International Journal of Agricultural Engineering

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Performance of Tractor Operated Two Row Sugarcane Cutter Planter for Sugarcane Planting in Andhra Pradesh State, India


Affiliations
1 Regional Agricultural Research Station (A.N.G.R.A.U.), Anakapalle, Hyderabad (Telangana), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Sugarcane is an important agro-industrial crop requiring more labour force for planting. Presently, in traditional cultivation of sugarcane, all the operations are being done manually or semi mechanized stage, 60 per cent of the cost incurred towards labour charges. Sugarcane planting involves cutting of setts, opening of furrows, placing the setts in furrows and covering the setts with soil which is tedious, time consuming process and labour intensive. Introduction of mechanized planter will perform all these operations simultaneously and reduce dependency on labour and complete the farm operations in time. A field experiment was conducted at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle, Andhra Pradesh to evaluate the performance of tractor mounted two row sugarcane cutter planter. The field capacity of the equipment was found to be 0.16 ha/h. The biometric parameters viz., diameter of the cane, height of the cane and yield of mechanically planted sugarcane was on par with the manually planted sugarcane where as single cane weight and ischolar_main spread area were found to be significantly different (p<0.05). Similarly, the juice quality of mechanically planted sugarcane in terms of degree Brix, sucrose per cent was on par with conventionally planted sugarcane. Economic analysis revealed that cost of planting with sugarcane cutter planter was Rs.15,400 per ha as against Rs. 6750 with traditional method of planting. The saving in labour cost, seed quantity and planting time with sugarcane cutter planter were to the tune of 51 per cent, 68 per cent and 58 per cent, respectively compared to conventional method of planting.

Keywords

Sugarcane Cutter Planter, Traditional Planting, Labour Cost.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Agriculture Statistics at a Glance (2016). Government of India, ministry of agriculture and farmers welfare, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare Directorate of Economics and Statistics. www.agricoop.nic.in; http://eands.dacnet.nic.in (14 August, 2017).

  • Anonymous (1983). Regional network for agricultural machinery RNAM Test codes and procedures for farm machinery. Technical series no.12, 219: Bangkok, Thailand.

  • Anonymous (2001). Productivity constraints. The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture. pp.97-102.

  • Anonymous (2003). Microsoft office professional Edition 2003. Microsoft Office excel, One Microsoft way, Redmond, WA 98052-6399, USA: Microsoft, Inc.

  • Anonymous ( 2016). Indian Sugar. The Complete Sugar J., 66 (12) : 40-45.

  • Bahl, V.P. and Sharma, T.R. (2001). Present status and sciope of tractor drawn automatic lister sugarcane planter in haryana. Paper presented at annual convention of ISAE held at Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar (Odisha) India.

  • Bahri, A. and Bansal, R.K. (1992). Evaluation of different combination of openers and press wheels for no-till seedlings. In: Tillage in arid and semi-arid areas, Seminar on Agricultural Engineering, Rabat Marocco,1(3) : 2270.

  • Baker, C. (1983). Some developmemts in direct drilling equipment in New Zealand. Agric.Mech. Africa & Latin America., 14 (4) : 25-30.

  • Barnes, P.L. and Maddux, L.D. (1991). Tillage system effects on soil physical properties. American. Soci. Agril. Engg., No.91-2627, 19p.

  • Bernacki, H., Aman, J. and Kanafojski, C.Z. (1972). Agriculture machines, theory and construction. National technical Information service, Warsaw:203-205.

  • Choudhary, A.D., Baker, C.J. and Springett, J.A. (1990). Direct drilling (no–till) opener design specification and soil micro and environmental factors to influence barley seedling establishment in a wet soil- In: International Congress on Mechanization And energy in agric. Conference, Adana, Turkey at October 1-4, 1990.pp.201-211.

  • Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Singapore: John Wiley and Sons, 2nd Ed., 680p.

  • Kumar, M. and Tripati, A. (2015). To study of the different modes of tillage for the performance of sugarcane cutter planter. Inernat. Res. J. Engg. Tech., 2(3): 1416-1425.

