Journal of Organization and Human Behaviour

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Strategic Orientations and Organisational Types: A Theoretical Link


Affiliations
1 School of Professional Advancement, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
2 School of Business and Economics, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The aim of this study is to explore the extant literature with respect to the effect of organisational types on SO-performance relationship. The type of an organisation is a mental model or metaphorical representation manifested through the structural characteristics such as systems, processes, nature of business and workforce. It is also manifested through values, norms, shared vision (known as culture) and strategic orientations. Authors of this study therefore firmly believe and propose a significant connection between type of organisation and SO-performance relationship. The paper discusses this conceptual link through the review of literature systematically based on last three years research publications i.e. 2010-2012. Firstly, authors highlight the existence of SO-performance relationships and then purport the links between frequently cited SOs and organisational types. The study concludes with several propositions based on a theoretical framework and provokes attention of future researchers towards this crucial issue.

Keywords

SOs, Organisational Types, Mechanistic, Organic, Political, Organisational Performance, Adaptive Learning, Generative Learning
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Akhter, S. H., & Barcellos, P. F. P. (2011). Can Brazilian firms survive the Chinese challenge?: Effects of globalization on markets, strategies, and performance. European Business Review, 23(5), 502-523.

  • Al-Adaileh, R. M., & Al-Atawi, M. S. (2011). Organizational culture impact on knowledge exchange: Saudi Telecom context. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 212-230.

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational Learning. Reading: MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. (2001). An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization Science, 12(1), 54-74.

  • Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.27(4), 411-427.

  • Barney. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

  • Baker, W. E, & Sinkula, J. M. (2009). The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small Businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 443-464.

  • Bhatnagar, J., Budhwar, P., Srivastava, P., & Saini, D. S. (2010). Organizational change and development in India: a case of strategic organizational change and transformation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(5), 485-499.

  • Bennett, R., & Savani, S. (2011). Complaints-handling procedures of human services charities: Prevalence, antecedents, and outcomes of strategic approaches. Managing Service Quality, 21(5), 484-510.

  • Becherer, R. C., & Maurer, J. G. (1997). The moderating effect of environmental variables on the entrepreneurial and marketing orientation of entrepreneur-led firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(1), 47-58.

  • Bhuian, S. N., Menguc, B., & Bell, S. J. (2005). Just entrepreneurial enough: the moderating effect of entrepreneurship on the relationship between market orientation and performance. Journal of Business Research, 58(1), 9-17.

  • Cadogan, J. W., Sundqvist, S., Puumalainen, K., & Salminen, R. T. (2012). Strategic flexibilities and export performance: The moderating roles of export market-oriented behavior and the export environment. European Journal of Marketing, 46(10), 1418-1452.

  • Albacete-Sáez, C. A., Fuentes-Fuentes, M.M. & Bojica, A.M. (2011). Quality management, strategic priorities and performance: the role of quality leadership. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(8), 1173 – 1193.

  • Cassia, L., Massis, A. D., & Pizzurno, E. (2012). Strategic innovation and new product development in family firms: An empirically grounded theoretical framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour& Research, 18(2), 198 – 232.

  • Chatzoglou, P. D., Diamantidis, A. D., Vraimaki, E., Vranakis, S. K., & Kourtidis, D. A. (2011). Aligning IT, strategic orientation and organizational structure. Business Process Management Journal, 17(4), 663-687.

  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537.

  • Day, G. (1994). The capabilities of market driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58, 37-52.

  • Doherty, N. F., Champion, D., & Wang, L. (2010). An holistic approach to understanding the changing nature of organisational structure. Information Technology and People, 23(2), 116-135.

  • Dorothy, L. B., (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125.

  • Ellinger, A., Shin, H., Northington, W. M., Adams, F. G., Hofman, D., & O’Marah, K. (2012). The influence of supply chain management competency on customer satisfaction and shareholder value. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(3), 249-262.

  • Escriba-Esteve, A., Sanchez-Peinado, L., & Sanchez- Peinado, E. (2008). Moderating influences on the firm’s strategic orientation-performance relationship. International Small Business Journal, 26, 463-489.

  • Esper, T. L., Defee, C. C., & Mentzer, J. T. (2010). A framework of supply chain orientation. International Journal of Logistics Management, 21(2), 161-179.

  • Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2009). Making Sense of Change Management: A Complete Guide to the Models, Tools and Techniques of Organizational Change. London: Kogan Page, Limited

  • Flint, G.D. & Van Fleet, D.D. (2005). A Comparison and Contrast of Strategic Management and Classical Economic Concepts: Definitions, Comparisons, and Pursuit of Advantages. Retrieved from http://www.uvsc. edu/schools/business/facultyScholar/jbi/jbi_v3.html.

  • Fritz, W. (1996). Market orientation and corporate success: findings from Germany. European Journal of Marketing, 30(8), 59-74.

  • Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J-M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 77–90.

  • Griffith, D., Kiessling, T., & Dabic, M. (2012). Aligning strategic orientation with local market conditions: Implications for subsidiary knowledge management. International Marketing Review, 29(4), 379-402.

