Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Review into Talent Management, Talent Retention and its Scope for Learning Organisations


Affiliations
1 B. K. Majumdar Institute of Business Administration, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
2 H.L. Campus, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


"The demographic changes that we see occurring in many of the regions where we operate - shrinking populations, an ageing workforce and diversifying demographics - compound the challenges we face and intensify the war for talent."

Peter M. Senge, a senior lecturer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, first coined the term 'The Learning Organisation' in his famous book 'The Fifth Discipline: the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization' in the1990's. He said that a learning organisation is an organisation that has developed the continuous capacity to adapt and change. This means that the organisation views change not as a threat to resist, but as an opportunity to become more effective, flexible and responsive. For this to happen, he argues that organisations need to 'discover how to tap people's commitment and capacity to learn at all levels'. An organisation needs to attract, retain and nurture people who foster a sense of purpose, develop unique strategies, attract other committed people, have an ability to innovate and view work environment as a continual learning structure. Talent management is becoming increasingly crucial for such an organisation that endeavors to compete in this increasingly complex dynamic business environment that fosters disruptive technologies and shifts in customer preferences.

They say that a company is only as good as the quality of its talent. Indian companies today are grappling with double digit attrition rates which at 14% is more than the global average and that costs the organisation three to four times an individual's salary. Top turnover drivers in India include poor job definition, leadership quality, inefficient people management, non-competitive compensation, inadequate career advancement and work-life imbalance. Every organisation has high performers, employees who are head and shoulders above their co-workers in terms of the value they bring to the organisation. Sourcing and retaining such a workforce, contributing significantly to their career growth and aligning workers' productivity to support corporate objectives are some of the major challenges faced by organisations today. Today businesses are in a state of constant flux, they need to be agile enough to react quickly to a dynamic environment, while maintaining a long-term strategic focus. Despite continuing to be of significant interest and popularity of both academicians and practitioners alike, the content and practices of talent management have remained obscure. Talent management has always probed into effective attraction to retention of knowledgeable talent. Talent retention has now come to the fore as organisations realize that more and more to be levied on the existent talent workforce rather than attracting newer ones. According to a recent research by Monster.com, nearly 61% of the CEOs have employee satisfaction as an integral part of their goals whereas 80% of CEOs say that HR issues are core to a company's success. About 73% of CEOs spend a fourth of their time in talent development, with a similar percentage spending it on retention of the best performers. Talent management has become a headache for CEOs with only 30% saying that they have the talent they need to fulfil their future growth ambitions.

 Sylvia Vorhauser-Smith a leading columnist with the Forbes magazine states that money attracts but it does not retain, case in point being the low commitment, high turnover and the job-hopping frenzy of the modern Indian workforce. A recent Mercer survey backs this up with results showing that 54% of Indians are seriously considering leaving their present employer, the figure was just 26% in 2004, and this trend increases to 66% in the 16-24 year age bracket. Many of the generation next employees are unconvinced that excessive work demands are worth the sacrifices to their personal life. Perhaps then it is not surprising that career progression and training opportunities rank with pay as the top three factors motivating Indian employees to stay. And that means investments in talent management become a critical and strategic success factor in ensuring that Indian businesses can deliver. Salary increments are low-hanging fruit. Every employer can do that and there is no differentiation. Towers Watson India's director for talent and reward practices, Subeer Bakshi says that Employee Value Proposition (EVP) can be an effective tool in creating right balance between employee preferences and employer needs. Employers need to gauge if their EVP which includes but is not limited to performance recognition, learning&development, career, succession management, supporting work environments, setting clear expectations, being a coach and building on employees' strengths, fully utilising and recognising talent etc. are compelling and alluring enough.

 Talent management in India is a risk management strategy against the effect that it has on businesses having scarce or insufficient human resource capital to fulfil organisational requirements. Businesses today need to understand the cost of employee turnover because it causes the tangible and intangible costs to rise extensively. This includes the cost of not just of hiring the talent, but also the opportunity cost related to market losses, lead-time for actual delivery from new hires and productivity losses of individuals from affected teams. A look at the impact of talent constraints in India suggests that businesses have lost out in terms of cancelling or delaying key strategic initiatives. According to the 15th PwC Annual Global CEO Survey 41% of CEOs in India had to either cancel or delay a key strategic initiative and 39% of CEO's stated that their talent related expenses have raised more than expected. In such a scenario, both domestic Indian companies and multinational corporations operating in India have much ground to cover.

