International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Economics of tur Production in Amravati district


Affiliations
1 Shri Shivaji Agriculture College, Amravati (M.S.), India
2 Department of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Shri Shivaji Agriculture College, Amravati (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In this study, an attempt has been made to study the "analysis of yield gap in tur in Amravati district" with view to work out the economics tur production and resource use efficiency. The study was based on primary data on input used and there upon costs was collected from two tahsils viz., Amravati and Nandgoan khandeshwar from two tahsils 45 samples were selected. Per hectare input utilization for tur indicated that the medium farmers were used higher inputs as compared to other farm size group of farmers. Per hectare total cost of cultivation of tur for the sample as whole was Rs. 43118.82 per hectore. Gross retuns from tur at overall level was Rs.71349.48. The input-Output ratio at overall size cost 'C' was 1.65. for the study resource use efficiency of tur, Cobb-Douglas production function was used. In the overall group resources human labour, bullock labour, machine labour, fertilizer, plant protection and area were significant. Marginal value of product to factor cost ratio at overall group in case of human labour, machine labour, fertilizer was positive and bullock labour, seeds, manure, plant protection are negative. Marginal physical product to factor cost ratio indicates the change in total physical product to the change in input level of particular independent variable.

Keywords

Cost of Cultivation, Gross Return, Resourse use Efficiency, Tur.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Lingaraju, B.S., Marer, S.B. and Chandrashekhar, S.S. (2008). Intercropping of maize and pigeonpea under rainfed conditions in Northern Karnataka. J. Agric.Sci., 21(1): 1-3.

  • Mistry, H.H., Khatri, R.T. and Patel, K.S. (2011). Resource use efficiency of pigeonpea in Bharuch taluka of south Gujarat.Internat. Res. J. agric. Eco. & Stat., 2 (1): 91-95.

  • More, M.S., Katkade, J.L. and Ghulghule, J.N. (2013). Economics of production of pigeonpea in Parbhani district. IJAAS, 1 : 1-4.

  • Patil, H.A. and Khobarkar, V.K. (2013). Resource use efficiency in wheat production of Amravati division Karnataka. J.Agric. Sci., 31(1): 261.

  • Pawar, N.D. (2004). Economics of production and resource use productivity of Blackgram in Vidarbha region. J.Maharashtra agric. Univ. , 31 (1): 100-103.

  • Pichad, S.P., Wagh, H.J. and Kadam, M.M. (2014). Growth in area, production and productivity of chickpea in Amravati district. Internat. Res. J. Agric. Eco. & Stat., 5 (2): 289-292.

  • Wagh, H.J., Lamtule, J.A. and Kadam, M.M. (2014). Input utilization in tur production- a production function analysis. Internat. Res. J. Agric. Econ. & Stat.,5(2): 253-256.


Abstract Views: 271

PDF Views: 0




  • Economics of tur Production in Amravati district

Abstract Views: 271  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

S. K. Kharat
Shri Shivaji Agriculture College, Amravati (M.S.), India
D. H. Ulemale
Department of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Shri Shivaji Agriculture College, Amravati (M.S.), India
S. N. Ingle
Shri Shivaji Agriculture College, Amravati (M.S.), India

Abstract


In this study, an attempt has been made to study the "analysis of yield gap in tur in Amravati district" with view to work out the economics tur production and resource use efficiency. The study was based on primary data on input used and there upon costs was collected from two tahsils viz., Amravati and Nandgoan khandeshwar from two tahsils 45 samples were selected. Per hectare input utilization for tur indicated that the medium farmers were used higher inputs as compared to other farm size group of farmers. Per hectare total cost of cultivation of tur for the sample as whole was Rs. 43118.82 per hectore. Gross retuns from tur at overall level was Rs.71349.48. The input-Output ratio at overall size cost 'C' was 1.65. for the study resource use efficiency of tur, Cobb-Douglas production function was used. In the overall group resources human labour, bullock labour, machine labour, fertilizer, plant protection and area were significant. Marginal value of product to factor cost ratio at overall group in case of human labour, machine labour, fertilizer was positive and bullock labour, seeds, manure, plant protection are negative. Marginal physical product to factor cost ratio indicates the change in total physical product to the change in input level of particular independent variable.

Keywords


Cost of Cultivation, Gross Return, Resourse use Efficiency, Tur.

References