IBMRD's Journal of Management & Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Kota Kinabalu Indonesian School in Management 9 Years of Basic Education in Sabah


Affiliations
1 University of Padjadjaran, Indonesia
 

The mandate contained in the preamble of the 1945 Constitution which is one of the purposes mentioned "intellectual life of the nation". Education services in Indonesia are divided into 3 major sections, namely primary education, secondary education and higher education. The implementation of basic education should be more of a concern to the government because it acts as a foundation. This is stipulated in the 1945 Constitution Article 31 paragraph 1 and 2, which mentions that every citizen has the right of the state to be entitled to education and every citizen must follow basic education and the government must finance it. Until the year 2010 schools are still active and operating there are 14 SILN (Indonesian School of Foreign Affairs), One of them through the establishment of the School of Indonesia Kota Kinabalu (SIKK). Commitment to provide educational services for children of school age in Sabah. In order to carry out its operational activities, funds received and managed by SIKK to provide education services in Sabah and Sarawak are large, channeling funds to each CLC still using cash transactions. SIKK's organizational management is no longer intended for only one school, but it accommodates all the existing school branches (CLC). Based on the background, the question of this research is how SIKK in the management of 9 Years Basic Education in Sabah.

Keywords

Kinabalu, Education, SIKK.
Notifications

  • KamusBesarBahasa Indonesia.Jakarta :BalaiPustaka.

  • African Capacity Building Foundation (ACBF). 2001. Capacity Needs Assesment : AConceptual Framework, in ACBF Newsletter Vol. 2, p. 9-12.

  • Ahmadi, Abu. 2003. IlmuPendidikan. RinekaCipta.Jakarta

  • Ali, Faried. 1997. MetodologiPenelitianSosialDalamBidangIlmuAdministrasi.Jakarta : PT. Raja GrafindoPersada.

  • Basuki, Johanes. 1997. BudayaOrganisasi (KonsepdanTerapan). Jakarta :Yayasan Pembina Manajemen.

  • Cairns. 2005.“Building the Capacity of the Voluntary Nonprofit Sector: Challenges of Theory and Practice.”.Intl Journal of Public Administration, 28 : 869-885. Taylor & Francis Inc.

  • Kerber, K W. &Buono, A. F. (2005).Rethinking Organizational Change : Reframing the Challenge of Change Management. Organizational Development Journal, 23(3): 23-38.

  • Bogdan, Robert C. Dan Steven J. Taylor. 1992. Introduction to Qualitative ResearchMethotds : A Phenomenological Approach in the Social Sciences, alihbahasaAriefFurchan, John Wiley dan Sons, Surabaya, Usaha Nasional.

  • Brown, L. Anne LaFond, & Macintyre, K. 2001. Measuring Capacity Building.Carolina Population Centre.University of Northe Carolina.Chapel Hill.

  • Bryant C, L.G., White. 1986. Management Pembangunan Untuk Negara Berkembang (terjemahan).Jakarta : LP3ES.

  • Bryan, Tara Kolar. 201H1. Exploring the Dimensions of Organizational Capacity for Local Social Service Delivery Organizations Using a Multi-Method Approach. Dissertation of Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University.

  • Burns, T. and Stalker, M. 1996. The Management of Innovation. Tavistock.

  • Cresswell, John. W. 1994. Research Design – Quantitative & Qualitative Approaches.Sage Publications.

  • Cholidarbukodan Abu Achmadi. 2005. MetodologiPenelitian. Jakarta: BumiAksara.

  • Daft, Richard L. 1992. Organizational Behavior. San Fransisco :W.H Freeman and Company.

  • De Vita, Carol J., Cory Flemming, and Eric C. Twombly. 2001. Building Non Profit.

  • Denison, Daniel, F. 1990. Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness.Toronto :John Wiley & Sons.

  • Dwiyanto, Agus. 2005. Mewujudkan Good Governance melaluipelayanan public. Yogyakarta :GadjahMada University Press.

  • Faozanudin, Muslih, 2013. Pengaruh Kapasitas Organisasi Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Efektivitas Pemenuhan Standar Saranadan Prasarana Pendidikan Dasar di Kabupaten Banyumas.Bandung :Desertasipada Program PascasarjanaUniversitasPadjadjaran.

  • Creswell, John W. 2009. Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.Third Edition.California : Sage Publication, Inc.

  • Creswell, W. John. 1994. Research Design : Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. California : Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Connolly, Paul. (2005). Navigating the Organizational Lifecycle: ACapacity Building for Nonprofit Leaders. Washington DC: Boardsource.

