Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Organizational Culture Analysis:A Study of Selected Government and Private Universities of Haryana


Affiliations
1 University School of Management, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra – 136119, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Organizational culture plays a prominent role in institution building. A shared and strong culture gains loyalty and trust from employees. On the contrary, a weak culture lowers the morale of employees and hinders the firm performance. The study is an attempt to investigate dominant culture in government governed and private owned universities of Haryana identifying preferred culture by employees. A comparative analysis is also conducted to compare the cultures of government and private owned universities. For the same competing values framework has been employed that identifies dominant culture type in universities out of: Clan, Adhocracy, Market and Hierarchy culture types. For analysing the data standard scoring of the administered instrument and Z-test have been applied. The study reports the prevalence of hierarchy culture in government universities while clan culture dominates in private universities. The results indicate that government owned universities are structured and bureaucratic organizations with a set of established rules and procedures having a stable leadership focussing more on efficiency whereas private universities came out to be friendly places to work with focus on human development and gaining trust of employees through mentoring and participation. Study also reveals that there exists a significant difference between prevailing and preferred culture in both type of organizations.

Keywords

Organizational Culture:Competing Values Framework, Clan, Adhocracy, Hierarchy.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Kroeber A L and Kluckhohn C. Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Harvard University .1952.

  • Hofstede G . Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Sage, Beverly Hills, California.1980.

  • Keesing R M . Theories of Culture. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1974; 3: 73-97.

  • Chatman J A and Jehn K A. Assessing the Relationship Between Industry Characteristics and Organizational Culture: How Different Can You Be? Academy of Management Journal. 1994;37(3): 522-553.

  • Hofstede G. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Sage, Beverly Hills, California. 1980.

  • Schein E H. Organizational Culture and Leadership.Jossey- Bass, San Francisco. 2004.

  • Cameron K S and Quinn R E . Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture Based on Competing Values Framework.Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc, New York. 1999.

  • Gordon G G and DiTomaso N. Predicting Corporate Performance from Organizational Culture. Journal of Management Studies .1992; 29(6): 783-798.

  • Kotter J P and Heskett J L . Corporate Culture and Performance. Free Press, California. 1992.

  • Uddin M J et al. Impact of Organizational Culture on Employee Performance and Productivity: A Case Study of Telecommunication Sector in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management. 2013;8(2): 63-77.

  • Taber T D and Seashore S E. Job Satisfaction and Their Correlations. American Behaviour and Scientists. 1975; 18(3): 346-356.

  • Peters T J and Waterman R H. In Search of Excellence.Harper and Row, New York. 1982.

  • Schein E H. Coming to a New Awareness of Organizational Culture. Sloan Management Review. 1984; 25(2):3-16.

  • Kuh G D and Whitt E J. The Invisible Tapestry: Cultures in American Colleges and Universities. Association for the Study of Higher Education, Washington D.C. 1988.

  • Williams R. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Oxford University Press, USA.1985.

  • Cameron K S and Ettington D R. The Conceptual Foundation of Organizational Culture. Division of Research School of Business Administration,Michigan. 1988.

  • Schneider B. Organizational Climate and Culture. Jossey- Bass, San Francisco. 1990.

  • Hofstede G. Cultures and Organizations: Software of Mind. McGraw-Hill, London.1991.

  • Schein E H. Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey- Bass, San Francisco. 2004.

  • Day G S. The Capabilities of Market- Driven Organizations. Journal of Marketing. 1994; 58 (4): 37-52.

  • Deal T E and Kennedy A A. Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Addison-Wesley,Boston.1982.

  • Jarnagin C and Slocum J W. Creating Corporate Cultures through Mythopoeic Leadership. Organizational Dynamics. 2007; 36(3): 288-302.

  • Barney J B. Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? The Academy of Management Review.1986; 1(3): 656-665.

  • Sporn B. Managing University Culture: An Analysis of Relationship Between Institutional Culture and Management Approaches. Higher Education. 1999; 32: 41-61.

  • Cohen D W. Understanding the Globalization of Scholarship. In M. W. Peterson, D. D. Dill, and L. A. Mets, Planning and Management for a Changing Environment: A Handbook on Redesigning Postsecondary Institutions. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. 1997; pp. 548-562.