Developing, managing and retaining individuals as part of a planned talent management strategy are of utmost signifi cance. A recent newspaper article quoted Fortis Global Healthcare Holdings CEO Vishal Bali, saying that increasingly, in a competitive job market, head honchos are called upon to play the role of a chief talent offi cer where their challenge is to retain the best and build the rest. This is progressively becoming the guiding principle across Indian companies, whether entrepreneurial, professional or family-run. With Indian companies now in the throes of a high growth trajectory, talent management and talent retention are becoming key responsibilities. Efforts and talent practices should be routed towards creating higher retention to be able to be better equipped with talented workforce. Past research shows that talent management practices have the greatest return on investment when aligned with key success indicators of an organisation.

 This paper therefore deals with important needs and essence of Talent Retention in today's organisations which face intensive competition. It highlights the various facets of Talent Retention, its practices as well as depicts the various areas like commitment, satisfaction, hierarchical level of the employees etc., that retention needs to cater to and studying the relationship between the strategies that organisations implement and expectations of employees. These fi ndings would help learning organisations explore and analyse the best practices that need to be undertaken to understand talent management, whether the strategies that they have adopted are giving them an edge in adapting and accepting change and to promote learning as a positive necessary aspect of the company culture. It is inevitable to understand the nuances of an organisation without understanding its employees. Talent is important and organisations insist on the right kind of talent to be able to sustain competition and survive. Without having the right set of talent practices organisations may fall prey to competition which would invariably affect the survival of organisations.


Keywords

Learning Organisation, Talent Management, Talent Retention, Talent Strategies, Employee Value Proposition (EVP).
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Brown, A., & Duncan, A. (2003). Strategic Talent Retention. Strategic HR Review, 2(4).
  • Annelize Botha, M. B. (2011). An employer brand predictive model for talent attraction and retention. South African Journal of Human Resource Management, 298-309.
  • Ashwathappa, K. (2010). Human resources management (Sixth ed.). New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill.
  • Ananthan, B. R., & Rao, S. (2011). Dynamis of retention: Practices & strategies. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 120-125.
  • Berger, L. A. (2011). Talent Management Handbook. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
  • Brown, J. B. (2010). The talent vacuum-Keeping your best talent in a downturn. AACE International Transactions, 4.1-4.11.
  • Bruyn, P. G. (2011). Flexible Work Practices (FWP) - An effective instrument in the retention of talent: A survey of selected JSE-listed companies. South African Journal of Business Management, 42(4), 63-78.
  • Carre, P. A. (1992). L' Automation dans L' Entreprise. Management Development Review.
  • Chambers, E., Foulon, M., Handfi eld-Jones, H., Hankin, S. M., & Michael III, E. G. (1998). The war of talent. The McKinsey Quarterly, 45-57.
  • Coffman, C. (2000). Is your company bleeding talent? How to become a true "employer of choice". The Gallup Management Journal.
  • Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19(4), 304-313.
  • Crim, G. H. (2006). What engages employees the most or, The Ten C's of employee engagement. Ivey Business Journal, 1-5.
  • Dernovsek, D. (2008). Creating highly engaged and committed employee starts at the top and ends at the bottomline. Credit Union National Association, Inc.
  • Döckel, A. B. (2006). The effect of retention factors on organisational commitment: An investigation of high technology employees. South African Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(2), 20-28.
  • Andy Brown, A. D. (2003). Strategic talent retention. Strategic HR Review, 2(4).
  • Carre, P., & Pearn, M. (1992). L'autoformation dans l'entreprise. Paris. Entente
  • Duttagupta, R. (2005). Identifying and managing your assets: Talent Management. Intellectual Asset Management Magazine, 1-6.
