Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

QWL and Organization Efficiency: a Proposed Framework


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, SMS, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, India
2 SMS, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Quality of work Life (QWL) has evolved as an important aspect, which affects an organizational efficiency and productivity (Gorden, Judith R. 1987). The purpose of this paper is to understand and develop the concept of QWL in organization and to identify factors especially in the internal environment of an organization that leads to QWL. A qualitative approach is used to develop a conceptual model, depicting the difference in the total perceived level of QWL amongst employees and employers in organizations. SERVQUAL model is adapted in assess the QWL Level, in terms of its adequacy and superiority.

Keywords

Quality of Work Life, Servqual, Organizational Efficiency, Worker Satisfaction, Working Environment
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adreine E. Eaon, M. E. (1992). The impact of Quality of work Life Programs and greivances system effectiveness on union commitment. Industrial and labour relation review, Vol. 45, No.3.

  • Allen, W. A. (1976). Transit Services evaluation preliminary identification variables charactersterizing level of service. transportation tresearch Record, Vol. 606, pp.47-53.

  • Anuradha, S. A. (1995). Organizational Commitment and QWL: Perception of Indian Manager. Abhigyan, pp.39- 44.

  • Baba Vishwanath, V. J. (1991). Routinization of Job context and job content as related to employee's quality of work life: A Study of Canadian nurses. Journal of Organizational Behaviour,Vol. 12, pp.379-386.

  • Bar-Haim, A. (1984). "The desire for workers" Participation: Conflicting Forces inthe Work places. Relations industrielles, Vol. 39, No.2, pp.301-312.

  • Bruce., H. (1983). Quality of Work Life Studies: their implication for social and market researchers. European Research, pp.55-67.

  • Buekema, L. (1987). Quality of reduction of workingn hour. Groningen:Karstapel .

  • Catling, D. S. (1996). Increasing the attractiveness of light rail system. Public Transport International, No.4, pp.60-62.

  • Cooper, C. (1988). Humanizing the work places in Europe: An Overview of six countries. personal Journal, Vol. 59, pp.488-491.

  • D., M. (1982). Worker Productivity. Baverly Hill .

  • Dalia Akranaviciutus, J. R. (2007). Quality of work Life and its componetnt. measurment Engineering Economics, Vol. 2, No.52, pp.44-49.

  • Danna K., A. G. (1999). Health and well being in the workplace: A Review and synthesis of the litrature. Jouranal Of management, Vol. 25, No.3, pp.357-384.

  • Day, N. E. (1997). Staying in the closet versuscoming: Relationship between communication about sexual oreintation and work attitudes. Personnel Psychology, Vol. 50, pp.147-163.

  • Delamottee, Y. A. (1984). Quality of Working Life in International Perspective.

  • Don, R. (1981). quality of work Life movement Employee Relation . pp.2-6.

  • Donnelly, M. A. (1996, october). ‘ The portability and validity of the SERVQUAL scale in measuring the quality of local public service provision. Proceedings of the ICQ- 1996 International conference on Quality, pp.15-18.

  • Du Plessis, M. k. (1984). Monitering quality of Services from the passengers prespective. transportation research Record, Vol. 992, pp.28-31.

  • Dukerich, J. G. (2002). Beuty is in the eye of the beholder: the impact of organization identification, identify, and image on the cooperative behaviour of physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 47, pp.507-533.

  • E.M., G. (1976). Productivity Gains Through Work level Improvement.

  • Edmann, T. A. (2005). Unpacking commitment: multiple loyalities and employee behaviour. Journal of management studies, Vol. 42, No.2, pp. 301-328.

  • Elivesta, S. (2006). Relationship among Perception of Quality of Work Life and Job Satisfaction. Management and Organizational review, Vol. 2, No.3, pp.459-460.

  • F.W., T. (1947). Scientific Management. Harper and Brother.

  • Fuller, J. H. (2006). Perceived external prestige and internal respect:new insight into the organizational Identification process. Human Relations, Vol. 59, pp.815-846.

  • Gilgeous. (1998). The Quality of Work Life. Integrated Manufacturing System, Vol. 9, No.1, pp.173-181.

  • Glowsen, J. (1971). A Measure of Work Group Autonomy. Oslo: Tanum Press .

  • Goodman, P. (1980). Quality of Work life projects in 1980’spring meeting. Indusrial relation Research Assocciation, pp. 487-494.

  • Gorden, J. R. (1987). A Diognastic Approach to Organizational Behaviour. pp.651-663.

  • Greenhus, J. H. (1990). Effects of Race on organizational expreinces, job performance evaluation and career outcomes. Academy of management Journal, Vol. 33, No.1, pp.64-86.

  • Gunna Seelan Rethinam, M. I. (2008). A Basic Concept on QWL,. European Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 7, No.1, pp. 60.

