Indian Journal of Innovations and Developments

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The overall Relationships between the Use of English Language Learning Strategies and Personality Traits among the Female University Level Learners of English Language as a University Major


Affiliations
1 Department Linguistics, University of Mysore, Mysore-570006, Karnataka, India
 

The current study aims to explore the overall relationships between use of English language learning strategies and personality traits of the female university level learners of English language as a university major. Four instruments were used, which were Adapted Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) of Rebecca L. Oxfords, A Background Questionnaire, NEO-Five Factors Inventory (NEO-FFI), and Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL). Two hundred and thirteen Iranian female university level learners of English language as a university major in Iran were volunteer to participate in this research work. The intact classes were chosen. The obtained results in this study show both types of positive and negative significant relationships at different levels of correlation. In addition, in some cases, there was not any significant relationship between reported frequency of English Language Learning Strategies and personality traits

Keywords

English Language Learning Strategies, Personality Traits, Learners of English Languag, English Language As A University Major, Female University Level Learners
User
Notifications

  • Abu Shmais W (2004) The English language learning strategies of Al-Najah national university EFL majors. J Islamic Univ of Gaza, 12(1), 51-75.

  • Brown HD (1973) Affecting variables in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 23(2), 231-244.

  • Chamot AU, Barnhardt S, El-Dinnary PB, and Rubbins J (1999) The learning strategies handbook. New York: Longman.

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Costa PT and McCare RR (1992) Professional manual for the NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

  • Delavar A (2010) Theoretical and experimental principle of research in human sciences. Tehran: Roshd Publication.

  • Digman JM and Inouye J (1986) Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. J Personality and Soc Psychol, 50,116-123.

  • Ellis R (1985) Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ely CM (1986) An analysis of discomfort, risk taking, sociability, and motivation in the L2 classroom. Lang Learn, 36(1), 1-25.

  • Fakeye DO and Ogunsiji Y (2009) English language proficiency as a predictor of academic achievement among EFL students in Nigeria. Euro J Sci Res, 3490-495.

  • Ghiasvand A (2008) Application of statistics and SPSS in data analysis. Tehran: Lovieh publication.

  • Goldberg LR (1981) Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Rev personality soc psychol, 2, 141-165. Beverrly Hills, CA: Sage.

  • Goldberg LR (1990) An alternative description of personality: The big five factor structure. J Personality and Soc Psychol, 59, 1216-1229.

  • John OP (1990) The big five factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the nature language and in the questionnaire. In L.A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (pp.66-100). New York: Guilford Press.

  • McCare RR and Costa PT Jr (1985) Updating Norman’s adequate taxonomy: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. J Personality Psychol, 49,710-721. 16. O'Malley JM, Chamot AU, Stewner-Manzanares G, Russo RP and Kupper L (1985) Language strategy application with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19(13), 557-584.

  • Oxford RL (1990) Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

  • Oxford RL (1996) Employing a questionnaire to assess the use of language learning strategies. App Lang Learn, 7(1& 2), 25-45.

  • Reiss MA (1983) Helping the unsuccessful language learner. Can Mod Lang Rev, 39(2), 257-266. 20. Saucier G and Goldberg LR (1996) Evidence for the big five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives. Euro J Pers, 7, 1-17.

  • Smart JC. (1970) Underachievers and overachievers in intermediate French. Mod Lang J, 54(6), 415-420.

  • Strong M (1983) Social styles and the second language acquisition of Spanish speaking kindergartners. TEOSLQuarterly, 17(2), 241-258.

  • TOEFL Samples (2009) Tehran: Rahnama Publications.

  • Wenden A (1985) Learner strategies. TESOL Newsletter, 19(5), 1-7.


Abstract Views: 370

PDF Views: 60




  • The overall Relationships between the Use of English Language Learning Strategies and Personality Traits among the Female University Level Learners of English Language as a University Major

Abstract Views: 370  |  PDF Views: 60

Authors

Seyed Hossein Fazeli
Department Linguistics, University of Mysore, Mysore-570006, Karnataka, India

Abstract


The current study aims to explore the overall relationships between use of English language learning strategies and personality traits of the female university level learners of English language as a university major. Four instruments were used, which were Adapted Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) of Rebecca L. Oxfords, A Background Questionnaire, NEO-Five Factors Inventory (NEO-FFI), and Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL). Two hundred and thirteen Iranian female university level learners of English language as a university major in Iran were volunteer to participate in this research work. The intact classes were chosen. The obtained results in this study show both types of positive and negative significant relationships at different levels of correlation. In addition, in some cases, there was not any significant relationship between reported frequency of English Language Learning Strategies and personality traits

Keywords


English Language Learning Strategies, Personality Traits, Learners of English Languag, English Language As A University Major, Female University Level Learners

References