  • Finegold, D., & Mohrman, S. (2001). What Do Employees Really Want? The Perception vs. The Reality. Strategies far the Knowledge Economy: From Rhetoric to Reality report, 1-44.
  • Florinda Matos, A. L. (2012). Talent Attraction and Reputation. European conference on intellectual capital, 286-293.
  • Griffeth, S. R. (2009). The development of multidimensional measure of job market cognitions: The employement opportunity index (EOI). Journal of Applied Psychology, 335-349.
  • Griffeth, S. R. (n.d.). The development of multidimensional measure of job market cognitions: The Employement Opportunity Index(EOI). Journal of Applied Psychology, 335-349.
  • Grobler, P. (2011). Flexible Work Practices (FWP) - An effective instrument in the retention of talent: A survey of selected JSE-listed companies. South African Journal of Business Management.
  • Guthridge, M., Komm, A., & Emily, L. (2008). Making talent a strategic priority. The McKinsey Quarterly, 50-59.
  • Harris, P. (2007). Flexible work policies mean business. Training and Development,, 32-36.
  • Hom, P. W. (1995). Employee Turnover. Heinen, J. S., & O'Neil, C. (2004). Managing Talent to Maximise Performance. Employment Relations Today, 67-82.
  • Jan Selmer, J. L. (2011). Expatriate academics: Job factors and work outcomes. International Journal of Manpower, 194-210.
  • Hausknecht, J., Rodda, J. M., & Howard, M. J. (2009). Targeted Employee Retention, Performance Based and Job-Related Differences in Reported Reasons for Staying. Human Resource Management, 48(2), 269-288.
  • LRG. (2011). A study on the leyel of commitment towards retention practices in IT and Non - IT Companies in Chennai. Advances in Management, 4(2), 53-56.
  • Macquire, H. (2001). Psychological contracts: Are they still relevant? Career Development International, 167-179.
  • Meisinger, S. (2007). Flexible schedules make powerful perks. HR Magazine, 52(4).
  • Mishra, N. L. (2008). Talent management and employer branding : Retention battle strategies. The Icfaian Journal of Management Research, 8(11), 50-61.
  • Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. W., H. H., & Meglino, B. M. (1979). Review and concept analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin,14, 224-247
  • O'Brien, T. (2008). Flexible work practices and the IS sector: Balancing the needs of work and life? Library Management, 39(3), 199-228.
  • Patil, S. (2012). Talent Management & Retention. Nasik: Sandip Institute of Technology & Research Centre.
  • Peiker, S. (2010). Best practices for optimizing the talent pool in any economic climate. Wiley Periodicals, 31-37.
  • Perrin, T. (2003). Working today: Understanding what drives employee engagement. The 2003 Towers Perrin.
  • Prabhu, B. V. (2010). Attracting and retaining young engineers to. Curve - Bits Pilani, 74-81.
  • Gayathri, R., Sivaraman, G., & Kamalambal, R. (2012). Employee retention strategies in bpo's - an empirical investigation. Interdisciplinary Journal Of Contemporary Research in Business, 572-584.
  • Griffeth, R. W., & Hom, P. W. (1995). The employee turnover process. Research in personnel human resource management. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 13, 245-293.
  • Robinson, D. P. S. (2003). The drivers of employee engagement report. Institute for Employment Studies.
  • Kavitha, S. R.,Geetha, S. R., & Arunachalam, V. (2011). An empirical study on employee retention strategies in a biscuit manufacturing company in India. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporaray Research in Business, 3(4), 762-772.
  • Shelton, K. (2001). Effects of Employee Development Programs on Job Satisfaction and Employee Retention. Menomonie: The Graduate College University of Wisconsin -Stout.
  • Simon, S. S. (2012). The Essentials of Employee Engagement in Organisations. 63-72.
  • Snell, A. (2009). Tackling the challenges of employee engagement. Strategic HR Review.
  • Sridevi, S. M. (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(10).
  • Taleo Corporation Research. (2008). Talent management in a down economy. Retrieved from info@taleo.com
  • Taleo Research. (n.d.). Talent Management. Retrieved from Taleo Research: http:///G:/TM/what-talent-management. htm
  • Renugadevi, B. V. (2011). Employee engagement practices in Indian. Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research, 2(10), 134-411.
  • Wall, J., & Aijala, A. (2008). Why acquisition & retention strategies Don't Work? Deloitte Research, 1-15.

