Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Economic Impact Of Forest Management Institutions On Groundwater Recharge in Karnataka, India


Affiliations
1 Division of Resource Economics, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, Germany
2 Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore and Daad Visiting Professor, India
3 Agricultural Extension, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India
4 Adrt Center, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore, India
5 Karnataka forest Department, Bangalore, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Present study signifies relative hydrological and economic contribution of Joint Forest Planning and Management (JFPM) programme in semi-arid tropical India towards groundwater recharge. A majority of dugwells / open wells have failed to yield water in hardrock areas of India due to advent of deep borewells, low rainfall and poor recharge. Field data were collected for 2008 from a population of farmers possessing irrigation wells in selected villages with and without JFPM programme. Logarithmic net returns, descriptive statistics and ANOVA reveal that the net returns to land, irrigation water and expenditure for irrigation water increased due to groundwater recharge caused by the JFPM programme. JFPM has contributed towards 100 percent functioning of all borewells and dug wells with no negative externality in JFPM village valued in terms of well failure. Incremental net returns due to JFPM (of ` 13342 per acre) are at least 100 percent higher than that of watershed development Programme, WDP (of ` 6343 per acre) and JFPM + WDP (of ` 6822 per acre). Groundwater yield of dug wells was just 10 percent lower than that of deep borewells, demonstrating potential of JFPM in recharging dug wells. Groundwater cost was 35 per cent lower in JFPM compared with control village, due to groundwater recharge. Net return per rupee of cost of groundwater was the highest for JFPM dug well (` 11.3) followed by JFPM borewell (` 8.42), JFPM + WDP (` 3.26), WDP (` 3.05) and control farmers (` 1.04). JFPM has successfully recharged groundwater in irrigation wells and can be replicated in hard rock areas benefiting scores of farmers at relatively low cost.

Keywords

Joint Forest Planning And Management, Groundwater, Recharge, Watershed Development Programme, Externality And Hardrock Area.
Font Size

User
About The Authors

Vikram Patil
Division of Resource Economics, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin
Germany

M. G. Chandrakanth
Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore and Daad Visiting Professor
India

N. R. Gangadharappa
Agricultural Extension, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore
India

A. V. Manjunatha
Adrt Center, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore
India

B. Shivanagouda
Karnataka forest Department, Bangalore
India


Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications

Abstract Views: 214

PDF Views: 0




  • Economic Impact Of Forest Management Institutions On Groundwater Recharge in Karnataka, India

Abstract Views: 214  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Vikram Patil
Division of Resource Economics, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, Germany
M. G. Chandrakanth
Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore and Daad Visiting Professor, India
N. R. Gangadharappa
Agricultural Extension, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India
A. V. Manjunatha
Adrt Center, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore, India
B. Shivanagouda
Karnataka forest Department, Bangalore, India

Abstract


Present study signifies relative hydrological and economic contribution of Joint Forest Planning and Management (JFPM) programme in semi-arid tropical India towards groundwater recharge. A majority of dugwells / open wells have failed to yield water in hardrock areas of India due to advent of deep borewells, low rainfall and poor recharge. Field data were collected for 2008 from a population of farmers possessing irrigation wells in selected villages with and without JFPM programme. Logarithmic net returns, descriptive statistics and ANOVA reveal that the net returns to land, irrigation water and expenditure for irrigation water increased due to groundwater recharge caused by the JFPM programme. JFPM has contributed towards 100 percent functioning of all borewells and dug wells with no negative externality in JFPM village valued in terms of well failure. Incremental net returns due to JFPM (of ` 13342 per acre) are at least 100 percent higher than that of watershed development Programme, WDP (of ` 6343 per acre) and JFPM + WDP (of ` 6822 per acre). Groundwater yield of dug wells was just 10 percent lower than that of deep borewells, demonstrating potential of JFPM in recharging dug wells. Groundwater cost was 35 per cent lower in JFPM compared with control village, due to groundwater recharge. Net return per rupee of cost of groundwater was the highest for JFPM dug well (` 11.3) followed by JFPM borewell (` 8.42), JFPM + WDP (` 3.26), WDP (` 3.05) and control farmers (` 1.04). JFPM has successfully recharged groundwater in irrigation wells and can be replicated in hard rock areas benefiting scores of farmers at relatively low cost.

Keywords


Joint Forest Planning And Management, Groundwater, Recharge, Watershed Development Programme, Externality And Hardrock Area.