International Journal of Agricultural Engineering

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Field Evaluation of Self Propelled Reaper Cum Binder Through Front Line Demonstration in Wheat Crop in Indore District of Madhya Pradesh


Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kasturbagram, Indore (M.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Field performance of self propelled reaper cum binder was assessed in wheat crop and compared with manual method of harvesting by sickle at farmer’s field under the front line demonstration during Rabi 2015-16 and 2016-17 in the village Ramukhedi, Setkhedi, Khudel and Naharkheda at 20 farmers field. The effective field capacity of the self propelled reaper cum binder was found 0.253 ha h-1with a field efficiency of 59.18 per cent at an average operating speed of 3.5 kmph compared to 0.025 ha ha-1for manual harvesting. The fuel consumption was found 4.97 l ha-1. Labour requirements for mechanical and manual harvesting were 19.97 and 192 man-h ha-1, respectively. The harvesting losses for mechanical and manual harvesting were 69.37 and 68.04 kg ha-1, respectively. The cost of harvesting operation was Rs.9882/ha for manual harvesting and Rs. 2962/ha for mechanical harvesting. The harvesting cost of self propelled reaper cum binder was reduced by 70.02 per cent compared to manual harvesting method with sickle.

Keywords

Wheat, Self Propelled Reaper Cum Binder, Harvesting, Manual Harvesting.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Chavan, P.B., Patil, D.K. and Dhondge, D.S. (2015). Design and development of manually operated reaper. IOSR J. Mechanical & Civil Engg. (IOSR-JMCE), 12(3) : 15-22

  • Duraisamy, V.M., Senthilkumar, T. and Subbalakshmi, S. (2011). Studies on standardization of spacing and transplanting depth for a self- propelled rice transplanter. Agril. Mechanization Asia, Africa & Latin America, 42 (1): 42-44.

  • Hasanjani, H., Hoseyni, M., Khademolhoseyni, N. and Alizadeh, M.R. (2007). Evaluation of various methods of harvesting rice in Gilan. J. Agric., 9 (1): 23-38.

  • Manjunatha, M.V., Masthana Reddy, B.G., Shashidhar, S.D. and Joshi, V.R. (2009). Field performance evaluation of vertical conveyor paddy reaper. Karnataka J. Agic.Sci., 22(1):140142

  • Mohammad Reza Alizadeh, Iraj bagheru and Mir Hussein Payman (2007). Evaluation of a rice reaper used for rapeseed harvesting. American-Eurasan J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 2(4): 388-394.

  • Michael, A.M. and Ojha, T.P. (1987). Principles of Agricultural Engineering, 1. ML Jain for Jain Brothers, New Dehli, India.

  • Nadeem Amjad (1983). Field performance evaluation of rice reaper. Agril. Mechanization Asia, Africa & Latin America, 14: 35-40.

  • Jaya Prakash, R., Ashwin Kumar, B., Aravind Reddy, G. and Rami Reddy, K.V.S. (2015). Performance evaluation of reaperbinder in rice crop. Internat. J. Agric. Engg., 8(2) : 232-238.

  • Singh, Sukhbir, Vatsa, D.K. and Verma, M.K. (2007). Feasibility and performance evaluation of power tiller operated reaper in hills of Himachal Pradesh. Agril. Engg. Today, 31(2): 6-10.


Abstract Views: 250

PDF Views: 0




  • Field Evaluation of Self Propelled Reaper Cum Binder Through Front Line Demonstration in Wheat Crop in Indore District of Madhya Pradesh

Abstract Views: 250  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Jitendra Singh
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kasturbagram, Indore (M.P.), India

Abstract


Field performance of self propelled reaper cum binder was assessed in wheat crop and compared with manual method of harvesting by sickle at farmer’s field under the front line demonstration during Rabi 2015-16 and 2016-17 in the village Ramukhedi, Setkhedi, Khudel and Naharkheda at 20 farmers field. The effective field capacity of the self propelled reaper cum binder was found 0.253 ha h-1with a field efficiency of 59.18 per cent at an average operating speed of 3.5 kmph compared to 0.025 ha ha-1for manual harvesting. The fuel consumption was found 4.97 l ha-1. Labour requirements for mechanical and manual harvesting were 19.97 and 192 man-h ha-1, respectively. The harvesting losses for mechanical and manual harvesting were 69.37 and 68.04 kg ha-1, respectively. The cost of harvesting operation was Rs.9882/ha for manual harvesting and Rs. 2962/ha for mechanical harvesting. The harvesting cost of self propelled reaper cum binder was reduced by 70.02 per cent compared to manual harvesting method with sickle.

Keywords


Wheat, Self Propelled Reaper Cum Binder, Harvesting, Manual Harvesting.

References