Abstract Views: 657

PDF Views: 2




  • A Review into Talent Management, Talent Retention and its Scope for Learning Organisations

Abstract Views: 657  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Amrita Bihani
B. K. Majumdar Institute of Business Administration, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Karishma dalal
H.L. Campus, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Abstract


"The demographic changes that we see occurring in many of the regions where we operate - shrinking populations, an ageing workforce and diversifying demographics - compound the challenges we face and intensify the war for talent."

Peter M. Senge, a senior lecturer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, first coined the term 'The Learning Organisation' in his famous book 'The Fifth Discipline: the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization' in the1990's. He said that a learning organisation is an organisation that has developed the continuous capacity to adapt and change. This means that the organisation views change not as a threat to resist, but as an opportunity to become more effective, flexible and responsive. For this to happen, he argues that organisations need to 'discover how to tap people's commitment and capacity to learn at all levels'. An organisation needs to attract, retain and nurture people who foster a sense of purpose, develop unique strategies, attract other committed people, have an ability to innovate and view work environment as a continual learning structure. Talent management is becoming increasingly crucial for such an organisation that endeavors to compete in this increasingly complex dynamic business environment that fosters disruptive technologies and shifts in customer preferences.

They say that a company is only as good as the quality of its talent. Indian companies today are grappling with double digit attrition rates which at 14% is more than the global average and that costs the organisation three to four times an individual's salary. Top turnover drivers in India include poor job definition, leadership quality, inefficient people management, non-competitive compensation, inadequate career advancement and work-life imbalance. Every organisation has high performers, employees who are head and shoulders above their co-workers in terms of the value they bring to the organisation. Sourcing and retaining such a workforce, contributing significantly to their career growth and aligning workers' productivity to support corporate objectives are some of the major challenges faced by organisations today. Today businesses are in a state of constant flux, they need to be agile enough to react quickly to a dynamic environment, while maintaining a long-term strategic focus. Despite continuing to be of significant interest and popularity of both academicians and practitioners alike, the content and practices of talent management have remained obscure. Talent management has always probed into effective attraction to retention of knowledgeable talent. Talent retention has now come to the fore as organisations realize that more and more to be levied on the existent talent workforce rather than attracting newer ones. According to a recent research by Monster.com, nearly 61% of the CEOs have employee satisfaction as an integral part of their goals whereas 80% of CEOs say that HR issues are core to a company's success. About 73% of CEOs spend a fourth of their time in talent development, with a similar percentage spending it on retention of the best performers. Talent management has become a headache for CEOs with only 30% saying that they have the talent they need to fulfil their future growth ambitions.

 Sylvia Vorhauser-Smith a leading columnist with the Forbes magazine states that money attracts but it does not retain, case in point being the low commitment, high turnover and the job-hopping frenzy of the modern Indian workforce. A recent Mercer survey backs this up with results showing that 54% of Indians are seriously considering leaving their present employer, the figure was just 26% in 2004, and this trend increases to 66% in the 16-24 year age bracket. Many of the generation next employees are unconvinced that excessive work demands are worth the sacrifices to their personal life. Perhaps then it is not surprising that career progression and training opportunities rank with pay as the top three factors motivating Indian employees to stay. And that means investments in talent management become a critical and strategic success factor in ensuring that Indian businesses can deliver. Salary increments are low-hanging fruit. Every employer can do that and there is no differentiation. Towers Watson India's director for talent and reward practices, Subeer Bakshi says that Employee Value Proposition (EVP) can be an effective tool in creating right balance between employee preferences and employer needs. Employers need to gauge if their EVP which includes but is not limited to performance recognition, learning&development, career, succession management, supporting work environments, setting clear expectations, being a coach and building on employees' strengths, fully utilising and recognising talent etc. are compelling and alluring enough.

 Talent management in India is a risk management strategy against the effect that it has on businesses having scarce or insufficient human resource capital to fulfil organisational requirements. Businesses today need to understand the cost of employee turnover because it causes the tangible and intangible costs to rise extensively. This includes the cost of not just of hiring the talent, but also the opportunity cost related to market losses, lead-time for actual delivery from new hires and productivity losses of individuals from affected teams. A look at the impact of talent constraints in India suggests that businesses have lost out in terms of cancelling or delaying key strategic initiatives. According to the 15th PwC Annual Global CEO Survey 41% of CEOs in India had to either cancel or delay a key strategic initiative and 39% of CEO's stated that their talent related expenses have raised more than expected. In such a scenario, both domestic Indian companies and multinational corporations operating in India have much ground to cover.

Developing, managing and retaining individuals as part of a planned talent management strategy are of utmost signifi cance. A recent newspaper article quoted Fortis Global Healthcare Holdings CEO Vishal Bali, saying that increasingly, in a competitive job market, head honchos are called upon to play the role of a chief talent offi cer where their challenge is to retain the best and build the rest. This is progressively becoming the guiding principle across Indian companies, whether entrepreneurial, professional or family-run. With Indian companies now in the throes of a high growth trajectory, talent management and talent retention are becoming key responsibilities. Efforts and talent practices should be routed towards creating higher retention to be able to be better equipped with talented workforce. Past research shows that talent management practices have the greatest return on investment when aligned with key success indicators of an organisation.

 This paper therefore deals with important needs and essence of Talent Retention in today's organisations which face intensive competition. It highlights the various facets of Talent Retention, its practices as well as depicts the various areas like commitment, satisfaction, hierarchical level of the employees etc., that retention needs to cater to and studying the relationship between the strategies that organisations implement and expectations of employees. These fi ndings would help learning organisations explore and analyse the best practices that need to be undertaken to understand talent management, whether the strategies that they have adopted are giving them an edge in adapting and accepting change and to promote learning as a positive necessary aspect of the company culture. It is inevitable to understand the nuances of an organisation without understanding its employees. Talent is important and organisations insist on the right kind of talent to be able to sustain competition and survive. Without having the right set of talent practices organisations may fall prey to competition which would invariably affect the survival of organisations.


Keywords


Learning Organisation, Talent Management, Talent Retention, Talent Strategies, Employee Value Proposition (EVP).

References