and investment behavior. The American Economic Review, 53(2), 247-259.

  • Dixit, M. R. (1976). Role of Corporation Tax Policy in the Fixed Asset Investment Behaviour of Large Private Corporations in India—A Micro Econometric Study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. (as cited in Krishnamurty, K., and Sastry, D. U. (1975). Investment and Financing in the Corporate Sector in India (No. 18). Tata McGraw-Hill Pub. Co.)

  • Clark, P. K., Greenspan, A., Goldfield, S. M., and Clark, P. (1979). Investment in the 1970s: Theory, performance, and prediction. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1979(1), 73-124.

  • Gangopadhyay, S., Lensink, R., and van der Molen, R. (2002). Business groups, financing constraints, and investment: the case of India. University of Groningen.

  • Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., and Scharfstein, D. (1991). Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: Evidence from Japanese industrial groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(1), 33-60.

  • Oliner, S. D., and Rudebusch, G. D. (1992). Sources of the financing hierarchy for business investment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 643-654.

  • Athey, M. J., and Laumas, P. S. (1994). Internal funds and corporate investment in India. Journal of Development Economics, 45(2), 287-303. doi:10.1016/0304-3878(94)90034-5 22. Cleary, S. (1999). The relationship between firm investment and financial status. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 673-692.

  • Athukorala, P. C., and Sen, K. (2003). Liberalization and business investment in India. Indian Economic Reforms, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Bhattacharyya, S. (2007). Determinants of Private Corporate Investment: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Firms. Proceedings of the Northeast Business and Economics Association.

  • Jorgenson, D. W., and Siebert, C. D. (1968). A comparison of alternative theories of corporate investment behavior. The American Economic Review, 681-712.

  • Whited, T. M. (1992). Debt, liquidity constraints, and corporate investment: Evidence from panel data. The Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1425-1460.

  • Krishnamurty, K., and Sastry, D. U. (1975). Investment and Financing in the Corporate Sector in India (No. 18). Tata McGraw-Hill Pub. Co.

  • Ganesh-Kumar, A., Sen, K., and Vaidya, R. (2001). Outward orientation, investment and finance constraints: A study of Indian firms. Journal of Development Studies, 37(4), 133-149.

  • Nair, V. R. (2004). Financial Liberalization and Determinants of Investment: An Enquiry into Indian Private corporate Manufacturing Sector.

  • Dalip, S., and Rao, V. G. (1974). The flow of funds in Indian manufacturing sector (No. WP1974-01-01_00097). Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.

  • Rao, T. V. S. R., and Mishra, G. D. (1976). Investment Financing in the Corporate Sector. Indian Economic Journal, 23(4), 311-318.

  • Devereux, M., and Schiantarelli, F. (1990). Investment, financial factors, and cash flow: Evidence from UK panel data. In Asymmetric information, corporate finance, and investment (pp. 279-306). University of Chicago Press.

  • Calomiris, C.W., and Hubbard, R.G. (1995). Internal Finance and Investment: Evidence from the Undistributed Profits Tax of 1936-37. The Journal of Business, 68(4), 443. doi: 10.1086/296673

  • Goergen, M., and Renneboog, L. (2001). Investment policy, internal financing and ownership concentration in the UK. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 257-284.

  • Galizia, F., and O'Brien, D. (2001). Do capital expenditures determine debt issues? (No. 2001/02). Economic and financial reports/European Investment Bank.

  • Bruinshoofd, A. (2003). Corporate investment and financing constraints: Connections with cash management.

  • La Cava, G. (2005). Financial Constraints, the User Cost of Capital and Corporate Investment in Australia. Research Discussion Paper (2005-12). Economic Analysis. Reserve Bank of Australia.

  • Pruitt, S. W., and Gitman, L. J. (1991). The interactions between the investment, financing, and dividend decisions of major US firms. Financial review, 26(3), 409-430.

  • Estrada, A, and Valles, J. (1998). Investment and financial structure in Spanish manufacturing firms. Investigaciones Economicas, 22(3), 337-360.


Abstract Views: 204

PDF Views: 0




  • Financing of Corporate Investment:Panel Data Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Firms

Abstract Views: 204  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sucheta Gauba
Department of Commerce, Lakshmibai College, University of Delhi, India

Abstract


The significance of financing variables in determining corporate investment has been of substantial interest for researchers. With market imperfections being a reality, it is necessary for the firms to consider various financing options while making investment decisions. The objective of this paper is to empirically evaluate the importance of various sources of finance in determining the investment equation in manufacturing firms from public and private sector in India. Accelerator- cash flow model has been used as the basic model of analysis with output and internal funds to be the most significant factors explaining investment in Indian corporate sector. Panel data model with balanced dataset has been estimated for a sample of 176 large sized Indian companies for fourteen-year period. Apart from change in output and cash flow from operating activities, the investment equation also includes change in inventory, flow of equity, and flow of borrowings along with lagged investment and lagged change in output as independent variables. Though inclusion of cash flows as an explanatory variable in capital expenditure equation has both theoretical and empirical support, the positive sign of equity is postulated to study the impact of financial sector reforms post nineties which were aimed at broadening of equity market by removing control over capital issues and pricing. There is evidence that accelerator theory of investment plays a determining role in firm’s fixed investment behavior as change in output (both, current and lagged) has been found to be statistically significant. Both internal and external sources of finance have been dynamically affecting investment with flow of borrowings being a highly significant variable indicating the predominant role of banks and other development financial institutions in Indian financial system apart from debentures raised from public at large. In a response to this, changes in corporate financing pattern have been observed with a movement towards greater equity financing. Finally, change in output, cash flows, flow of equity and borrowings have been statistically significant in determining corporate investment.

Keywords


Corporate Investment, Cash Flows, Equity, Borrowed Funds, Accelerator Theory.

References