Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kumar, Alok
- Towards Realist Constructivism: Implications for Teaching & Training
Abstract Views :179 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Chandragupt Institute of Management, Patna-800001, IN
1 Chandragupt Institute of Management, Patna-800001, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev., Vol 46, No 3 (2011), Pagination: 523-535Abstract
Constructivism is a popular but often misconstrued worldview. This article strengthens the constructivist position by showing that it can withstand a knowable real world. Such a position helps to correct many widespread practices in the name of constructivist education such as equating hands-on experiences with active learning. Further, it spans constructivism over the entire training life cycle. It makes a strong case for constructivism as a way to have a world that knows to live with diversity.
References
- Bagley, C. & Hunter, B. (1992), “Restructuring, Constructivism, and Technology: Forging a New Relationship”. Educational Technology, 32(7): 22-27.
- Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
- Brooks, J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1993), In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms, Alexandria, CA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Bruner, J. (1966), Toward a Theory of Instruction, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Campoy, R. (1992), “The Role of Technology in the School Reform Movement”, Educational Technology, 32(8): 17-22.
- Clark, M. (2002), In Search of Human Nature, London: Routledge.
- Collins, A. (1991), “The Role of Computer Technology in Restructuring Schools”. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(1): 28-36.
- Diettrich, O. (2001), “A Physical Approach to the Construction of Cognition and to Cognitive Evolution”. Foundation of Science, 6: 273–341.
- Einstein, A. (2000), “Relativity: The Special and General Theory”. Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://www.bartleby.com/173/.
- Foerster, H. v. (1973), “On Constructing a Reality”. in F. E. Preiser (Ed.), Environmental Design Research, 2: 35-46. Stroudberg: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
- Glasersfeld, E. V. (1995), Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning, London: The Falmer Press.
- Hofstede, G (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions, and Organisations across Nations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
- House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., Gupta, V. & Associates (Eds.) (2004), Culture, Leadership, and Organisations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Kelly, G. (1963), A Theory of Personality, New York: Norton.
- Kuhn, T. S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2 ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- LeBaron, J. F., & Bragg, C. A. (1994), “Practicing What We Preach: Creating Distance Education Models to Prepare Teachers for the Twenty-first Century”, American Journal of Distance Education, 8: 5-19.
- Llinás, R. R. (2001), I of the Vortex, Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Mann, C. (1994), “New Technologies and Gifted Education”, Roeper Review, 16(3): 172-76.
- Maturana, H. R, & Varela, F. J. (1979), Autopoiesis and Cognition, Boston: Reidel.
- Mookerji, R. K. (1969), Ancient Indian Education, Delhi: Motilal Banarasi Das.
- Piaget, J. (1954),The Construction of Reality in the Child, New York: Ballantine.
- Plonsky, M. (1998), “Canine Vision” [Electronic Version]. Retrieved July 01, 2010 from http://www.uwsp.edu/psych/dog/LA/ DrP4.htm.
- Popper, K. (1963), “Conjectures and Refutations”. London: Routledge.
- Strommen, E. F. & Lincoln, B. (1992), “Constructivism, Technology, and the Future of Classroom Learning”. Education and Urban Society, 24(4): 466-76.
- The Participation-Direction Debate in Leadership:Insights from Ramayana
Abstract Views :153 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Chandragupt Institute of Management, Patna, IN
1 Chandragupt Institute of Management, Patna, IN