Open Access
Subscription Access
Influence of Rotary Assisted Electrical Discharge Machining of 17-4PH Stainless Steel Using Taguchi Technique
The current investigation has study the material removal rate, surface roughness and electrode wear rate in rotary tool assisted EDM of 17-4 PH stainless steel. 17-4 PH SS has widely used in aerospace, marine, nuclear, and chemical processing due to their characteristic high strength to weight ratio and corrosion resistance properties. This paper primarily focuses on enhancing the flushing efficiency of dielectric fluid in the EDM process and to improve the machining performance characteristics. A custom designed rotating electrode attachment has fabricated and used to assist with the EDM process. The experiments are designed and planned using Taguchi L<sub>27</sub> Orthogonal array technique. The experiments are planned for four input factors and each parameter is varied at three levels. Current, pulse on time, pulse off time and Electrode Rotation Speed are input factors. ANOVA test is conducted to find out the significance of factors and their percentage contribution on the performance characteristics like Material Removal Rate, Surface Roughness and Electrode Wear Rate. The results concluded that Electrode Rotation Speed has more influence on Material Removal Rate and Electrode Wear Rate. An individual percentage and interaction percentage of parameters from ANOVA confirm that their effects are higher in Material Removal Rate (MRR) compared to Surface roughness (Ra) and Electrode Wear Rate (EWR). Finally, surface morphology studies revealed that significantly less cracks and voids had formed on the EDM’ed sample at optimum condition.
Keywords
Rotary EDM, Taguchi Method, Surface Morphology, PH 17-4 Stainless Steel, ANOVA Analysis.
User
Font Size
Information
- Chien W T, & Tsai C S, J Mater Process Technol, 140 (2003) 340.
- Raj SV, Ghosn LJ, Lerch BA, Hebsur M, Cosgriff LM, & Fedor J, Mater Sci Eng A, 456 (2007) 305.
- Arisoy CF, Başman G, & Şeşen MK, Eng Fail Anal, 10 (2003) 711.
- Bhaduri AK, Gill TP, Srinivasan G, & Sujith S, Sci technol weld joining, 4 (1999) 295.
- Lin X, Cao Y, Wu X, Yang H, Chen J, & Huang W, Mater Sci Eng A 553 (2012) 80.
- Wu JH, & Lin CK, Metall Mater Trans, 33 (2002) 1715.
- Akita M, Uematsu Y, Kakiuchi T, Nakajima M, & Kawaguchi R, Mater Sci Eng: A, 666 (2016) 19.
- Chandramouli S, & Eswaraiah K, Mater Today: Proc, 5 (2018) 5058.
- Reddy VV, Valli PM, Kumar A, & Reddy CS, J Adv Manuf Syst, 14 (2015) 189.
- Reddy VV, Kumar A, Valli PM, & Reddy CS, J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 37 (2015) 641.
- Kolli M, & Kumar A, Eng Sci Technol Int J, 18 (2015) 524.
- Kolli M, & Kumar A, Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf, 231 (2017) 641.
- Kolli M, & Kumar A, Silicon, 11 (2019) 1731.
- Etemadi AR, Fazel B, & Emami A, J fail anal prev, 11 (2011) 493.
- Fukuzawa Y, Kojima Y, Tani T, Sekiguti E, & Mohri N, Mater Manuf Process, 10 (1995) 195.
- Jha AK, Sreekumar K, & Sinha PP, Eng Fail Anal, 17 (2010) 1195.
- Chandramouli S, & Eswaraiah K, Mater Today: Proc, 4 (2017) 2040.
- Gopalakannan S, & Senthilvelan T, J Miner Mater Charact Eng, 11 (2012) 685.
- Aliakbari E, & Baseri H, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 62 (2012) 1041.
- Sharma P, Singh S, & Mishra DR, Procedia Mater Sci, 5 (2014) 1771.
- Muthuramalingam T, & Mohan B, Mater Manuf Processes, 28 (2013) 375.
- Singh A, & Singh R, Int J Innov Res Sci Technol, 2 (2015) 164.
- Teimouri R, & Baseri H, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 67 (2013) 1371.
- Soni JS, & Chakraverti G, Wear, 171 (1994) 5.
Abstract Views: 139
PDF Views: 97