Journal of Organization and Human Behaviour

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparison between Public and Private Sector Executives on Key Psychological Aspects


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore.
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Although, much of the debate is centered around structural differences of business sectors due to the emergence of liberalization and globalization policies in almost all spheres of business fields, hardly any research studies have been reported on existence of significant difference between public sector and private sector on psychological aspects. The present study, is aimed at investigating whether any significant difference exists between the public sector and private sector executives on various psychological aspects such as occupational stress, job involvement, hardiness and burnout. Data obtained from 60 (public and private sector) executives on the four key psychological aspects revealed that significant difference exists between the private and public sector executives. Private sector executives are more likely to have higher levels of occupational stress particularly in terms of role conflict, unreasonable group conflict and responsibility for persons. Further, the private sector executives tend to have higher levels of job involvement and hardiness personality and, lesser levels of emotional exhaustion (burn-out) than the public sector executives. Implications in terms of policy making, stress management program, hardiness training and ways to avert burnout are discussed.

Keywords

Public And Private Sector Executives, Occupational Stress, Burnout, Job Involvement, Hardiness
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ahmad S, Ahmad H (1992). Role stress and work satisfaction: a study on middle managers. Indian Psychiatry J., 1(6): 110-115.

  • Aminabhavi, Vijayalaxmi A., and Triveni (2000). Varibles causing occupational stress in nationalized and non-nationalized bank employees. Journal of community guidance and research, 17 (1), 20-29.

  • Ahola . K., Honkonen .T., Isometsa .E., Kalimo .R ., Nykyri .E., Koskinen. S., Aromaa. A ., Lönnqvist. H.(2006). Burnout in General Population. Social Psychiatry Epidemiol, 41, 11-17.

  • Baldwin, J.N. (1990). Perceptions of Public versus Private Sector Personnel and Informal Red Tape: Their Impact on Motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 20, pp. 7-28.

  • Barton, M.F. And Waldron, D.G. (1978). Differences in Risk Preference between the Public and Private Sectors. Human Resource Management, 17, pp. 2-4.

  • Becker, B.W. And Connor, P.E. (2005). Self-selection or Socialization of Public- and Private-Sector Managers? A Cross-cultural Values Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 58, pp. 111–113.

  • Belante, D. And Link, A.N. (1981). Are Public Sector Workers More Risk Averse Than Private Sector Workers? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 34, pp. 408-412.

  • Buchanan, B. (1974). Government Managers, Business Executives, and Organizational Commitment. Public Administration Review, 34, pp. 339-347.

  • Bogg, J. And Cooper, C. (1995). Job Satisfaction, Mental Health, and Occupational Stress among Senior Civil Servants. Human Relations, 48, pp. 327-341.

  • Bozeman, B., Reed, P.N. And Scott, P. (1992). Red Tape and Task Delays in Public and Private Organizations. Administration & Society, 24, pp. 290-322.

  • Bozeman, B. And Kingsley, G. (1998). Risk Culture in Public and Private Organizations. Public Administration Review, 58, pp. 109-118.

  • Buelens . M. and Van den Broeck.H. (2007). An Analysis of Differences in Work motivation in Public and Private Sector Organization. Public Administration Review.

  • Burke, Ronald J. & Esther R. Greenglass (1998a). Organization support during Health Care Downsizing and Restructuring. York University, mimeo.

  • Burke, Ronald J. & Esther R. Greenglass (1998b). Union support during organizational restructuring. York University, mimeo.

  • Cordes, C.L. and T.W. Dougherty (1993). A Review and an Inte-gration of Research on Job Burnout. Academy of Management Review, 18, 621-56.

  • Dubin R (1956). A study of the "central life interests" of industrial workers. Social Problems, 3, 131-142.

  • Francis.S (2011). Sectoral Impact Analysis of the ASEAN- India Free Trade Agreement. Economic and Political Weekly, 46 (2).

  • Feeney. M.K. and Rainey, (2009). Personnel Flexibility and Red Tape in Public and Non Profit Organizations: Distinctions due to Institutional and Political Accountability. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.

  • Gurin G, Veroff J, Field S (1960). Americans view their mental health. New York: Basic Books.

  • Marie L. Griffin, Nancy L. Hogan, Eric G. Lambert, Kasey A. Tucker-Gail and David N. Baker (2010). Job Involvement, Job Stress, Job Satisfaction and Organizational commitment and the Burnout of correctional staff. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 239-255.