  • Dessler, G. 1997. Human Resources Management. Upper Saddle River. New Jersey : Prenticehall.

  • Djogo, Tony,Sunaryo, DidikSuharjito, danMartuaSirait. 2003.Kelembagaandan Kebijakandalam Agroforestry. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). Bogor.

  • Eade, D. 1997. Capacity Building : An Approach to People – Centered Development. Okfam (UK and Ireland).

  • Engkoswara. 1987. Dasar-dasar Administrasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : P2LPTK.

  • Paradigma Manajemen Pendidikan Menyongsong Otonomi Daerah. Bandung :Yayasan Amal Keluarga.

  • Fattah, Nanang. 1999. Landasan Manajemen Pendidikan. Bandung :Remaja Rosda Karya.

  • George M. Jennifer and Jones R. Gareth. 2005. Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior, Fourth Edition. New Jersey : Pearson Prentice Hall of Pearson Education Inc.

  • Goodman, R.M., Speers, M.A., McLeroy, K., et.al., 1998. Identifying and Devining the Dimension of Community Capacity to Provide a Basis for Measurement. Health and Education Behavior.Vol. 25 (3).

  • GIZ. 2011. Kick of Meeting in New Delhi.

  • Grindle, M.S. 1997. Getting Good Government : Capacity Building in the Public Sector of Developing the Dimension of Countries, Boston. MA: Harvard Institute for International Development.

  • GZT, 2005.Support for Desentralization Measure, Guidelines on The Capacity Building in the Regions. Jakarta : P4D.

  • Hari Lubis & Martani Huseini. Teori Organisasi. Jakarta: Pusat Antar Universitas Ilmu Ilmu Sosial Universitas Indonesia.

  • Haryanto. 2014. Pengembangan Kapasitas Kelembagaan (Institutional Capacity Development) Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta : Penerbit AP21-Press.

  • Haryono, danSantosoBambang. 2012. Pembangunan Kapasitas.

  • Hatch, M . J. 1997. Organzation Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Post- Modern Perspective, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press http://bappenas.go.id/get-file-server/node/8559/.

  • IhsanFuad. 2005. Dasar-dasarKependidikan. Jakarta : PTRINEKACIPTA.

  • JICA, 2004.Perspective for Perceiving Capacity.Chapter 2.

  • Kirmanto, Djoko, Pembangunan Perumahan dan Permukiman Yang Berwawasan Lingkungan Strategis Dalam Pencegahan Banjir di Perkotaan, Seminar Peduli Banjir, Forest, Jakarta 25 Maret 2002.

  • Kluckhohn, C. 1953. Universal Categories of Culture. Antropology Today, A.L. Chichago : University Press Koentjaraningrat, 1986. “Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi”, Jakarta: PTRineka Cipta.

  • Lunenburg, F.C. danOmstein, A.C. 2000.Education Administration (Concepts and Practices). London : Thomson Learning Berkshire House.

  • Lusthaus, Charles, et., all. 2002. Organizational Assessment. A Framework for improving performance. Ottawa : Inter-American Development Bank, Washington DC and International Development Research Centre.

  • Mahsun, Mohamad, 2006. Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik,.Penerbit BPFE, Yogyakarta.

  • McKinsey & Company. 2001. Effective Capacity Building in Nonprofit Organizations. New York : Venture Philanthropy Partners.

  • McShane, Steven, Yon Glinow, Mary Ann. 2008. Organizational Behaviour, Fourth Edition. New York : Published by McGraw-Hill/Irwin, a business unit of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

  • Miles, Jefrey A. 2012. Management and Organization Theory, John Willey and Sons, San Francisco.

  • Millen Anneli, 2004. Pegangan Dasar Pengembangan Kapasitas. Yogyakarta : Pondok Pustaka Jogja.

  • Millessen, L. Judith & L. Bies. (2007). “Nonprofit Capacity Building; Who is doing What for Whom and to What End?” Ohio: Journal for Nonprofit Management.

  • Moh.Nazir. 1988. MetodePenelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

  • Moleong, Lexy. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. RemajaRosdakarya.

  • Morgan, Peter. 1997. The Design and Use of Capacity Development Indicators. Hull : Policy Branch CIDA.

  • Morrison, Terrence. 2001. Actionable Learning-A Handbook for Capacity Building Through Case Based Learning. ADB Institute.

  • Murdick, R. G., Ross, J.E., danClaggettt, J.R. 1996. Sistem Informasiuntuk Manajemen Modern. EdisiKetiga. Diterjemahkanoleh :Djamil. Jakarta :Penerbit Erlangga.

