Open Access
Subscription Access
A Metrics Ecosystem for Designing Quality e-Commerce Systems
E-commerce has become a prime channel for doing commerce both globally and locally. It has gained the trust of buyers worldwide not only because of the supporting technologies but for the ever-increasing quality of service provided by most vendors as well. Quality is and will be a competitive advantage in e-commerce as competition on an international scale increases. Designing quality e-commerce software is one battle that needs to be won in this war and tools such as formal standards are key weapons. In this paper an eco-system of software quality metrics is presented based on the ISO25010 standard. These metrics are mapped to quality characteristics of the software and to facets of user-system interaction so as to provide designers and developers insights and guidelines on how produce quality e-commerce systems. A representative set of 29 new metrics for the quality characteristics of Functional Suitability and Usability is presented.
Keywords
E-Commerce, Software Design, Software Quality, Metrics, ISO25010.
User
Font Size
Information
- Chen, L. and Holsapple, C.W. (2013) “E-business adoption research: state of the art”. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 14, No. 3.
- Lee I., and Lee, I. (2013). Trends in E-Business, E-Services, and E-Commerce: Impact of Technology on Goods, Services, and Busines’s Transactions (1st ed.). IGI Global, Hershey, PA, USA.
- Zhu, Y. & Yan, Z. (2016). “A Survey on Trust Evaluation in E-commerce”. In Proceedings of the 9th EAI International Conference on Mobile Multimedia Communications (MobiMedia '16). ICST, Brussels, Belgium, Belgium, pp. 130-139.
- Turban, E., King, D., Lee, J.K, Liang, T.P. and Turban, D.B (2015). Electronic Commerce A Managerial and Social Networks Perspective. Springer.
- Heidrich J. et al. (2014). "Model-based quality management of software development projects". Software Project Management in a Changing World, Springer, pp. 125-156.
- Goldfarb, A., Greenstein, S.M. and Tucker, C.E. (2015). Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy. University of Chicago Press
- Puspaningrum, A., Siti R. & Akbar J. (2017). “Functional Suitability Measurement using Goal-Oriented Approach based on ISO/IEC 25010 for Academics Information System”. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence. Vol.3. No. 68.
- Stefani A., Xenos M. (2009). “Meta-metric Evaluation of E-Commerce-related Metrics”. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci., Vol. 233, pp. 59-72.
- ISO9000. International Organisation for Standardisation. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=42180.
- ISO 8402. Quality management and quality assurance. ISO Organisation. https://www.iso.org/standard/20115.html
- ISO 25010: Software engineering -- Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) -- Measurement reference model and guide. ISO, Switzerland.
- Garvin, D.A. (1984). “What does product quality really mean?”. Sloane Management Review, pp. 25-43.
- Bevan, N. & Azuma, M. (1997). “Quality in Use: Incorporating Human Factors into the Software Engineering Lifecycle”. 3rd international Software Engineering Standards Symposium (ISESS '97), 169.
- ISO 14598 (2001). Software engineering — Product evaluation — Part 6: Documentation of evaluation modules. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:14598:-6:ed-1:v1:en
- Fenton, N., Pfleeger S.L. (1997). Software Metrics A Rigorous & Practical Approach. Thomson Computer Press.
- Bevan, N. (2014). “How you could benefit from using ISO standards”. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1037-1038.
- Glass, R.L. (2007). “A research project with important practitioner-oriented findings”. Com. of the ACM, Vol. 50, No. 11, pp. 15-16.
- Al-Kilidar, H., Cox, K., Kitchenham, B. (2005). “The use and usefulness of the ISO/IEC 9126 quality standard”. 2005 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering.
- Nakai, H., Tsuda, N., Honda, K., Washizaki, H., Fukazawa, Y. (2016). "A SQuaRE-based software quality evaluation framework and its case study". Region 10 Conference (TENCON) 2016 IEEE, pp. 3704-3707, ISSN 2159-3450.
- Mohanty, R.P., Seth, D., Mukadam , S. (2010). “Quality Dimensions of E-Commerce and their Implications”. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 219-247.
- Carrillo, A.B., Mateo, P. R. and Monje, M. R. (2012). "Metrics to evaluate functional quality: A systematic review" .7th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI 2012), Madrid, 2012, pp. 1-6.
- Rodriguez, M, Oviedo, J.R., Piattini, M. (2016). “Evaluation of software product functional suitability: A case study”. Software Quality Professional, Vol 18, No 3, pp. 18-29.
- Forsgren, N. and Kersten, M. (2018) “ DevOps metrics:. Commun. ACM, Vol. 61, No 4, pp.44-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3159169
- Gordieiev O., Kharchenko V., Fominykh N., Sklyar V. (2014) “Evolution of Software Quality Models in Context of the Standard ISO 25010”. In: Zamojski W., Mazurkiewicz J., Sugier J., Walkowiak T., Kacprzyk J. (eds), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Dependability and Complex Systems DepCoS-RELCOMEX. June 30 – July 4, 2014, Brunów, Poland. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol 286. Springer.
- Abran, A. (2010). Software Metrics and Software Metrology. Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Pr.
- Lalmas, M. and Hong, L. (2018) “Tutorial on Metrics of User Engagement: Applications to News, Search and E-Commerce”. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 781-782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3162010
Abstract Views: 564
PDF Views: 190