International Journal on Leadership

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Exploring Ethics in E-Marketing for Responsible Leadership


Affiliations
1 Department of Commerce, University of Jammu, J&K, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In the recent years, increased usage of the Internet has induced the marketers and customers for online selling and buying of products and services. E-marketing provides an opportunity to sell and purchase various brands of products having huge discounts; but at the same time, there are chances of frauds, deception, hacking, duplication, and other unethical practices in the e-marketing. This paper aims to explore the extent of customers’ perceived ethical virtues followed by the e-marketers for responsible leadership and dealing with customers. This empirical study is based upon the responses obtained from 200 customers through a questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised of demographic variables along with the Likert scale items representing the customers’ perceived ethical practices. The reliability and validity of data were duly assessed through various measures. The exploratory factor analysis summarised the variables into four factors namely security, non-deception, reliability, and privacy. The findings indicate that customers perceived e-marketers as moderately ethical and suggested for more security, privacy, and reliability through formulation of ethical codes, publicising the unethical practices of concerns by media, and proactive role of regulatory bodies in promoting ethics in e-marketing for protecting the interest of various stakeholders. It is obvious that ethical practices lead to customer satisfaction, enhanced performance, and positive word of mouth thus edifying trust, commitment, and loyalty to e-marketers. Contrary to this, unethical practices by e-marketers make the customers dissatisfied, reduce performance, and spread irresponsible leadership as well as negative word of mouth about the company, which seriously tarnish the image of the company in the eyes of all stakeholders. The study will be highly useful for researchers, practitioners, marketers, and policy makers with new insights for research and formulation of policies with regard to ethics in e-marketing.

Keywords

Customers, E-marketing, Ethics, Stakeholders, Leadership.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Barnes, S. J., & Scornavacca, E. (2004). Mobile marketing: The role of permission and acceptance. International Journal Mobile Communication, 2(2), 128-139.

  • Bush, V. S., Venable, B. T., & Bush, A. J. (2000). Ethics and marketing on the Internet: Practitioners’ perceptions of societal, industry and company concerns. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 237-248.

  • Citera, M., Beauregard, R., & Mitsuya, T. (2005). An experimental study of credibility in e-negotiations. Psychology & Marketing, 22, 163-179.

  • Creyer, E. H., & Ross, W. T. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421-432.

  • Culnan, M. J. (2000). Protecting privacy online: Is selfregulation working?. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing,19(1), 20-26.

  • Deckmyn, D. (1999). Critics say self-regulation effort may ‘legitimize’ spam. Computerworld, 33, 41-42.

  • Dommeyer, C. J., & Gross, B. L. (2003). What consumers know and what they do: An investigation of consumer knowledge, awareness, and use of privacy protection strategies. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(2), 34-51.

  • Freestone, O., & Mitchell, V. W. (2004). Generation Y attitudes towards e-ethics and internet-related misbehaviours. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 121–128.

  • Greblikaite, J., & Pervazaite, D. (2014). Ethical issues related to e-commerce: Case of discount e-shopping site in Lithuania. European Integration Studies, (8), 124-130.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Barry, J. B. Anderson, R. E., & Tathum, R. L. (2009), Multivariate Data Analysis (6th Ed.).Pearson Prentice Publishers, New Delhi.

  • Jackson, G., & Ahuja, V. (2016). Dawn of the digital age and the evolution of the marketing mix. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 17(3), 170-186.

  • Kannan, P. K. (2017). Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 22-45.

  • Malhotra, N. (2008). Marketing research, An applied orientation (5th Ed.). Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi.

  • Miyazaki, A. D., & Fernandez, A. (2001). Consumer perceptions of privacy and security risks for online shopping. The Journal of Consumer Affairs,35, 27-44.

  • Murphy, P. E. (2005). Consumer online privacy: Legal and ethical issues. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 7-19

  • Oghazi, P., Rana1, M. & Parida, V. (2012). Prioritization of service quality factors in e-purchasing - A cross cultural study. Journal of Advances in Management, 6.

  • Palmer, D. E. (2005). Pop-ups, cookies, and spam: Toward a deeper analysis of the ethical significance of internet marketing practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 271–280.

  • Palmer, D. E. (2017). Conceptions and Misconceptions of Virtue in Marketing. In Handbook of Virtue Ethics in Business and Management (pp. 1027-1035). Springer Netherlands.

  • Ramanathan, U., Ramanathan, U., Subramanian, N., Subramanian, N., Parrott, G., & Parrott, G. (2017). Role of social media in retail network operations and marketing to enhance customer satisfaction. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(1), 105-123.

  • Robert, O., & Humphrey, P. (2010). The structure of online marketing communication channels. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 2, 54-62.

  • Roman, S. (2007). The ethics of online retailing: A scale development and validation from the consumers’ perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 131–148.

  • Saleh, M. A. H. (2016). Website design, technological expertise, demographics, and consumer’s e-purchase transactions. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 8(1), 125.

  • Stewart, D. W., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). From consumer response to active consumer: Measuring the effectiveness of interactive media. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 376–396

  • Strauss, J., & Frost, R. (2010). E-Marketing (5th Ed.). PHI Learning Private Ltd.

  • Thorpe, A. S., & Roper, S. (2017). The ethics of gamification in a marketing context. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-13.

  • Tsai, J. Y., Egelman, S., Cranor, L. & Acquisti, A. (2011). The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Journal of Information Systems Research, 22(2), 254–268.

  • Wang, E. S. T. (2016). The moderating role of consumer characteristics in the relationship between website quality and perceived usefulness. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(6), 627-639.

  • Wang, Y. D., & Emurian, H. H. (2005). An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications, Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 105–125.


Abstract Views: 417

PDF Views: 0




  • Exploring Ethics in E-Marketing for Responsible Leadership

Abstract Views: 417  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Bodh Raj Sharma
Department of Commerce, University of Jammu, J&K, India

Abstract


In the recent years, increased usage of the Internet has induced the marketers and customers for online selling and buying of products and services. E-marketing provides an opportunity to sell and purchase various brands of products having huge discounts; but at the same time, there are chances of frauds, deception, hacking, duplication, and other unethical practices in the e-marketing. This paper aims to explore the extent of customers’ perceived ethical virtues followed by the e-marketers for responsible leadership and dealing with customers. This empirical study is based upon the responses obtained from 200 customers through a questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised of demographic variables along with the Likert scale items representing the customers’ perceived ethical practices. The reliability and validity of data were duly assessed through various measures. The exploratory factor analysis summarised the variables into four factors namely security, non-deception, reliability, and privacy. The findings indicate that customers perceived e-marketers as moderately ethical and suggested for more security, privacy, and reliability through formulation of ethical codes, publicising the unethical practices of concerns by media, and proactive role of regulatory bodies in promoting ethics in e-marketing for protecting the interest of various stakeholders. It is obvious that ethical practices lead to customer satisfaction, enhanced performance, and positive word of mouth thus edifying trust, commitment, and loyalty to e-marketers. Contrary to this, unethical practices by e-marketers make the customers dissatisfied, reduce performance, and spread irresponsible leadership as well as negative word of mouth about the company, which seriously tarnish the image of the company in the eyes of all stakeholders. The study will be highly useful for researchers, practitioners, marketers, and policy makers with new insights for research and formulation of policies with regard to ethics in e-marketing.

Keywords


Customers, E-marketing, Ethics, Stakeholders, Leadership.

References