  • Hofstede G and Bond M H . The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth. Organizational Dynamics. 1988; 16(4): 4-21.

  • Sporn B. Towards More Adaptive Universities: Trends of Institutional Reform in Europe. Higher Education in Europe. 1999; 24(1): 23-33.

  • Denison D R. Organizational culture: Can it be a key lever for driving organizational change. In S. Cartwright and C. Cooper (Eds.),The handbook of organizational culture. John Wiley and Sons: London. 2000.

  • Schein E H. Organizational Culture and Leadership.Jossey- Bass, San Francisco.2004.

  • Pearce J A and Robinson R B. Strategic Management- Strategy Formulation and Implementation. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston. 2004.

  • Deal T E and Peterson K D. Shaping School Culture: Pitfalls, Paradoxes and Promises. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. 2009.

  • Fralinger B and Olson V. Organizational Culture at the University Level: A Study of OCAI Instrument. Journal of College Teaching and Learning. 2007; 4(11):85-97.

  • Taber T D and Seashore S E . Job Satisfaction and Their Correlations. American Behaviour and Scientists. 1975; 18: 346-356.

  • Salonda L L. Exploration of a University Culture: A Papaua New Guinea Case Study. Victoria University of Technology. 2008 35. Amos E A and Weathington B L. An Analysis of the Relation Between Employee Organization Value Congruence and Employee Attitudes. The Journal of Psychology. 2008; 142(6):615-631.

  • Raduan C R, Kumar N, Haslinda A and Ling G Y. Organizational Culture as a Root of Performance Improvement: Research and Recommendations. Contemporary Management Research. 2008; 4(1): 43-56.

  • Catanzaro D, Moore H and Marshall T R . The Impact of Organizational Culture on Attraction and Recruitment of Job Applicants. Journal of Business Psychology. 2010; 25(4): 649-662.

  • Sabri P S, Ilyas M and Amjad Z. Organizational Culture and Its Impact on Job Satisfaction of the University Teachers of Lahore. International Journal of Business and Social Science .2011; 24(2):121-128.

  • Kashyap V, Vohra P and Kaur T. Comparative Analysis of Organizational Culture: The Empirical Study of IT Organizations in the Region of Mohali (Punjab, India). International Journal of Management and Business Studies. 2012;2(3):60-64.

  • Awadh A M and Saad A M. Impact of Organizational Culture on Employee Performance. International Review of Management and Business Research .2013; 2(1):168-175.

  • Acar A Z and Acar P. Organizational Culture Types and Their Effects on Organizational Performance in Turkish Hospitals. Emerging Markets Journal . 2014; 3(3): 18-31.

  • SezginO. Exploring the Relationship between the Concepts of Organizational Culture, Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour. 2009.Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Yeditepe University.

  • Smart J C and John E P. Organizational Culture and Effectiveness in Higher Education: A Test of the Culture Type and Strong Culture Hypothesis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1996; 18(3):291-241..


Abstract Views: 270

PDF Views: 0




  • Organizational Culture Analysis:A Study of Selected Government and Private Universities of Haryana

Abstract Views: 270  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Simmi Arora
University School of Management, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra – 136119, India
Apoorva Singh
University School of Management, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra – 136119, India

Abstract


Organizational culture plays a prominent role in institution building. A shared and strong culture gains loyalty and trust from employees. On the contrary, a weak culture lowers the morale of employees and hinders the firm performance. The study is an attempt to investigate dominant culture in government governed and private owned universities of Haryana identifying preferred culture by employees. A comparative analysis is also conducted to compare the cultures of government and private owned universities. For the same competing values framework has been employed that identifies dominant culture type in universities out of: Clan, Adhocracy, Market and Hierarchy culture types. For analysing the data standard scoring of the administered instrument and Z-test have been applied. The study reports the prevalence of hierarchy culture in government universities while clan culture dominates in private universities. The results indicate that government owned universities are structured and bureaucratic organizations with a set of established rules and procedures having a stable leadership focussing more on efficiency whereas private universities came out to be friendly places to work with focus on human development and gaining trust of employees through mentoring and participation. Study also reveals that there exists a significant difference between prevailing and preferred culture in both type of organizations.

Keywords


Organizational Culture:Competing Values Framework, Clan, Adhocracy, Hierarchy.

References