  • Grinstein, A. (2008). The relationships between market orientation and alternative strategic orientations: a meta- analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 42(1/2), 115-134.

  • Hamel, G. P., & Prahalad C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 122-128.

  • Han, Jin K., Namwoon Kim, and Rajendra K. Srivastava (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link. Journal of Marketing, 62 (4), 30–45.

  • Harris, L.C., & Ogbonna, E. (2001). Strategic human resource management, market orientation, and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 51, 157-66

  • Haro-Domínguez, C., Ortega-Egea, T., & Tamayo-Torres, I. (2010). Proactive orientation and its influence for technology acquisition. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 110(7), 953-970.

  • Hult, T., & Ketchen, D. (2001). Does market orientation matter. A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 899-906.

  • Ismail, A.I., Rose, R. C., Abdullah, H., & Uli, J. (2010). The relationship between organisational competitive advantage and performance moderated by the age and size of firms. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 15(2), 157–173.

  • Jaakson, K., Tamm, D., & Hämmal, G. (2011). Organisational innovativeness in Estonian biotechnology organisations. Baltic Journal of Management, 6(2), 205-226.

  • Jeffers, P. I. (2010). Embracing sustainability: information technology and the strategic leveraging of operations in third-party logistics. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 30(3), 260-287.

  • Jiménez-Zarco, A. I., Martínez-Ruiz, M. P., & Izquierdo- Yusta, A. (2011). The impact of market orientation dimensions on client cooperation in the development of new service innovations. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 43-67.

  • Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 47(3), 53-70

  • Kathuria, R., Partovi, F. Y., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2010). Leadership practices, competitive priorities, and manufacturing group performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 30(10), 1080-1105.

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations. (2nd Edition). New York: Wiley. King, A.W. (2007). Disentangling interfirm and intrafirm causal ambiguity: A conceptual model of causal ambiguity and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), pp. 156-178.

  • Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 24–41.

  • Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.

  • Lam, (2004). Organizational Innovation. Oxford University Press.

  • Langabeer II, J. R., & DelliFraine, J. (2011). Does CEO optimism affect strategic process? Management Research Review, 34(8), 857-868.

  • Li, Y., Su, Z., Liu, Y., & Li, M. (2011). Fast adaptation, strategic flexibility and entrepreneurial roles. Chinese Management Studies, 5(3), 256-271.

  • Liu, N. C., Roth, A. V., & Rabinovich, E. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of combinative competitive capabilities in manufacturing. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 31(12), 1250-1286.

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.

  • MA, H. (1999a). Anatomy of competitive advantage: a SELECT framework Management Decision, 37(9), 709-718.

  • MA, H. (1999b). Creation and preemption for competitive advantage. Management Decision, 37(3), pp. 259-267.

  • MA, H. (2004). Toward global competitive advantage: Creation, competition, cooperation and co-option. Management Decision, 42(7), 907-924.

  • Marchesi, G. A., (2008). The organization as a person: Utilizing metaphoric analysis to transform organizations. Leadership Advance Online Winter,15, 1-10.

  • Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Jr. Cleman, H. J. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure and Policies. The Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546-562.

  • Morgan, G. (Ed.). (1986). Images of Organizations. London. Sage.

  • Morris, L. E., & Williams, C. R. (2012). A behavioral framework for highly effective technical executives. Team Performance Management, 18(3/4), 210-230.

  • Nandakumar, M., Ghobadian, A., & O’Regan, N. (2011). Generic strategies and performance–evidence from manufacturing firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(3), 222-251.

  • Narver J. C. & Slater, S, F, (1990). The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54( 4), 20-35.

  • Nazdrol, M. W., Breen, J., & Josiassen, A. (2011).The relationship between strategic orientation and SME firm performance : Developing a conceptual framework. Regional Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 2011:Proceedings of the 8th AGSE International Entrepreneurship Research Exchange, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia. 713-724.

  • Noble, Charles H., Rajiv K. Sinha, and Ajith Kumar (2002). Market orientation and alternative strategic orientations: A longitudinal assessment of performance implications. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 25–39.

  • Ormrod, R. P. &Henneberg, S.C. (2011). Political market orientation and strategic party postures in Danish political parties. European Journal of Marketing, 45(6), 852 – 881.

  • Owusu-Frimpong, N., & Nwankwo, S. (2012). Service quality orientation: an approach to diffusing mindfulness in SMEs. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 29(6), 681-698.

  • Paiva, E. L., Gutierrez, E. R., & Roth, A. V. (2012). Manufacturing strategy process and organizational knowledge: a cross-country analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(2), 302-328.

  • Parnell, J. A., Lester, D. L., Long, Z., & Köseoglu, M. A. (2012). How environmental uncertainty affects the link between business strategy and performance in SMEs: Evidence from China, Turkey, and the USA. Management Decision, 50(4), 546-568.

  • Piercy, N. F., Haris, L. C., & Lane, N. (2002). Market orientation and retail operative’s expectations. Journal of Business Research, 55, 261-273

  • Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Pleshko, L. & Nickerson, I. (2008). Strategic orientation, organizational structure, and the associated effects on performance in industrial firms. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 7, 95-110.

  • Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.

  • Porter, M.E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(8), 95-117.

  • Powell, TC. (1992). Organizational alignment as competi-tive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 119-134.

  • Chatzoglou, P. D., Diamantidis, A. D., Vraimaki, E., Vranakis, S. K., & Kourtidis, D. A. (2011). Aligning IT, strategic orientation and organizational structure, Emerald 17.

  • Racela, O. C., Chaikittisilpa, C., & Thoumrungroje, A. (2007). Market orientation, international business relationships and perceived export performance. International Marketing Review, 24(2), 144-163.

  • Rajala, R., Westerlund, M., & Möller, K. (2012). Strategic flexibility in open innovation–designing business models for open source software. European Journal of Marketing, 46(10), 1368-1388.

  • Rao, P. (2011). E-learning in India: the role of national culture and strategic implications. Multicultural Education and Technology Journal, 5(2), 129-150.

  • Riviezzo, A. (2012). Acquisitions in Knowledge-Intensive Industries: Exploring the Distinctive Characteristics of the Effective Acquirer. Management Research Review, 36(2), 5-5.

  • Ryan, A., Tilbury, D., Corcoran, P. B., Abe, O., & Nomura, K. (2010). Sustainability in higher education in the Asia-Pacific: developments, challenges, and prospects. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(2), 106-119.

  • Sahney, S., Banwet, D., & Karunes, S. (2010). Quality framework in education through application of interpretive structural modeling: An administrative staff perspective in the Indian context. The TQM Journal, 22(1), 56-71.

  • Sange, P., (1990). The fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Currency: Doubleday.

  • Slater, S. F., & Olson, E. M. (2000). Strategy Type and Performance: The influence of sales force management. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 813-829.

  • Shoham, A., Rose, G.M., & Kropp, F. (2005). Market orientation and performance: a meta-analysis. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 23 (5), 435-454

  • Wu, S. J., Melnyk, S. A., & Swink, M. (2012). An empirical investigation of the combinatorial nature of operational capabilities: Compensatory or addictive? International Journal of operations and production management.

  • Secundo, G., Margherita, A., Elia, G., & Passiante, G. (2010). Intangible assets in higher education and research: mission, performance or both? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(2), 140-157.

  • Shin, S., & Aiken, K. D. (2012). The mediating role of marketing capability: evidence from Korean companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 24(4), 658-677.

  • Sinkovics, R., & Roath, A. (2004). Strategic orientation, capabilities, and performance in manufacturer-3PL relationships. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(2), 43-64

  • St-Pierre, J., & Audet, J. (2011). Intangible assets and performance: Analysis on manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(2), 202-223.

  • Stalk, G. (1988). Time— The next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 41-51.

  • Taylor, F., (1911). Principles and methods of scientific management. Journal of Accountancy, 12/2, 117-24.

  • Todorovic, Z. W., & Ma, J.(2008). Entrepreneurial and market orientation relationship to performance. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 2 (1), 21.

  • Van Raaij, E. M., & Stoelhorst, J. (2008). The implementation of a market orientation: A review and integration of the contributions to date. European Journal of Marketing, 42(11/12), 1265-1293.

  • Venkatraman, N. (1990). Information Technology Business Reconfiguration: The NeW Strategic Management Challenge . In Scott Morton (ed.). The corporation of 1990s. Oxford University Press (Forthcoming).

  • Wu, S. J., Melnyk, S. A., & Swink, M. (2012). An empirical investigation of the combinatorial nature of operational practices and operational capabilities: Compensatory or additive? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(2), 121-155.

  • Yang, J. (2012). Identifying the attributes of blue ocean strategies in hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(5), 701-720.

  • Zhang D. D. & Bruning E., (2011).Personal characteristics and strategic orientation: entrepreneurs in Canadian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour& Research, 17(1) 82 – 103


Abstract Views: 553

PDF Views: 0




  • Strategic Orientations and Organisational Types: A Theoretical Link

Abstract Views: 553  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Syed Shahid Hussain
School of Professional Advancement, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
Sarwar M. Azhar
School of Business and Economics, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
Maham Shahid
School of Business and Economics, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

Abstract


The aim of this study is to explore the extant literature with respect to the effect of organisational types on SO-performance relationship. The type of an organisation is a mental model or metaphorical representation manifested through the structural characteristics such as systems, processes, nature of business and workforce. It is also manifested through values, norms, shared vision (known as culture) and strategic orientations. Authors of this study therefore firmly believe and propose a significant connection between type of organisation and SO-performance relationship. The paper discusses this conceptual link through the review of literature systematically based on last three years research publications i.e. 2010-2012. Firstly, authors highlight the existence of SO-performance relationships and then purport the links between frequently cited SOs and organisational types. The study concludes with several propositions based on a theoretical framework and provokes attention of future researchers towards this crucial issue.

Keywords


SOs, Organisational Types, Mechanistic, Organic, Political, Organisational Performance, Adaptive Learning, Generative Learning

References