  • Hackman, J. R. (1980). Work Redesign. Reading, M.A. . Addison-Wesley .

  • Hagerty, M. E. (2001). Quality of life Indexes for National Policy:Review and Agenda for Research. Social Indicator Research, Vol. 55, No.1.

  • Havlovic, S. (1991). Quality Of Work Life and Human Resource Outcomes. Industrial Relations, Vol. 30, No.3, pp.469-479.

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences. Beverly Hills. In: Suzanne, E. A., & Ad Kerkstra, J. V. (2001). Quality of working Life and Workload in Home Help Services: A review of the Literature and a proposal for a research Model. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Society, Vol. 15, pp.12-24.

  • J., A. E. (2001). Quality of Working Life and workload in home help services. pp.12-22.

  • Josnston, c. P. (1978). Quality of Working Life: The Idea and its Application:. Ottawa .

  • Kahn, R. (1981). Work and Health.

  • Kalra, S. A. (1984). Quality of Work life: A study of associated factors. The Indian Journal of Social Work, pp.45-54.

  • Kirkman, F. (1981). Who cares about job design? International journal of operations and Production Management, Vol. 2, pp.3-13.

  • Klandermans, P. J. (1989). Union Commitment Replication and Tests in the Dutch Context. Journal of applied psychology, Vol. 74, No.6, pp.869-875.

  • Knox, S. A. (1997). An interactive Quality of Work Life model applied to organizational behaviour transition. Journal of Nursing Administartion, Vol. 27, No.1, pp.39-47.

  • Kochan thomas A., H. C. (1984). Worker Participation and American Union: Threat or Opportunity . Kalamazoo Mich: W. E. Ujohn, pp.118-123.

  • L, C. P. (2000). Psychosocial Work Factors and Work Organization.

  • L.E., D. (1983). The Quality of working ife and the 1980s. New York: Praeger Publisher.

  • Lau, W. C. (2001). Inforamtion Technology and Work Environment- Doers it change the way People Interact at work. Human System Management, Vol. 20, No.3, pp.267- 280.

  • Lau. R.S. M. & Brue, E. M. (1998). A win win paradigm for quality of work life and business performance. Human Rsource envelopment Qualrterly, Vol. 9, No.3, pp.211- 226.

  • Lehto, A. M. (2004). Coorelate with the Definition of Quality of woork Life. Finnish Quality of work Life surveys .

  • Levine, M. F. (1983). Self developed QWL measures. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, Vol. 4, No.1, pp.35-46.

  • Lippitt, G. A. (1977). Living with work the search for quality in work life. Optimum, No.8, pp.34-43.

  • Lippitt, G. (1978). Quality of work life: Organizatiponal Renewal in action. Training & Development Journal,No. 7, pp.4-10.

  • Loscocco, K. A. (1991). Influences on the Quality of work and non work life: two Decades in review. J. Vocational Behaviour, Vol. 39, pp.182-225.

  • Maccoby, M. (1984). The Quality of work life in Bell System. Monthly labour Review, Vol. 10, No.3, pp.31-32.

  • Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and Personality. Harper; New York.

  • Mills, T. (1981). what is the working life? Ottawa .

  • Mirvis, P. A. (1984). Accounting for the quality of work. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, No. 5, pp.197-212.

  • Moodie, P. (1997, November). A fresh approach to customer care. Passenger rail management, No.19.

  • Nadler, D. A. (1983). Quality of Work Life; Prespectives and Direction. organizational Dynamics, Vol. 11, No.3, pp. 20- 30.

  • Olkonnen, M. A. (2006). Relationship Between Organizational Justice Identificationship with organization and work unit and group-related outcomes. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process, Vol. 100, pp.202-215.

  • P.R., L. j. (2009). perdictor f Quality of Work life of Sales Force in Derect Selling Organizations. ICFAI Journal of Managemnt Research, Vol. 8, No.6, pp.51-59.

  • Parasuraman, A. Z. (1985). A conceptual Model of Service Quality and its implication for future research. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64, No.1, pp.12-40.

  • Parasuraman, A. Z. (1991a). Refinement and reassesment of the SERVQUAL Scale. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 67, No.4, pp. 42-50.

  • Parasuraman, A. Z. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64, No.1, pp.12-40.

  • Parasuraman, A. Z. (1991b). Understanding customer expectation of services. Sloan management Review, pp.39-48.

  • Pranee, C. (2010). Correlate with Definition of QWL. The International Journal of Organizational Innovation, Vol. 2, No.3, pp.124-137.

  • Pullen, W. (1983). Definition and measurement of quality of services for local public transport management. Transport Review, Vol. 13, No.3, pp.247-264.

