International Journal of Information Studies & Libraries

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Quantitative Analysis of Quality Research Output in the Field of Physics : A Bibliometric Evaluation of Literature in Bahrain and Kuwait


Affiliations
1 King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
2 College of Design, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study compares research productivity in physics in Bahrain and Kuwait, as indexed in the Web of Science database during 2011-2020. Scientometric indices, such as the yearly research growth, type of research, prolific author, most impactful source, productive institutions, and most cited country and documents, portray the different dimensions. It was examined that during 2011-2020, there was a substantial increase in the yearly output of physics literature in Bahrain and Kuwait. The study reveals that the literature in physics is gradually increasing, and there is an upwards trend. The year 2019 was the leading year for contributions from Bahrain (78 papers) as well as Kuwait (272 papers). Coincidently, Bououdina M (189 papers) was the most prolific author in both Bahrain and Kuwait. ‘Optic’ (24 papers) was the most productive source for Bahrain, while it was ‘AIP Conference Proceedings’ (54 papers) for Kuwait. X-Ray Diffraction (84) was the most researched title topic in Bahrain, while it was Nano Fluidics (132) for Kuwait. Single author collaboration for Bahrain was 69, while it was 160 for Kuwait; documents per author collaboration for Bahrain was 0.513 and was 0.233 for Kuwait; and authors per documents collaboration for Bahrain was 1.95 and for Kuwait was 4.3. However, the research trends specify a greater scope for higher research in physics in Bahrain and Kuwait.

Keywords

Scientometric, Physics, Bahrain, Kuwait, Research Output, Source Impact, Author Impact.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2019). Bibliometrix 3.0. Retrieved from https://www.bibliometrix.org/about.html. https://www.bibliometrix.org/index.html

  • Dabas, B., & Kumar, S. (2017). Contributions by women faculties of physics from select institutions of Delhi: A scientometrics study. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 37(6), 410-416. doi:https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.37.6.11713

  • Clarivate Analytics. (2020). Journal citation reports. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/

  • Dabas, B., & Kumar, S. (2018). Research output of Indian women scientists in the field of physics and astronomy: A scientometrics study. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2018. Retrieved from https://www2.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85057449276&partnerID=40&md5=74f337d83ff67 440ad0a99a2e1f95ee3

  • Dadkhah, M., Lagzian, M., Rahimnia, F., & Kimiafar, K. (2020). What do publications say about the internet of things challenges/barriers to uninformed authors? A bibliometric analysis. JLIS.It, 11(3), 77-98. doi:https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12634

  • Fang, Y., Yin, J., & Wu, B. (2018). Climate change and tourism: A scientometric analysis using CiteSpace. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(1), 108-126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1329310

  • Khanna, S., Singh, N. K., Tewari, D., & Saini, H. S. (2017). Scientometric analysis of the research output of physics and astronomy of Guru Nanak Dev University during 2006-15. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 37(5), 337-345. doi:https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.37.10683

  • Mryglod, O. (2018). Scientometric analysis of condensed matter physics journal. Condensed Matter Physics, 21(2), 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.5488/CMP.21.22801

  • Panda, S. (2020). A meta-analysis of scholarly research on corona virus through big data approach. International Journal of Research in Library Science, 6(2), 66-83. doi:https://doi.org/10.26761/IJRLS.6.2.2020.1339

  • Rahaman, M. S., Ansari, K. M. N., & Al attas, H. H. (2021). Saudi Arabian research output on big data publications using the Scopus database: A scientometric study. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-18. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4429/

  • Rahaman, M. S., Kumar, S., Ansari, K. M. N., & Rahman, M. R. (2021). Twenty-five years of global research publications trends of novel coronavirus: A scientometrics assessment. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-17. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4294/

  • Ramy, A., Floody, J., Ragab, M. A. F., & Arisha, A. (2018). A scientometric analysis of knowledge management research and practice literature: 2003-2015. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 16(1), 66-77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2017.1405776

  • van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOS viewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3


Abstract Views: 124

PDF Views: 0




  • Quantitative Analysis of Quality Research Output in the Field of Physics : A Bibliometric Evaluation of Literature in Bahrain and Kuwait

Abstract Views: 124  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Safiqur Rahaman
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
Khadeeja M. N. Ansari
College of Design, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

Abstract


The present study compares research productivity in physics in Bahrain and Kuwait, as indexed in the Web of Science database during 2011-2020. Scientometric indices, such as the yearly research growth, type of research, prolific author, most impactful source, productive institutions, and most cited country and documents, portray the different dimensions. It was examined that during 2011-2020, there was a substantial increase in the yearly output of physics literature in Bahrain and Kuwait. The study reveals that the literature in physics is gradually increasing, and there is an upwards trend. The year 2019 was the leading year for contributions from Bahrain (78 papers) as well as Kuwait (272 papers). Coincidently, Bououdina M (189 papers) was the most prolific author in both Bahrain and Kuwait. ‘Optic’ (24 papers) was the most productive source for Bahrain, while it was ‘AIP Conference Proceedings’ (54 papers) for Kuwait. X-Ray Diffraction (84) was the most researched title topic in Bahrain, while it was Nano Fluidics (132) for Kuwait. Single author collaboration for Bahrain was 69, while it was 160 for Kuwait; documents per author collaboration for Bahrain was 0.513 and was 0.233 for Kuwait; and authors per documents collaboration for Bahrain was 1.95 and for Kuwait was 4.3. However, the research trends specify a greater scope for higher research in physics in Bahrain and Kuwait.

Keywords


Scientometric, Physics, Bahrain, Kuwait, Research Output, Source Impact, Author Impact.

References