  • Golembiewsk, R.T, R.A, Bouedreau, Ben-Chu Sun and Huaping Luo (1998). Estimates of Burnout in public agencies worldwide: How many employees have which degrees of burnout and what consequences?. Public Administration Review, 58.

  • Houston, D.J. (2000). Public-Service Motivation: A Multivariate Test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, pp. 713-727.

  • Jorde-Bloom, P. (1982). Avoiding burnout: Strategies for managing time, space, and people in early childhood education. Washington, DC: Acropolis Books

  • Kobasa SC (1979). Stressful life events, personality and health: An inquiry into hardiness. J. Personality Soc. Psychol., 37,1-11.

  • Kobasa SC (1982). Commitment and coping in stress resistance among Lawyers. J. Personality Soc. Psychol., 42,702-717.

  • Kobasa SC, Maddi SR, Puccetti MC (1982). Personality and exercise as buffers in the stress-illness relationship. J. Behav. Med., 5,391-404.

  • Khan.K., Nemati A.R (2011). Impact of Job involvement on employee satisfaction: A study based on medical doctors working at Riphah International University Teaching Hospitals in Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management 5, 2241-2246.

  • Lodahl TM, Kejner M (1965). The definitional and measurement of job involvement. J. Appl. Psychology., 49,24-33.

  • Lyons, S.T., Duxbury, L.E. And Higgins, Ch.A. (2006).A Comparison of the Values and Commitment of Private Sector, Public Sector, and Para public Sector Employees. Public Administration Review, 6, pp. 605-618.

  • Malik. N (2011). A Study on occupational stress experienced by private and public banks employees in Quetta City. African Journal of Business Management, 5, 3063-3070.

  • Malta. M (2004). Stress at Work, a Concept in Stress Human Factors Limited. Bus. Psychol. Strateg. Dev.,33(6): 125-133.

  • Macklin.D.S, Smith.A.L, Dollard.F.M (2006). Public and Private sector work stress: Workers compensation, levels of distress and job satisfaction and the demand-control support model, Australian Journal of Psychology, 58 (3).

  • Hasnain, .I. Naz, Bano.S. (2010). Stress and well-being of lawyers. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 36, 165-168.

  • Maghradi A (1999). Assessing the effect of job satisfaction non managers. Int. J. Vaule-Based Manage 12(1): 1-12.

  • McKinley, W., C.M. Sanchez and A.G.Schick (1995). Organizational Downsizing: Constraining, Cloning and Learning'. Academy Management Executive. 9, 32-42.

  • Maslach, C., (1993). Burnout: A Multidimensional perspective. In W.B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach and T. Marek (eds), Professional Burnout: Recent Development in theory and research. Taylor and Francis: Washinton D.C.

  • Maslach C, Leiter MP (1999). Teacher burnout: A research agenda. In: Vandenberghe R, Huberman AM (eds) Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice.

  • Cambridge University Press: Cambridge UK, pp. 295-303. Manlove E (1993) Multiple correlates of burnout in child care workers. Early Childhood Res. Q 8(4): 499-518.

  • Murray, M.A. (1975). Comparing Public and Private Management: An Exploratory Essay. Public Administration Review, 35, pp. 364-371.

  • Nutt, P.C. (2006). Comparing Public and Private Sector Decision-Making Practices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, pp. 289-318.

  • Paine, F.T, S.J. Carroll and B. Lecte (1996). Need satisfaction of managerial level personnel in a government agency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 247-249.

  • Pines, A. & Maslach, C. (1978). Characteristics of staff burnout in mental health settings. Hospital and Community Psychology, 29, 233-237.

  • Perry, J.L. and Rainey, H.G. (1988). The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 13, pp.182-201.

  • Raju. M.V.R, Seema. N.D.S (2008). Physical and Mental Health problems among steel plant employees of vishakapatman. International research journal of social sciences, 1,135-144.

  • Raju. M.V.R (2006). Ability Support Model and Role Stress. IBAT Journal of Management, 3, 20-36.

  • Rainey, H.G., Back off, R.W. And Levine, C.H. (1976). Comparing Public and Private Organizations. Public Administration Review, 36, pp. 233-244.