  • Mukunda Rao, Ch, Applala Swamy, A., Veerabhadra Rao, K. and Venugopala Rao, N. (2017). Identification of sugarcane clones suitable for rainfed cultivation. Proc. Ann Conv SISSTA, 47: 59-62.

  • Murali, P. and Balakrishnan, R. (2012). Labour scarcity and selective mechanization of sugarcane agriculture in Tamil Nadu, India. Sugar Tech., 14(3):223-228.

  • Naik, Ravindra, Annamalai, S.J.K., Vijayan Nair, N. and Rajendra Prasad, N. (2013). Studies on mechanization of planting of sugarcane budchip settings raised in pro trays. Sugar Tech., 15(1): 27-35.

  • Patil, A., Dave, A.K. and Yadav, R.N.S. (2004). Evaluation of sugarcane cutter planter. Sugar Tech., 6 (3):121-125.

  • Quasrani, A.R., Chen, B.C. and Farooq, M.A. (1992). Development of modified AMRI sugarcane planter. In Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development Proceeding of Conference held in Beijing China, October 12-14

  • Srivastava, A.C. (1995). Design and development of sugarcane planter with tillage disc. Appl. Engg. Agric., 11(3): 335–341.

  • Stevens, G.N. (1982). Equipment testing and evaluation. Wrest park, Silsoe, Bedford, England : National Institute of Agricultural Engineering.154 p.

  • Vijayan Nair, N. (2012). Sugarcane Agriculture in India- 100 years and beyond, 53. In Abstracts of background papers on SBI-Indian Sugar Industry. National Interactive workshop. June 26-27, 2012. Coimbatore. India: Sugarcane Breeding Institute.

  • Yadav, R.N.S., Sharma, M.P., Kamthe, S.D., Tajuddin,A., Yadav Sandeep and Tejra Raj Kumar (2001). Performance evaluation of sugarcane chopper harvester. Sugar Tech., (3&4): 17-122.

  • Yadav, R.N.S., Yadav, S. and Tejra, R.K. (2003). Labour saving and cost reduction machinery for sugarcane cultivation. Sugar Tech., 5 (1 & 2): 7-10.


Abstract Views: 264

PDF Views: 0




  • Performance of Tractor Operated Two Row Sugarcane Cutter Planter for Sugarcane Planting in Andhra Pradesh State, India

Abstract Views: 264  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

P. Sreedevi
Regional Agricultural Research Station (A.N.G.R.A.U.), Anakapalle, Hyderabad (Telangana), India
P. V. K. Jagannadha Rao
Regional Agricultural Research Station (A.N.G.R.A.U.), Anakapalle, Hyderabad (Telangana), India

Abstract


Sugarcane is an important agro-industrial crop requiring more labour force for planting. Presently, in traditional cultivation of sugarcane, all the operations are being done manually or semi mechanized stage, 60 per cent of the cost incurred towards labour charges. Sugarcane planting involves cutting of setts, opening of furrows, placing the setts in furrows and covering the setts with soil which is tedious, time consuming process and labour intensive. Introduction of mechanized planter will perform all these operations simultaneously and reduce dependency on labour and complete the farm operations in time. A field experiment was conducted at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle, Andhra Pradesh to evaluate the performance of tractor mounted two row sugarcane cutter planter. The field capacity of the equipment was found to be 0.16 ha/h. The biometric parameters viz., diameter of the cane, height of the cane and yield of mechanically planted sugarcane was on par with the manually planted sugarcane where as single cane weight and ischolar_main spread area were found to be significantly different (p<0.05). Similarly, the juice quality of mechanically planted sugarcane in terms of degree Brix, sucrose per cent was on par with conventionally planted sugarcane. Economic analysis revealed that cost of planting with sugarcane cutter planter was Rs.15,400 per ha as against Rs. 6750 with traditional method of planting. The saving in labour cost, seed quantity and planting time with sugarcane cutter planter were to the tune of 51 per cent, 68 per cent and 58 per cent, respectively compared to conventional method of planting.

Keywords


Sugarcane Cutter Planter, Traditional Planting, Labour Cost.

References