Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Moderating Influence of Emotional Intelligence on Organisational Citizenship Behaviour and Counterproductive Work Behaviour


Affiliations
1 Masters Organisational Psychology
2 Amity Institute of Psychology & Allied Sciences, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Emotions play a significant role in the organisational setting. It helps in building the social relationships which fosters the commitment of the employees towards the organisation which in turn affect the productivity of the organisation. The purpose of the present study was to understand the influence the emotional intelligence on organisational citizenship behaviour and counterproductive work behaviour. A total of 110 participants were taken. It was hypothesised that emotional intelligence would play a moderating role and would be positively correlated with organisational citizenship behaviour, and negatively correlated with counterproductive work behaviour. The results confirmed the moderating role of emotional intelligence on the influence of organisation citizenship behaviour with counterproductive work behaviour.

Keywords

Emotional Intelligence, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, Counterproductive Work Behaviour.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aguinis, H., Beauty, J. C., Boik, R. J., & Pierce, C. A. (2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30–year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 94–107.
  • Ameen, E. C., Guffey, D. M., & McMillan, J. J. (1996). Gender differences in determining the ethical sensitivity of future accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(5), 591–597.
  • Andreoli, N., & Lefkowitz, J. (2009). Individual and organizational antecedents of misconduct in organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 309–332.
  • Aquino, K., Lewis, U., & Bradfield, M. (1999). Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviant: A proposed model and empirical test. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1073–1091.
  • Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in realworld settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322.
  • Becker, D., Rundall, J., & Ulstad, I. (2009). The ethic of care and student cheating. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 14, 204–209.
  • Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–572.
  • Bhatnagar, J., & Biswas, S. (2010). Predictors and outcomes of employee engagement: Implications of the resource-based view perspective. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(2), 273–288.
  • Boddy, C. R. (2006). The dark side of management decision: Organisational Psychopaths. Management Decision, 44(9/10), 1461–1475.
  • Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Niehoff, B. P. (2004). The other side of the story: Reexamining prevailing assumptions about organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 229–246.
  • Bowling, N. A., & Eschleman, K. J. (2010) Employee personality as a moderator of the relationship between work stressors and counterproductive work behaviour. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 91–103.
  • Bowling, N. A., & Hammond, G. D. (2008). A metaanalytic examination of the construct validity of the Michigan Organizational Assesssment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 63–77
  • Callan, V. J., & Hartel, C. E. J. (2003). Workplace conflict, bullying, and counterproductive behaviours. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11(4), 283–301.
  • Chang, K., Nguyen, B., Cheng, K. T., Kuo, C. C., & Lee, I. (2016). HR practice, organisational commitment & citizenship behaviour. Employee Relations, 38(6), 907–926.
  • Chao, M., Shih, C. T., & Hsu, S. F. (2016). Nurse occupational burnout and patient-rated quality of care: The boundary conditions of emotional intelligence and demographic profiles. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 13(1), 156–165.
  • Cohen, A. (2016). Are they among us? A conceptual framework of the relationship between the dark triad personality and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs). Human Resource Management Review, 26(1), 69.
  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Mueller, J. S. (2007). Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 666–680.
  • Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–1255.
  • Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 291–309.
  • Gabriel, A. S., Diefendorff, J. M., Bennett, A. A., & Sloan, M. D. (2017). It’s about time. Organizational Research Methods, 20(1), 32.
  • Greenidge, D., & Coyne, I. (2014). Job stressors and voluntary work behaviours: Mediating effect of emotion and moderating roles of personality and emotional intelligence. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(4), 479–495.
  • Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1), 30–42.
  • Holladay, C. L., Halverson, S. K., Strong, M. H., Quinones, M. A., & Caplinger, J. A. (2004). Organizational citizenship bhevaiour and salary: The moderating effects of employee race, gender, and job level. A paper presented at the 19th Annual Conferenceof the Society of Industrial-Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
  • Johnson, J. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 984–996.
  • Lambert, S. J. (2006). Both art and science: Employing organizational documentation in workplace-based research. In M. Pitt-Catsouphes, E. E. Kossek, & S. Sweet (Eds.), The work and family handbook: Multidisciplinary perspectives, methods, and approaches (pp. 503–525). Routledge.
  • Lyons, J. B., & Schneider, T. R. (2005). The influence of emotional intelligence on performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 693–703.
  • Meier, L. L., & Semmer, N. K. (2012). Lack of reciprocity and strain: Narcissism as a moderator of the association between feeling under-benefited and irritation. Work & Stress, 26(1), 56–67.
  • Meisler, G. (2013). Empirical exploration of the relationship between emotional intelligence, perceived organizational justice and turnover intentions. Employee Relations, 35(4), 441–455
  • Organ, D. (2016). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In B. Shaw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (1st ed., pp.43–72). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Richards, J., & Daley, H. (2003). Bullying policy: Development, implementation, and monitoring. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and Emotional abuse in the workplace: International Perspectives in research and Practice (pp. 247–258). London and New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Sprung, J. M., & Jex, S. M. (2012). Work locus of control as a moderator of the relationship between work stressors and counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Stress Management, 19(4), 272–291.
  • Tsaousis, I., & Nikolaou, I. (2002). Emotional intelligence in the workplace: Exploring its effects on occupational stress and organisational commitment. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 10(4), 327–342.
  • Winkel, D. E., Wyland, R. L., Shaffer, M. A., & Clason, P. (2011). A new perspective on psychological resources: Unanticipated consequences of impulsivity and emotional intelligence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 78–94.

Abstract Views: 381

PDF Views: 0




  • Moderating Influence of Emotional Intelligence on Organisational Citizenship Behaviour and Counterproductive Work Behaviour

Abstract Views: 381  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Oshin Dixit
Masters Organisational Psychology
Seema Singh
Amity Institute of Psychology & Allied Sciences, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


Emotions play a significant role in the organisational setting. It helps in building the social relationships which fosters the commitment of the employees towards the organisation which in turn affect the productivity of the organisation. The purpose of the present study was to understand the influence the emotional intelligence on organisational citizenship behaviour and counterproductive work behaviour. A total of 110 participants were taken. It was hypothesised that emotional intelligence would play a moderating role and would be positively correlated with organisational citizenship behaviour, and negatively correlated with counterproductive work behaviour. The results confirmed the moderating role of emotional intelligence on the influence of organisation citizenship behaviour with counterproductive work behaviour.

Keywords


Emotional Intelligence, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, Counterproductive Work Behaviour.

References