  • R.E., W. (1975). Criteria for Quality of working life. in L.E. Davis, A. B. Cherns and Associates (eds). The Quality of Working life: new York, No.1, pp.91-104.

  • Rathi, N. (2010). Theoatical basis for the QWLConcepts. Relationship of Quality of Work Life With Employee’s Psychological well Being, Vol. 3, No.1, pp.52-60.

  • Rebolloso, E. F.-R. (2001). Satisfaction de usuarious con un Servicio universidad, Elaboracion de un instrumento de evaluacion. Revista de Psicologia, Vol. 11, No.3, pp.27- 46.

  • Roslan Abdul Hakrim, R. I. (2010). The Impact of Social capital on Quality of Life: Evidence from Malasysia, Eoropian Journal of Economics,Finance and Administration Sciences. ISSN 1450-2887, No.22, pp.113-122.

  • Rouseeau, D. M. (1998). Why workerr still identify with organizations. journal of Organizational Behaviour, No. 19, pp.217-233.

  • S.P., R. (1998). Organizational Behaviour (8 ed.). New Jersey: Simon & Schuster.

  • Saklani, D. (2010). Non-managerial Prespective of Quality of work Life. Journal of management Research, No. 10, pp. 87-102.

  • Scanlan, B. R. (1976). Determinants of job Satisfaction and Productivity. Personnel Journal,No. 55, pp.12-14.

  • Scobel, D. N. (1975). Doing Away with the factory Blues. Harrvard Business Review, No. 53, pp.132-142.

  • Seashore, S. E. (1975). Defining andf measuring the Quality of Work life: In the Quality of work life problem and prospects and state of the Art, No. 1.

  • Serey T.T. (2006). Choosing Robust Quality Of Work Life. Busiess Forum, Vol. 27, No.2, pp.7-10.

  • Silock, D. T. (1981). Measure of Operational performance for urbanbus services. Traffic Engineering and Controll, Vol. 22, No.1, pp.645-8.

  • Sirgy, E. S. (2001). A New Measure of Quality of Work Life (QWL) based on Satisfaction and spillover theories. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 55, pp.241-302.

  • Sklani, D. (2004). An Basic Concepts of QWL. Journal of management research, Vol. 10, No.2.

  • Srivastava, S. P. (1975). An Evaluation of Policy Related Research and Productivity,Indusrial

  • Organization and job satisfaction:Policy Developmemnt and Implicatation. Case Western University.

  • Stacey, N. A. (1983). The Educational implications of QWL, in D. Skrovan (Ed.). Quality of work life, Reading, Mas: Addison-Wesley, pp.137-145.

  • Starkauskiene, V. P. (n.d.). Quality of Life concept, measurmnent and challenges. Taiko moji ekono mik A: Sisteminianityrimai .

  • Straw, R. &. (1984). QWL:New Working relationship in the Communication industry. Labour Studies Journal, No. 8, pp.261-274.

  • Sutela, H. (2006). Correlate with the Definition of QWL. Statistical journal of the United nations, No. 23, pp.57- 67.

  • Suttle, J. (1977). improving Life at work:Problem and Prospects. behavioral Science approaches to organzeatinal Changes, pp.1-29.

  • T, N. W. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of Personality Attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer Nomination Personality Rating. journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, No.66, pp.574-583.

  • W, R. P. (1998). Belastng and beanspruchurg Heidelberg, Asanger.

  • Walton, R. E. (1974). QWL indicators: Prospects and problems’, In a Portigal (ed.), Measuring the quality of working life. pp.57-70.

  • Walton, R. (1973). Qualiity work life: What is It? Vol. 11, pp.11-21.

  • Warr, P. C. (1979). Scales for the measurment of some work attitude and aspects of psychological well being . Journal Of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 52, pp.129-148.

  • Wyatt, T. A. (1988). Quality of Working Life: Cross Culture Considerations. Asia pacific journal of Management, Vol. 6, No.1, pp.129-140.


Abstract Views: 464

PDF Views: 6




  • QWL and Organization Efficiency: a Proposed Framework

Abstract Views: 464  |  PDF Views: 6

Authors

Tripti Singh
Assistant Professor, SMS, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, India
Sumit Kumar Srivastav
SMS, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, India

Abstract


Quality of work Life (QWL) has evolved as an important aspect, which affects an organizational efficiency and productivity (Gorden, Judith R. 1987). The purpose of this paper is to understand and develop the concept of QWL in organization and to identify factors especially in the internal environment of an organization that leads to QWL. A qualitative approach is used to develop a conceptual model, depicting the difference in the total perceived level of QWL amongst employees and employers in organizations. SERVQUAL model is adapted in assess the QWL Level, in terms of its adequacy and superiority.

Keywords


Quality of Work Life, Servqual, Organizational Efficiency, Worker Satisfaction, Working Environment

References