International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Systems

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Impact of Bar Service Operation Practices on Organizational Performance in Indian Hotel Industry


Affiliations
1 Department of Tourism and Hotel Management, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India
2 UIHTM, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The paper has a two fold purpose-examine the impact of bar service operation practices (BSOP) on organizational performance (OP) and study the relationship between organizational performance and demographic variables. Based on a survey of 362 bar manager's perceptions on the impact of bar service operation practices on organisational performance were assessed by 59 practices and 6 demographic variables. Bivariate test and ANOVA were employed to test the working hypothesis in the study. Results indicated that 'there is a positive relationship between the bar service operation practices and organisational performance. Further, the results indicate some practical and managerial implications to improve organisational overall performance.

Keywords

Bar, Service, Practices, Hotel, Industry, Performance, India.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ansel, D., & Dyer, C. (1999).A framework for restaurant information technology. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 40(3), 74–84.

  • Barry, T. (1993). Empowerment : The US experience. Empowerment in Organisations, 1(1), 24-28.

  • Bendall, D. (1995). Table management tools.Restaurant Hospitality, 79(6), 102.

  • Bertsimas, D., & Shioda, R. (2003). Restaurant revenue management. Operations Research, 51(3), 472-486.

  • Borchgrevink, C., & Anchill, D. (2003). Beverage control systems and the guests perspective: Standarization and value. Journal of Hospitality and Leisure Marketing, 10(1/2), 151.

  • Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990). The service encounters: Diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 71-84.

  • Cetron, M. J. (2008). 10 trends now shaping the future of hospitality. HSMAI Marketing Review, 25(1), 20–31.

  • Coltman, M. (1989). Cost Control for the Hospitality Industry. (2nd ed.). New York: Van, Nostrand Reinhold.

  • Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: Are examination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56, 55-68.

  • Durocher, J. (2005). Multiplication tables. Restaurant Business, 104(11), 66–68.

  • Dumas, K. (2006, Aug 9-Aug 15). Diners should pay by portion, not age. Michigan Chronicle, pp. A6.

  • Godmark, E. (2003). Controlling liquor, Wine and Beverage costs, Florida: Atlantic Publishing Group, Inc.

  • Gonzalez-Gomez, J. I., & Morini, S. (2006). An activitybased costing of wine. Journal of Wine Research 17(3), 195-203. doi:10.1080/09571260701286650

  • Gronroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. Journal of Marketing, 18, 36-44.

  • Hinkin, T., & Tracey, J. B. (2000). The cost of turnover. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Quarterly, 41(3), 14–21.

  • Kimes, S. E., & Thompson G. M. (2004). Restaurant revenue management at Chevys: Determining the best table mix. Decision Sciences, 35(3), 371–392

  • Kimes, S. E. (2008). The role of technology in restaurant revenue management. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 49(3), 297–309.

  • Kim, W. G., Ng, C. Y. N., & Kim, Y. (2009). Influence of institutional DINESERV on customer satisfaction, return intention, and word-of-mouth. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28, 10-17.

  • Kotschever, L., & Tanke, M. (1996). Managing Bar and Beverage Operations, Educational Institute of the American Hotel & Motel Association, USA.

  • Kooser, A. C. (2009). The latest in POS: The next generation is here. Restaurant Business, 108(5), 28–29.

  • Lee, H., Lee Y., & Yoo D. (2000). The determinants of perceived service quality and its relationship with satisfaction. Journal of Services Marketing, 14(3), 217-231.

  • Lockyer, S. (2007). Food trends.Nation’s Restaurant News, 41(49), S34.

  • Lynn, M., &Withiam;, G. (2008). Tipping and its alternatives: Business considerationsand directions for research. Journal of Services Marketing, 22(4), 328–336.

  • Malone, M. (2003). Hands in the till. Restaurant Business, 102(7).

  • Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India, (2012). Economic survey on services sectors, India.

  • Mills, S., & Riehle, H. (1987). Tips vs service charges. Restaurants USA, (October), 20–22.

  • Nelson, P. (2007), Preventing employee theft, Grill, 5(7), 24.

  • O’Brien, L. (2004). Established procedures help by-theglass sales flow. Nation’s Restaurant News, 38(12), 80.

  • Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioural perspective on the consumer. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

  • Oronsky, C. R., & Chathoth, P. K. (2007). An exploratory study examininginformation technology adoption and implementation in full-servicerestaurant firms. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 26(4), 941–956.

  • Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings. Journal of Retailing, 57(3), 25-48.

  • Ojasalo, J. (2001). Managing Customer Expectations in Professional Services. Managing Service Quality, 11(3), MCB University Press

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.

  • Plotkin, R., & Goumas, S. (2000). Successful Beverage Management: Proven Strategies for the On-premise Operator, Bar Media: Tucson.

  • Prewitt, M. (2008). Rising costs threaten operators’ margins. Nation’s Restaurant News, 42(15), 1.

  • Raab, C., & Mayer, K. (2007). Menu engineering and activity-based costing - can theywork together in a restaurant? International Journal of Contemporary HospitalityManagement, 19(1), 43.

  • Singaravelavan R. (2011). Food & Beverage Service. Oxford University Press, New Delhi.

  • Smith, J. (1997). How to protect your bar against employee theft. Nation’s Restaurant News, 31(24), pp. 36.

  • Scarpa, J. (2006). Beverage controls elevate bar profits by cutting waste, theft. Nation’s Restaurant News, 40(43), 4-32.

  • Taylor, R., Davies, D., & Savery, L. (2001). The role of appraisal and training inreducing staff turnover in the Western Australian accommodation industry. Management Research News, 24(10/11), 56-57.

  • Thompson, G. M. (2002). Optimizing a restaurant’s seating capacity: Use dedicated or combinable tables? Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 48–57.

  • Thompson, G. M. (2003). Optimizing restaurant-table configurations: Specifying combinable tables. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 53–60.

  • Ting, D. H. (2004). Service quality and satisfaction perceptions: Curvilinear and interaction effect. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22(6), 407-420.

  • Wessels, W. J. (1997). Minimum wages and tipped servers. Economic Inquiry, 35(2), 334–349.

  • Wildes, V. (2005). Stigma in food service work: How it affects restaurant serversintention to stay in the business or recommend a job to another. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 5(3), 213–233.

  • Wildes, V., Nann, S., & DeMicco, F. (1998). The Penn State/ USA Today restaurant service survey or (un)forkedible frequencies. Journal of International Hospitality, Leisure and Tourism Management, 1(3), 103–115.


Abstract Views: 434

PDF Views: 0




  • The Impact of Bar Service Operation Practices on Organizational Performance in Indian Hotel Industry

Abstract Views: 434  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Mohinder C. Dhiman
Department of Tourism and Hotel Management, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India
Abhishek Ghai
UIHTM, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

Abstract


The paper has a two fold purpose-examine the impact of bar service operation practices (BSOP) on organizational performance (OP) and study the relationship between organizational performance and demographic variables. Based on a survey of 362 bar manager's perceptions on the impact of bar service operation practices on organisational performance were assessed by 59 practices and 6 demographic variables. Bivariate test and ANOVA were employed to test the working hypothesis in the study. Results indicated that 'there is a positive relationship between the bar service operation practices and organisational performance. Further, the results indicate some practical and managerial implications to improve organisational overall performance.

Keywords


Bar, Service, Practices, Hotel, Industry, Performance, India.

References