International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Knowledge Management Process:An Empirical Examination in Indian Higher Educational Institutions


Affiliations
1 Department of Management, Aggarwal College, Ballabgarh, Haryana, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Purpose – The purpose of the study is to identify the practices of knowledge management process in Indian higher educational institutions.

Design/methodology/approach – The study involved 225 research scholars and 225 faculties’ members from nine higher educational institutions. The respondents were required to respond to a five-point Likert scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The collected data were then analyzed using the SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 18.0 software packages. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted followed by confirmatory factor analysis. Descriptive and statistical data analyses were also performed on various dimensions of knowledge management process practices. Findings – The research paper extracted that more than 0.5% of the respondents were strongly agreed and agreed towards each and every items of the knowledge management process dimensions. On the basis of the mean ranks for knowledge management process dimensions, respondents gave first preference to ‘knowledge storing and sharing’, followed by ‘knowledge acquisition and creation’. ‘Knowledge application’ was found to be the least-preferred dimension on the basis of mean rank.


Keywords

Mean Rank, Knowledge Management Process, Knowledge Management Assessment Instrument, Indian Higher Educational Institutions.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.

  • Al-Zayyat, A. N., Al-Khaldi, F., Tadros, I. & Al-Edwan, G. (2009). The effect of knowledge management processes on project management: An empirical study on information technology industry in Jordan. IBIMA Business Review, 3, 47-52.

  • Beckman, T. J. (1997). A Methodology for Knowledge Management. Proceedings of International Association of Science and Technology for Development (IASTED) AI and Soft Computing Conference, Banff, Canada.

  • Chin-Loy, C., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2007). The influence of organizational culture on the success of knowledge management practices with North American companies. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 6(3), 15-28.

  • Darroch, J., & McNaughton, R. (2002). Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3), 210-222.

  • Daud, S., & Yusuf, W. F. W. (2008). An empirical study of knowledge management processes in small and medium enterprises. Communications of the IBIMA, 4, 169-177.

  • Demarest, M. (1997). Understanding knowledge management. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 374-384.

  • Ernst & Young (1998). In: Lee, H. & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes and Organizational Performance: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Ph.D. Thesis, Korea.

  • Fong, P. S. W., &. Choi, S. K. Y. (2009). The processes of knowledge management in professional services firms in the construction industry: A critical assessment of both theory and practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(2), 110-126.

  • Lawson, S. (2003). Examining the Relationship between Organization Culture and Knowledge Management. Ph.D. Thesis, Nova Southeastern University, US.

  • Lee, K. C., Lee, S. & Kang, I. W. (2005). KMPI: Measuring knowledge management performance. Information & Management, 42(3), 469-482.

  • Lin, H. F. & Lee, G. G. (2004). Perceptions of senior managers toward knowledge sharing behaviour. Management Decision, 42(1), 108-125.

  • Liu, P. L., & Tsai, C. H. (2009). A study on the relationship between knowledge management, knowledge absorption and innovative management capabilities in Taiwan’s hightech industries. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 17(1), 1-17.

  • McAdam, R., & Reid, R. (2000). A comparison of public and private sector perceptions and use of knowledge management. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(6), 317-329.

  • Mohayidin, M. G., Azirawani, N., Kamaruddin, M. N., & Margono, M. I. (2007). The application of knowledge management in enhancing the performance of Malaysian universities. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(3), 301-312.

  • Pattanayak, B. (2009). Human Resource Management (3rd ed). New Delhi: PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.

  • Rahimi, H., Arbabisarjou, A., Allameh, S. M., & Aghababaei, R. (2011). Relationship between knowledge management process and creativity among faculty members in the university. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management, 6, 17-33.

  • Ramachandran, S. D., Chong, S. C., & Ismail, H. (2009). The practice of knowledge management processes: A comparative study of public and private higher education institutions in Malaysia. The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 39(3), 203-222.

  • Yap, L. S., Tasmin, R., Rusuli, M. S. C., & Hashim, N. (2010). Factors influencing knowledge management practices among multimedia super corridor (MSC) organizations.Communications of the IBIMA. Retrieved from http://www.ibimapublishing.com/journals/CIBIMA/cibi-ma.html on 27 January, 2011.


Abstract Views: 365

PDF Views: 1




  • Knowledge Management Process:An Empirical Examination in Indian Higher Educational Institutions

Abstract Views: 365  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Ashima Chawla
Department of Management, Aggarwal College, Ballabgarh, Haryana, India

Abstract


Purpose – The purpose of the study is to identify the practices of knowledge management process in Indian higher educational institutions.

Design/methodology/approach – The study involved 225 research scholars and 225 faculties’ members from nine higher educational institutions. The respondents were required to respond to a five-point Likert scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The collected data were then analyzed using the SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 18.0 software packages. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted followed by confirmatory factor analysis. Descriptive and statistical data analyses were also performed on various dimensions of knowledge management process practices. Findings – The research paper extracted that more than 0.5% of the respondents were strongly agreed and agreed towards each and every items of the knowledge management process dimensions. On the basis of the mean ranks for knowledge management process dimensions, respondents gave first preference to ‘knowledge storing and sharing’, followed by ‘knowledge acquisition and creation’. ‘Knowledge application’ was found to be the least-preferred dimension on the basis of mean rank.


Keywords


Mean Rank, Knowledge Management Process, Knowledge Management Assessment Instrument, Indian Higher Educational Institutions.

References