Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study of Employee Performance Appraisal in Manufacturing Sector


Affiliations
1 Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), India
 

Performance Management system is now widely recognized as a significant vehicle for improving performance and productivity of both employees and organizations. Therefore many organizations are re-examining their current performance management systems and evaluating the significance of the same in overall growth of the employees and organization. The topic under study is ―A study of employee performance appraisal‖. The main objective of the present research was to study the employee performance appraisal in the manufacturing sector and analyze the effectiveness of the present performance system being followed in this sector. Another objective was to collect information about drawbacks of the present performance appraisal system in place in the organization.

Managing human resources in today‘s dynamic environment is becoming more and more complex as well as important. Recognition of people as a valuable resource in the organization has lead to an increased trends in employee maintenance, job security etc. Research deals with the performance appraisal of few companies in manufacturing sector. In this report we have studied and evaluated the performance appraisal process carried out in the companies.

The results obtained from the research show that performance appraisal definitely focus on the overall development and growth of an employee. The employees in the organizations were directly approached and related data was collected through the questionnaire. The data was then analyzed though Pie chart method. From these inference were drawn, based on the inferences, it is found that most of the respondents fell that the performance appraisal system done by the organization is comfortable and satisfactory. 65% respondents were satisfied with already existing performance appraisal system. Some employees want a change in the existing appraisal system. Recommendations are made for training need as well.


Keywords

Performance Appraisal, Manufacturing, Evaluation, Employee Feedback.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abu-Doleh, J. & Weir, D. (2007). Dimensions of performance appraisal systems in Jordanian private and public organizations. ―International Journal of Human Resource Management‖, 18(1), 75-84.
  • Bloomberg L.P., 2 March 2009
  • Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M. Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. ―Journal of Applied Psychology‖, 83, 615-633.
  • Cardy, R. & Dobbins, G. (1994). Performance appraisal: Alternative perspectives. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
  • Cederblom, D. (1982). The performance appraisal interview: A review, implications, and suggestions. ―Academy of Management Review‖, 7(2), 219-227.
  • DeNisi, A. & Pritchard, R. (2006, July). Performance appraisal, performance management, and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2(2), 253-277.
  • Elwood F. Holton II, James W. Trott, Jr. (1996). "Trends Toward a Closer Integration of Vocational Education and Human Resources Development", Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, Vol. 12, No. 2, p7
  • Fletcher, Clive. Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology74 (Nov 2001):p.482.
  • Human Resource Management Text & Cases- K. Ashwathappa Chapter: Performance Appraisal I Management System Page No.: 238-282 TAT A McGraw - Hill Companies Fifth Edition (2008).
  • Kelly D. (2001). Dual Perceptions of HRD: Issues for Policy: SME‘s, Other Constituencies, and the Contested Definitions of Human Resource Development, http://ro.uow.edu.au/artspapers/26.
  • Kelly D. (2006). Human Resource Development: For Enterprise and Human Development, http://ro.uow.edu.au/artspapers/114.
  • L. M. & Levy, P. E. (2000). "Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling, and method bias". Journal of Applied Psychology. 85 (5): 708–723.
  • Managing Human Resources & Personnel Management- R.S.Dwivedi Chapter: Performance Appraisal I Management Page No.: 395 to 425 Galotia Publishing Company
  • Nadler L Ed. (1984). The Handbook of Human Resources Development, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • Pettijohn, L., Parker, R., Pettijohn, C., & Kent, J. (2001). Performance appraisals: usage, criteria, and observations. ―The Journal of Management Development‖, 20, 754-771.
  • Personnel & Human Resource Management- P.Subba Rao Chapter: Performance Appraisal Page No.: 133 to 151 Himalaya Publishing House.
  • Seddon, J. (1987). Assumptions, cultures and performance appraisal. Journal of Management Development, 6, 47-54.
  • Selden,S. & Sowa, J. (2011). Performance management and appraisal in human service organizations: Management and staff perspectives. Public Personnel Management, 40(3), 251-264.
  • Swanson, Richard A., Elwood F. Holton III (2011). "Foundations of Human Resource Development"
  • Stone, R, (2005), Human Resource Management, 5th edition, John Wiley and Sons, QLD Australia.p 412-414 Wood, J, Wallace, J, Zeffane, R, Champan, J, Fromholtz, M, Morrison V( 2004), Organisational Behaviour:A global perspective, 3rd edition, John Wiley and Sons, QLD, Australia.p 355-357.
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville. http://www.uark.edu 22. Xavier University HRD Program. http://www.xavier.edu/hrd

Abstract Views: 212

PDF Views: 146




  • A Study of Employee Performance Appraisal in Manufacturing Sector

Abstract Views: 212  |  PDF Views: 146

Authors

Asha Nagendra
Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), India
Nithya Panicker
Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), India
Shweta Johnson
Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), India
Shruti Adahalli
Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), India

Abstract


Performance Management system is now widely recognized as a significant vehicle for improving performance and productivity of both employees and organizations. Therefore many organizations are re-examining their current performance management systems and evaluating the significance of the same in overall growth of the employees and organization. The topic under study is ―A study of employee performance appraisal‖. The main objective of the present research was to study the employee performance appraisal in the manufacturing sector and analyze the effectiveness of the present performance system being followed in this sector. Another objective was to collect information about drawbacks of the present performance appraisal system in place in the organization.

Managing human resources in today‘s dynamic environment is becoming more and more complex as well as important. Recognition of people as a valuable resource in the organization has lead to an increased trends in employee maintenance, job security etc. Research deals with the performance appraisal of few companies in manufacturing sector. In this report we have studied and evaluated the performance appraisal process carried out in the companies.

The results obtained from the research show that performance appraisal definitely focus on the overall development and growth of an employee. The employees in the organizations were directly approached and related data was collected through the questionnaire. The data was then analyzed though Pie chart method. From these inference were drawn, based on the inferences, it is found that most of the respondents fell that the performance appraisal system done by the organization is comfortable and satisfactory. 65% respondents were satisfied with already existing performance appraisal system. Some employees want a change in the existing appraisal system. Recommendations are made for training need as well.


Keywords


Performance Appraisal, Manufacturing, Evaluation, Employee Feedback.

References