  • Rainey, H.G., Traut, C. And Blunt, B. (1986). Reward Expectancies and Other Work-Related Attitudes in Public and Private Organizations: A Review and Extension. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 6, pp. 50-72.

  • Rainey, H.G. And Bozeman, B (2000). Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, pp. 447-469.

  • Rainey, H.G. And Chun, Y.H. (2005). Public and Private Management Compared in E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn, Jr., and Ch. Pollitt (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Rainey, H.G. (1983). Public Agencies and Private Firms: Incentive Structures, Goals and Individual Roles. Administration & Society, 15, pp. 207–242.

  • Rush.M.C., Schoel.W.A., Barnard.SM. (2002). Psychological Resiliency in Public Sector : Hardiness and Pressure for change. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46.

  • Shilpi.G. and Ruchi.G (2009). Stress level among teachers of public and private sector institutions: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management Issue, 2, 454-467.

  • Seema.N.D.S and Raju.M.V.R ( 2009). Prevalence of low back pain, sleeplessness and headache towards occupational stress. Edited Book, Health Psychology and Counselling, Discovery Publishing House, 203-227.

  • Schneider, S.D. and R.C.C. Vaught (1993). A comparison of Job Satisfaction between Public and Private sector managers. PAQ Spring.

  • Specter,Paul.E. (2002). Employee control and occupational stress. Current directions in psychological science, 11, 133-136.

  • Shultz. S.K., Wang, Olson.A.D (2009). Role overload and underload in relation to occupational stress and health. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Saha, Biswas, Sanghul, Sheetal and Mukherjee, Indrani (2002). Occupational stress of male general physicians and their gender role identity. Journal of Psychometry, 14, 37-44.

  • Smith,M.P., L.M. Kendall, and C.L. Hulin (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement: a strategy for the study of attitudes. Chicago. Rand McNally.

  • Sudha.G (2011). A study on Organizational commitment and Job involvement. Journal of Current computer science and technology, 1, 1-9.

  • Solomon, Esther.E (1986). Private and Public sector managers: an empirical investigation of job characteristics and organizational climate. Journal of applied psychology. 71, 247-259.

  • Tang C.H, Yen W.Y, Liu M.C, Tsai C.H., Hsu J.H. (2011). Association of employees types of employment and their Burnout status in Public and Private sectors in Taiwan. Taiwan J Public Health, 30, 230-244.

  • Tansel.A. (2005). Public and Private Employement Choice, Wage Differences and Gender in Turkey. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 53, 453-457.

  • Tsigilis. N., Zachopoulou.E., Grammatikopoulos.V,. (2006). Job Satisfaction and Burnout among greek early educators: A comparison between the public and private sector employees. Educational Research and Review. 1, 256-261.

  • Vigoda-Gadot, E. And Kapun, D. (2005). Perceptions of Politics and Perceived Performance in Public and Private Organizations: A Test of One Model Across Two Sectors. Policy & Politics, 33, pp. 251-276.

  • Wiebe, D. J., and Williams, P. G. (1992). Hardiness and health: A social psychophysiological perspective on stress and adaptation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology11, 238-262.


Abstract Views: 411

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparison between Public and Private Sector Executives on Key Psychological Aspects

Abstract Views: 411  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Somasundaram Subramanian
Department of Psychology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore.
J. Kruthika
Department of Psychology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore.

Abstract


Although, much of the debate is centered around structural differences of business sectors due to the emergence of liberalization and globalization policies in almost all spheres of business fields, hardly any research studies have been reported on existence of significant difference between public sector and private sector on psychological aspects. The present study, is aimed at investigating whether any significant difference exists between the public sector and private sector executives on various psychological aspects such as occupational stress, job involvement, hardiness and burnout. Data obtained from 60 (public and private sector) executives on the four key psychological aspects revealed that significant difference exists between the private and public sector executives. Private sector executives are more likely to have higher levels of occupational stress particularly in terms of role conflict, unreasonable group conflict and responsibility for persons. Further, the private sector executives tend to have higher levels of job involvement and hardiness personality and, lesser levels of emotional exhaustion (burn-out) than the public sector executives. Implications in terms of policy making, stress management program, hardiness training and ways to avert burnout are discussed.

Keywords


Public And Private Sector Executives, Occupational Stress, Burnout, Job Involvement, Hardiness

References