Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Analysis of Factors Promoting the Usage of Electronic National Agriculture Market in Rajasthan, India


Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
2 Institute of Agricultural Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
 

Information and communication technology (ICT) can improve the value and supply chain for agriculture. The post-harvest value chain is still extensive in India, and farmers frequently do not get a reasonable share of the profit. Despite greater procurement by the state and federal Government agencies as well as players in the private sector, the vast majority of farmers continue to get the short end of the stick. The present study focuses on the factors promoting the usage of the electronic National Agriculture Market (e-NAM) in Rajasthan, India. The significant P-values in KMO and Bartlett’s test indicate that researchers can proceed with the factor analysis. Using principal component analysis, it was found that the well-known functionalities of e-NAM included virtual highlights, capacity-building amenities, e-bidding design features, value-addition modules and e-logistics features, which encouraged stakeholders to sell their products across the Indian states using digital platforms in order to achieve higher prices compared to traditional markets. The supply chain has been shortened due to e-NAM, which connects the physical markets of multiple states on a virtual stage using ICT.

Keywords

Agriculture, Electronic Market, Factor Analysis, Information and Communication Technology, Principal Component Analysis.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aker, J. C., Ghosh, I. and Burrell, J., The promise (and pitfalls) of ICT for agriculture initiatives. Agric. Econ., 2016, 47(S1), 35–48.

  • WB, ICT in Agriculture: Connecting Smallholders to Knowledge, Networks, and Institutions, World Bank, Washington DC, USA, 2011.

  • FAO, Information and communication technology (ICT) in agriculture: a report to the G20 agricultural deputies, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 2017.

  • Saini, S. and Jirli, B., Extent of utilization of information and communication technology (ICT) in the agricultural marketing by farmers and traders in Tonk and Dausa Districts of Rajasthan. J. Commun. Mobil. Sustain. Dev., 2022, 17, 153–157.

  • Singh, N. K. and Alagawadi, M., Awareness of farmers and traders towards benefits of electronic National Agriculture Market (e-NAM). J. Res. ANGRAU, 2021, 49(2), 119–125.

  • Singh, L., Goyal, M. and Bansal, A., Progress and performance of national agriculture market (e-NAM) in Punjab. Indian J. Econ. Dev., 2022, 18(3), 707–713.

  • Jirli, B. and Saini, S., Can India become Atmanirbhar without e-mediation in agricultural education. J. Farm Sci., 2021, 34(5), 470–475.

  • GoI, National agriculture market dashboard at Small Farmers Agri-Business Consortium (SFAC). Department of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India, 2023; https://enam.gov.in/web/dashboard/stakeholder-data (retrieved on 15 February 2023).

  • IAMAI, India Digital Summit 2021 to Bring Ecosystem Stalwarts on One Platform, Internet and Mobile Association of India, New Delhi, India, 2021.

  • GoI, BharatNet, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India, 2021; https://bharatnet.gov.in/ (retrieved on 19 December 2022).

  • The Economic Times, Reliance Jio to Provide Free Digital Literacy to 1.5 crore Farmers, Students, 22 August 2019.

  • Child, D., The Essentials of Factor Analysis, Bloomsbury Academic, London, UK, 2006, 3rd edn.

  • Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R. and Sullivan, J. J., Making Sense of Factor Analysis, SAGE Publications, Inc, USA, 2003.

  • Thompson, B., Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.

  • Henson, R. K. and Roberts, J. K., Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 2006, 66(3), 393–416.

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C., Multi-variate Data Analysis, Prentice-Hall, NJ, USA, 1995.

  • Burton, L. J. and Mazerolle, S. M., Survey instrument validity part I: principles of survey instrument development and validation in athletic training education research. Athl. Train. Educ. J., 2011, 6(1), 27–35.

  • Kaiser, H., The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 1960, 20, 141–151.

  • Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O. and Sharma, S., Designing and conducting studies to develop a scale. In Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications, Sage Publications, USA, 2003, pp. 115–143.

  • Gorsuch, R. L., Exploratory factor analysis: its role in item analysis. J. Pers. Assess, 1997, 68(3), 532–560.

  • Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G. and Scarpello, V., Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: a tutorial on parallel analysis. Organ Res. Meth., 2004, 7(2), 191–205.

  • Zwick, W. R. and Velicer, W. F., Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychol. Bull., 1986, 99, 432–442.

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. and Strahan, E. J., Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol. Meth., 1999, 4, 272–299.

  • Cattell, R. B., The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav. Res., 1996, 1(2), 245–276.

  • Markets and Markets, IoT in Agriculture Market by Offering, Application, and Geography – Global Forecast to 2025, New Delhi, India, 2021.

  • Jha, K., Doshi, A., Patel, P. and Shah, M., A comprehensive review on automation in agriculture using artificial intelligence. Artifi. Intell. Agric., 2019, 2, 1–12.

  • GoI, e-NAM: revolutionizing Agriculture Marketing, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India, 2020.

  • Chand, R., e-Platform for national agricultural market. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2016, 51(28), 15–18.

  • Chand, R. and Saxena, R., Agriculture: intentions and actions. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2014, 49(31), 30–34.

  • e-NAM: Driving Agriculture Prosperity, National Institution for Transforming India, New Delhi, 2018.

  • Bisena, J. and Kumar, R., Agricultural marketing reforms and e-national agricultural market (e-NAM) in India: a review. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2018, 31, 167–176.

  • Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, Impact of e-NAM on agricultural markets and farmers’ income in India, New Delhi, India, 2019.

  • Naidu, Y. G., Globalisation and its impact on Indian society. Indian J. Polit. Sci., 2006, 67(1), 65–76.

  • Akanchha, S. and Jirli, B., Changing perception and awareness towards ICT along with changing roles of stakeholders in agriculture. Res. J. Agric. Sci., 2018, 9(6), 1412–1416.

  • Sekhara, C., Nuthalapati, R., Bhatt, Y. and Beero, S. K., Electronic national agricultural market (e-NAM) A review of performance and prospects. Institute for Social and Economic, New Delhi, India, 2020.

  • FAO, The State of Food and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 2021.

  • WB, Agriculture and Rural Development, World Bank, Washington DC, USA, 2020.


Abstract Views: 71

PDF Views: 53




  • Analysis of Factors Promoting the Usage of Electronic National Agriculture Market in Rajasthan, India

Abstract Views: 71  |  PDF Views: 53

Authors

Sushmita Saini
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
Basavaprabhu Jirli
Institute of Agricultural Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
Smruti Ranjan Padhan
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India

Abstract


Information and communication technology (ICT) can improve the value and supply chain for agriculture. The post-harvest value chain is still extensive in India, and farmers frequently do not get a reasonable share of the profit. Despite greater procurement by the state and federal Government agencies as well as players in the private sector, the vast majority of farmers continue to get the short end of the stick. The present study focuses on the factors promoting the usage of the electronic National Agriculture Market (e-NAM) in Rajasthan, India. The significant P-values in KMO and Bartlett’s test indicate that researchers can proceed with the factor analysis. Using principal component analysis, it was found that the well-known functionalities of e-NAM included virtual highlights, capacity-building amenities, e-bidding design features, value-addition modules and e-logistics features, which encouraged stakeholders to sell their products across the Indian states using digital platforms in order to achieve higher prices compared to traditional markets. The supply chain has been shortened due to e-NAM, which connects the physical markets of multiple states on a virtual stage using ICT.

Keywords


Agriculture, Electronic Market, Factor Analysis, Information and Communication Technology, Principal Component Analysis.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv125%2Fi6%2F643-648