Journal of Organization and Human Behaviour

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Role of Perceived Organizational Support in Augmenting Self-Efficacy of Employees


Affiliations
1 Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study seeks to examine the impact of Perceived Organizational Support (POS) on the self-efficacy levels of employees and whether there are significant differences in the level of POS and self-efficacy based on gender, designation, and length of tenure of employees. POS is the perception of employees that their organization values their contribution and is also concerned about their well-being. Self-efficacy refers to an individual’s conviction in his ability to successfully execute a given task (Bandura, 1997). Self-efficacy fosters work commitment and self-efficacious employees accept challenging goals. The positive relationship between self-efficacy and job performance has been supported in many past studies. Hence, promoting self-efficacy among employees is vital for the sustainable growth of the organization. This study explores the effect of POS on the self-efficacy levels of the employees of IT Enabled Services (ITES) sector in India. Data collection was done through personally administered questionnaires from 312 employees of ITES companies in Bangalore. The results of the study indicate that POS has a significant positive impact on the self-efficacy levels of employees. This study has implications for the top management to focus on factors (timely support, rewards, appreciation, fairness, justice) contributing to POS. Further, it recommends that the management should provide self-efficacy training to the employees. Enhancing self-efficacy of employees can result in improved performance in the workplace and thereby lead to the competitive advantage of the organization.

Keywords

Perceived Organizational Support, Self-Efficacy, ITES Sector.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

  • Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38(1), 92-113.

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Editorial. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 8-10.

  • Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative Self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87-99.

  • Byrne, Z. S., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Perceived organizational support and performance relationships across levels of organizational cynicism. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(1), 54-72.

  • Caesens, G., & Stinglhamber, F. (2014). The relationship between perceived organizational support and work engagement: The role of self-efficacy and its outcomes. European Review of Applied Psychology, 64(5), 259-267.

  • Chaudhary, R., Rangnekar, S., & Barua, M. K. (2012). Impact of occupational self-efficacy on employee engagement: An Indian perspective. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 38(2), 329-338.

  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.

  • Einsenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 812-820.

  • Eisenberger, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.

  • Erdogan, B., & Enders, J. (2007). Support from the supervisors’ perceived organizational support as a moderator of leader-member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 321-330.

  • Fridrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotion in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotion. American psychologist, 56, 218-226.

  • Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 472-485.

  • Ghosh, D. (2013). Who is Grace?: Affect, Work, and Gender in Bangalore Call Centres. Globalizations, 10(3), 397-409.

  • Holden, G. (1991). The relationship of self-efficacy appraisals to subsequent health related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Social Work in Health Care, 16(1), 53-93.

  • Holden, G., Moncher, M. S., Schinke, S. P., & Barker, K. M. (1990). Self-efficacy of children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Psychological Reports, 66(3), 1044-1046.

  • Janjhua, Y., Chaudhary, R., & Chauhan, M. (2014). Relationship between employees’ self-efficacy belief and role stress: A study. Journal of Psychology, 5(2), 169-173.

  • Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386-408.

  • Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854-1884.

  • Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel psychology, 60(3), 541-572.

  • Luthans, K. W., Lebsack, S. A., & Lebsack, R. R. (2008). Positivity in healthcare: Relation of optimism to performance. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 22(2), 178-188.

  • Luthans, F., Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J., & Avey, J. B. (2008). The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate-employee performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 219-238.

  • Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., & Peterson, S. J. (2010). The development and resulting performance impact of positive psychological capital. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(1), 41-67.

  • Luthans, F., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2015). Psychological capital and beyond. Oxford, New York, NY, Oxford University Press.

  • Maurer, T. J., & Pierce, H. R. (1998). A comparison of Likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 324-329.

  • Parker, S. K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth Self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835-852.

  • Perrot, S., Bauer, T. N., Abonneau, D., Campoy, E., Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. (2014). Organizational socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: The moderating role of perceived organizational support. Group & Organization Management, 39(3), 247-273.

  • Randhawa, G. (2004). Self-efficacy and work performance: An empirical study. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 39, 336-346.

  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 698-714.

  • Rose, E., & Gillian Wright. (2005). Satisfaction and dimensions of control among call centre customer service representatives. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1), 136-160.

  • Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261.

  • Stajkovic, A. D., Lee, D., & Nyberg, A. J. (2009). Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 814-828.

  • Thompson, P., Warhurst, C., & Callaghan, G. (2001). Ignorant theory and knowledgeable workers: Interrogating the connections between knowledge, skills and services. Journal of Management studies, 38(7), 923-942.


Abstract Views: 289

PDF Views: 0




  • Role of Perceived Organizational Support in Augmenting Self-Efficacy of Employees

Abstract Views: 289  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Seena Nikhil
Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
J. Arthi
Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


This study seeks to examine the impact of Perceived Organizational Support (POS) on the self-efficacy levels of employees and whether there are significant differences in the level of POS and self-efficacy based on gender, designation, and length of tenure of employees. POS is the perception of employees that their organization values their contribution and is also concerned about their well-being. Self-efficacy refers to an individual’s conviction in his ability to successfully execute a given task (Bandura, 1997). Self-efficacy fosters work commitment and self-efficacious employees accept challenging goals. The positive relationship between self-efficacy and job performance has been supported in many past studies. Hence, promoting self-efficacy among employees is vital for the sustainable growth of the organization. This study explores the effect of POS on the self-efficacy levels of the employees of IT Enabled Services (ITES) sector in India. Data collection was done through personally administered questionnaires from 312 employees of ITES companies in Bangalore. The results of the study indicate that POS has a significant positive impact on the self-efficacy levels of employees. This study has implications for the top management to focus on factors (timely support, rewards, appreciation, fairness, justice) contributing to POS. Further, it recommends that the management should provide self-efficacy training to the employees. Enhancing self-efficacy of employees can result in improved performance in the workplace and thereby lead to the competitive advantage of the organization.

Keywords


Perceived Organizational Support, Self-Efficacy, ITES Sector.

References