  • North, Douglas C. 1991. “Institutions.”Jorunal of Economic Perspectives 5:97-112.

  • Ostrom E. 1985. Formulating the elements of institutional analysis. Paper presented to a Conference on Institutional Analysis and Development Washington DC May 21- 22.

  • Rusli, Budiman. 2013. Kebijakan Publik, membangunpelayananpublik yang responsive. Bandung : Hakim Publishing.

  • R. Dye, Thomas. (1987). Understanding Public Policy. United States of America. Prentice-Hall.

  • Robbins, S. 1990. Organization Theory: Structure, Design, and Applications. Englewood Cliffs NY: Prentice- Hall.

  • RuttanVW, and Hayami Y. 1984. Toward a theory of induced institutional innovation.Journal of Development Studies.Vol 20: 22-203.

  • Sasongko, D.P., Hadiyarto A. 2000. Kebisingan Lingkungan. Univ. Diponegoro, Semarang.

  • Sastra M, Suparno.dkk. 2006. Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Perumahan. Yogyakarta:CV. Andi.

  • Schermerhorn, J.R., Hunt, J.G., & Osborn, R.N. 2000. Managing Organizational Behavior. New York:John Willey & Son.

  • Shafritz, J.M., & E.W. Russel. 1997. Introducing Public Administration. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publisher.

  • Siagian, Sondang P. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta :BumiAksara.

  • Sinambela, LijanPoltak. 2012. KinerjaPegawai : Teori Pengukuran dan Implikasi. Yogyakarta : GrahaIlmu.

  • Solichin, Abdul W.2002.Analisis Kebijaksanaan :Dari Formulasi ke Implementasi Kebijaksanaan Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

  • Sugiyono. 2007. MetodePenelitianAdministrasi.Bandung :Alfabeta.

  • Suprijanto, Iwan. Reformasi Kebijakan & Strategi Penyelenggaraan Perumahan & Permukiman. Dimensi Teknik Arsitektur, Vol. 32, No. 2, Desember 2004 : 161 – 170.

  • Terry, G. R. 1977.Principles of Management (7ed). Georgetown Ontario : Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

  • Tirtarahardja et al. 2005.PengantarPendidikan. Bandung:Rineka Cipta.

  • Tsey, Komla. 2012. Strengthening Organizational Capacity to Improve Indigenous Australian Community Governance: A-TwoWay Approach, Strengthening Organizational Capacity to Improve Indigenous Australian Community Governance : A Two-Way Approach. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 2, No. 2 (2012), pp. 162-175.

  • United Nation Development Programme. 2004. Reducing Disaster Risk : A Challenge for Development. New York : UNDP.

  • Winardi. 2003. TeoriOrganisasi dan Pengorganisasian. Jakarta :RajagrafindoPersada.

  • Young, Oran R. 1999.Institutional Dimension of Global Environmental Change, Public Administration and Public Policy, Vol. II, Rep. No. 9, Pp. 100. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Bonn.


Abstract Views: 209

PDF Views: 90




  • Kota Kinabalu Indonesian School in Management 9 Years of Basic Education in Sabah

Abstract Views: 209  |  PDF Views: 90

Authors

Budiman Rusli
University of Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Tora Akadira
University of Padjadjaran, Indonesia

Abstract


The mandate contained in the preamble of the 1945 Constitution which is one of the purposes mentioned "intellectual life of the nation". Education services in Indonesia are divided into 3 major sections, namely primary education, secondary education and higher education. The implementation of basic education should be more of a concern to the government because it acts as a foundation. This is stipulated in the 1945 Constitution Article 31 paragraph 1 and 2, which mentions that every citizen has the right of the state to be entitled to education and every citizen must follow basic education and the government must finance it. Until the year 2010 schools are still active and operating there are 14 SILN (Indonesian School of Foreign Affairs), One of them through the establishment of the School of Indonesia Kota Kinabalu (SIKK). Commitment to provide educational services for children of school age in Sabah. In order to carry out its operational activities, funds received and managed by SIKK to provide education services in Sabah and Sarawak are large, channeling funds to each CLC still using cash transactions. SIKK's organizational management is no longer intended for only one school, but it accommodates all the existing school branches (CLC). Based on the background, the question of this research is how SIKK in the management of 9 Years Basic Education in Sabah.

Keywords


Kinabalu, Education, SIKK.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17697/ibmrd%2F2018%2Fv7i1%2F122956