International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Yield and Economics of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) Influenced by Mulching, Spacing and Intercropping with Green Gram (Vigna radiata)


Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bathinda (Punjab), India
2 Government Brijindra College, Faridkot (Punjab), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


An experiment was conducted during Kharif season of 2011-12 to study from results concluded that maximum fresh rhizome yield of 210.0 q/ha obtained where turmeric sown as sole (T2) and it was at par with T11 where green gram was intercropped. The maximum net return (Rs. 1,46,942) per hectare was obtained in T11 (30 cm inter row spacing) and it was followed by T10 (Rs. 1,16,080) when turmeric and green gram (37.5 cm inter row spacing in turmeric) intercropping with mulching. Mulching produced higher net return Rs. 1, 25,125 in turmeric sole with mulching as compared with Rs. 1,08,720 in turmeric sole without mulching. Highest B:C ratio 3.91 obtained in (T2) turmeric sole with mulching than (T1) turmeric sole without mulching. B:C ratio 3.44 obtained in T11 (where green gram was sown in between turmeric rows) and it was closely followed the 3.91 and 3.58 with and without mulching. Mulching increase the B:C ratio as compared to unmulched treatment. Higher turmeric equivalent yield (253.3 q ha-1) obtained in T11 (where intercropping of green gram in between turmeric rows at 30 cm inter row spacing). Mulch application increases the land equivalent ratio as compared to without mulching. Higher LER (2.0) was obtained in T11 (where 30 cm inter row spacing in turmeric) and it was followed by T9, T7, T8, T10, T5, T6, T3, T4, T2 treatments.

Keywords

Turmeric, Mulching, Economics, B:C Ratio, Returns.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Cohly, H.H.P., Asad, Das S.K., Angel, M.F. and Rao, M. (2003). Effect of antioxidant (Turmeric, Turmerin and Curcumin) on human immune deficiency viruses. Internat. J. Mol. Sci., 4 : 22-23.

  • Kandiannan, K. and Chandaragir, K.K. (2006). Influence of varieties, dates of planting, spacing and nitrogen levels on growth, yield and quality of turmeric. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 76 (7) : 432-434.

  • Kapoor, L.D. (1990).Handbook of ayurvedic medicinal plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 185.

  • Kuttan, R., Bhanumathy, P., Nirmala, K. and George, M.C. (1985). Potential anticancer activity of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Cancer Lett., 29 : 197-202.

  • Mahfuza, S.N., Islam, M.N., Hannan, A., Akhteruzzaman, M. and Begum, S. (2012). Intercropping different vegetables and spices with pointed gourd. J. Expt. Biosci., 3 (1): 77-82.

  • Manhas, S.S., Gill, B.S., Khajuria, V. and Kumar, S. (2011). Effect of planting material. Mulch and farmyard manure on weed density, rhizome yield and quality of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Indian J. Agron., 56 (4) : 393-399.

  • Moghe, S.M., Zakiuddin, K.S. and Arajpure, V.G. (2012). Design and development of turmeric polishing machine. Internat. J. Engg. Res., 2 (6): 4710-4713.

  • Sanyal, D. and Dhar, P.P. (2008). Effects of mulching, nitrogen and potassium levels on growth, yield and quality of turmeric grown in red lateritic soils. Acta Hort.,769 : 137-140.

  • Silva, N.F., Sonnenberg, P.E. and Borges, J.D. (2004). Growth and production of turmeric as a result of mineral fertilizer and planting of density. Hort. Brasileria, 22:61-65.

  • Singh, J. (1983). The effect of N, P, K and intercropping on the growth, yield and quality of turmeric. Ph.D. Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, PUNJAB (INDIA).

  • Singh, R.P. and Jain, D.A. (2012). Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of curcuminoids isolated from turmeric. Internat. J. Pharm. & Life Sci., 3 : 1368-1376.

  • Tiwari, B. K. and Agrawal, G. P. (2012). Turmeric: A wonder drug in ayurvedic era. World J. Pharm. & Pharmaceut. Sci., 1 (1): 161-81.

  • Yamgar, V. T., Shirke, M.S. and Kamble, B. M. (2006). Studies on the feasible intercropping in turmeric cv. SALEM. Indian J. Arecanut, Spices & Med. Plants 8 : 44-47.

  • Anonymous (2012). Production and yield of turmeric in world.

  • http//www.indiastat.com.

  • Singh, V. (2012). Prices crash, turmeric growers in the red, Culled from www.tribuneindia.com.


Abstract Views: 308

PDF Views: 1




  • Yield and Economics of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) Influenced by Mulching, Spacing and Intercropping with Green Gram (Vigna radiata)

Abstract Views: 308  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Parkash Singh Sidhu
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bathinda (Punjab), India
Amardeep Singh Brar
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bathinda (Punjab), India
Gurmeet Singh Dhillon
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bathinda (Punjab), India
Navjot Singh Deol
Government Brijindra College, Faridkot (Punjab), India

Abstract


An experiment was conducted during Kharif season of 2011-12 to study from results concluded that maximum fresh rhizome yield of 210.0 q/ha obtained where turmeric sown as sole (T2) and it was at par with T11 where green gram was intercropped. The maximum net return (Rs. 1,46,942) per hectare was obtained in T11 (30 cm inter row spacing) and it was followed by T10 (Rs. 1,16,080) when turmeric and green gram (37.5 cm inter row spacing in turmeric) intercropping with mulching. Mulching produced higher net return Rs. 1, 25,125 in turmeric sole with mulching as compared with Rs. 1,08,720 in turmeric sole without mulching. Highest B:C ratio 3.91 obtained in (T2) turmeric sole with mulching than (T1) turmeric sole without mulching. B:C ratio 3.44 obtained in T11 (where green gram was sown in between turmeric rows) and it was closely followed the 3.91 and 3.58 with and without mulching. Mulching increase the B:C ratio as compared to unmulched treatment. Higher turmeric equivalent yield (253.3 q ha-1) obtained in T11 (where intercropping of green gram in between turmeric rows at 30 cm inter row spacing). Mulch application increases the land equivalent ratio as compared to without mulching. Higher LER (2.0) was obtained in T11 (where 30 cm inter row spacing in turmeric) and it was followed by T9, T7, T8, T10, T5, T6, T3, T4, T2 treatments.

Keywords


Turmeric, Mulching, Economics, B:C Ratio, Returns.

References