Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Reterospective Analysis of Complications of Cesarean Section in Rural Western U.P.


Affiliations
1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Lala Shri Ram Hospital, Pilkhuwa Hapur, U.P., India
2 Department of Surgery, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Department of Anaesthesiology, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Background

Cesarean section(CS) is the most commonly performed obstetric surgical procedure throughout the world. Usually this is a life saving procedure for both mother as well as new born baby, but it also have some complications, related to both surgical and anaesthetical.

Aims & objectives

To evaluate different complications encountered during and after cesarean section within a period of 10 years at LSRH&SIMS and its management.

Materials & methods

An analysis of 8550 patients was done at LSRH&SIMS during 2000-2009. The patients who underwent cesarean section whether it was elective or emergency, cases booked or unbooked, done for various indications constituted the subject of study. The patients were analysed with respect to types of maternal morbidity encountered.

Results

In our study, we analysed 8550 deliveries during 2000 to2009, out of which 22% of patients were subjected for CS. Out of 22% of CS, 86.6% patients were operated as emergency and 13.3% as elective section. In present study, minor&major morbidity were seen in 33.3% of cases. Rest of the patients recovered without any problem in postoperative period.

Conclusion

In present study, incidence of CS was 22%. Most common indication for CS was foetal distress, followed by previous CS, prolonged labour, malpresentation&APH, etc. Incidence of maternal morbidity in this study was 33.3 %.


Keywords

Cesarean Section, Un-booked, Fetal Distress
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Buchholz NP, Daly- Gradeau E,Huber- Buchholz MM. Eur J Obs Reprod Biol; 1994 56(3):161-3
  • DonowitzLG, NorrisSM. Infectcontrol;1985: 6(5):189-93
  • Hamed AD, Dare Fo Int J Gyn & Obs; 1992:37(1):47-50
  • Jain S., S. Gupta. Ind. J Gyn & Obs; 1988:38, 3:261
  • MC Indoe AK,Hammond EJ,Babington PC.Br J Anaesth;1985:75 (1): 97-101
  • Naumann Rww,Hauth JC, Owen J, Hodgkins Pm, Lincton T Obs. & Gyn; 1995:5(3):412-6
  • Notzon F.C, Coles, Rev. F.R. Gyn &Obs;1985: 86(7-9) 503-10
  • Parker Km & Embry JH. Ala Med ; 1995:64(10):13-6
  • Taffel S.M. Am. J. Public Health; 1987: 77, 955- 9
  • Williams BT. South Med J; 1979: 72(8):1025-6

Abstract Views: 167

PDF Views: 0




  • Reterospective Analysis of Complications of Cesarean Section in Rural Western U.P.

Abstract Views: 167  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Namita Agarwal
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Lala Shri Ram Hospital, Pilkhuwa Hapur, U.P., India
Saurabh Goel
Department of Surgery, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Virendra B. Singh
Department of Surgery, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Ashutosh Niranjan
Department of Surgery, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Arati Srivastava
Department of Anaesthesiology, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


Background

Cesarean section(CS) is the most commonly performed obstetric surgical procedure throughout the world. Usually this is a life saving procedure for both mother as well as new born baby, but it also have some complications, related to both surgical and anaesthetical.

Aims & objectives

To evaluate different complications encountered during and after cesarean section within a period of 10 years at LSRH&SIMS and its management.

Materials & methods

An analysis of 8550 patients was done at LSRH&SIMS during 2000-2009. The patients who underwent cesarean section whether it was elective or emergency, cases booked or unbooked, done for various indications constituted the subject of study. The patients were analysed with respect to types of maternal morbidity encountered.

Results

In our study, we analysed 8550 deliveries during 2000 to2009, out of which 22% of patients were subjected for CS. Out of 22% of CS, 86.6% patients were operated as emergency and 13.3% as elective section. In present study, minor&major morbidity were seen in 33.3% of cases. Rest of the patients recovered without any problem in postoperative period.

Conclusion

In present study, incidence of CS was 22%. Most common indication for CS was foetal distress, followed by previous CS, prolonged labour, malpresentation&APH, etc. Incidence of maternal morbidity in this study was 33.3 %.


Keywords


Cesarean Section, Un-booked, Fetal Distress

References