Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Recruitment and Selection Techniques in Manufacturing and Service Organizations Operating in India


Affiliations
1 Professor, Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar-125001, Haryana, India
2 Research Scholar, Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar-125001, Haryana, India
3 Professor, Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar-125001, Haryana, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Primary data based on 426 respondents were analyzed to compare the recruitment and selection techniques being practiced by Manufacturing and Service organizations operating in India. For the analysis of the data, statistical tools such as latent trait model, percentages, means and standard deviations were used. This study explored that recruitment and selection practices vary across industrial sector in India. Service companies use recruitment methods more vigorously in comparison to Manufacturing companies. The most practiced recruitment methods in Manufacturing companies are direct applicants, placement consultants, employee referrals and company websites. At the same time, recruitment methods adopted by Service companies are employee referrals, job portals, temporary staffing, head hunting, advertisement in newspapers and company websites. When it comes to selection, methods found to be applied in Manufacturing companies are written tests and general interview. In case of Service companies, the methods are written tests and tests on specific skills. Implications and limitations of the study were also discussed.

Keywords

Recruitment, Selection, HRM, India, Manufacturing Companies, Service Companies, Latent Trait Model
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anderson, N. & Witvliet, C. (2008). Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Methods: An International Comparison between The Netherlands, The United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and Singapore. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(1), pp. 1-13.

  • Anderson, N. (2003). Applicant and Recruiter Reactions to New Technology in Selection: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11 (2/3), pp. 121-36.

  • Arthur, D. (2008). Recruiting, Interviewing, Selecting & Orienting New Employees, (6th ed.). New Delhi: PHI Learning.

  • Bartholomew, D. J., Steele, F., Moustaki, I., & Galbraith J. I. (2008). Analysis of Multivariate Social Science Data, (2nd ed.). Chapmen & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.

  • Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P., Mills, D. & Walton, R. E. (1984). Managing Human Assets, New York: Free Press.

  • Branine, M. (2008). Graduate Recruitment and Selection in the UK: A Study of the Recent Changes in Methods and Expectations. Career Development International, 13(6), pp. 497-513.

  • Breaugh, J. A. (1981). Relationships between Recruiting Sources and Employee Tenure, Absenteeism and Work Attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), pp. 142-57.

  • Budhwar, P. S. & Boyne, G. (2004),. Human Resource Management in the India Public and Private Sectors: An Empirical Comparison. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, pp. 346-70.

  • Dineen, B. R. & Soltis, S. M. (2011). Recruitment: A Review of Research and Emerging Directions, In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, (pp.43-66). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Fein, R. (1998). Traditional or Recruitment Tools: How Do People Get Hired. Journal of Career Planning and Development, 58, pp. 40-43.

  • Guion, R. M. (1992). Personnel Assessment, Selection and Placement, In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, (pp.327-97), Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  • Holtbrügge, D., Friedmann, C. B. & Puck J. F. (2010). Recruitment and Retention in Foreign Firms in India: A Resource Based View. Human Resource Management, 49(3), pp. 439-55.

  • Hsu, Y. R. & Leat, M. (2000). A Study of HRM and Recruitment and Selection Policies and Practices in Taiwan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(2), pp. 413-35.

  • Jusoh, M. & Kok Ai, C. (2002). Hiring Managers in the Manufacturing Industry of Malaysia. Journal of Transnational Management Development, 6(3/4), pp. 21-38.

  • Khandekar, A. & Sharma, A. (2005). Organizational Learning in Indian Organizations: A Strategic HRM Perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(2), pp. 211-26.

  • Konig, C. J., Klehe, U., Berchtold, M. & Kleinmann, M. (2010). Reasons for Being Selective When Choosing Personnel Selection Procedures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(1), pp. 17-27.

  • Manpower Inc. (2006). Confirming the Coming Talent Crunch: What’s Next?, Retrieved July 19, 2012 from http://www.manpower.com/ mpcom files?name:=Results_Talent Shortage_2006.pdf

  • Michaels, E., Handfiled, J. H. & Axelrod, B. (2001), The War for Talent. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Montgomery, C. (1996). Organization Fit is Key to Job Success. HR Magazine, 41(1), pp. 94-7.

  • Moustaki, I. (1996). A Latent Trait and a Latent Class Model for Mixed Observed Variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49(2), pp. 313-34.

  • Parry, E. & Tyson, S. (2008). An Analysis of the Use and Success of Online Recruitment Methods in the UK. Human Resource Management Journal, 18(3), pp. 257-74.

  • Pio, E. (2007). HRM and Indian Epistemologies: A Review and Avenues for Future Research. Human Resource Management Review, 17, pp. 319-35.

  • Piotrowski, C. & Armstrong, T. (2006). Current Recruitment and Selection Practices: A National Survey of Fortune 1000 Firms. North American Journal of Psychology, 8(3), pp. 489-96.

  • Ployhart, R. E. (2006). Staffing in the 21st Century: New Challenges and Strategic Opportunities. Journal of Management, 32, pp. 868-97.

  • Rao, P. (2010). A Resource-Based Analysis of Recruitment and Selection Practices of Indian Software Companies, A Case Study Approach. Journal of Indian Business Research, 2(1), pp. 32-51.

  • Ryan, A. M. & Tippins, N. T. (2004). Attracting and Selecting: What Psychological Research Tells Us. Human Resource Management, 43, pp. 305-18.

  • Ryan, A. M., McFarland, L., Baron, H. & Page, R. (1999). An International Look at Selection Practices: Nation and Culture as Explanations for Variability in Practice. Personnel Psychology, 52, pp. 359-91.

  • Sackett, P. R. & Lievens, F. (2008). Personnel Selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, pp. 419-50.

  • Scholarios, D. & Lockyer, C. (1999). Recruiting and Selecting Professionals: Context, Qualities, and Methods. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(3), pp. 142-57.

  • Scott, M., Roberts, I., Holroyd, G. & Sawbridge, D. (1989). Management and Industrial Relations in Small Firms, Department of Employment. Research Paper No. 70. London.

  • Taylor, S. (1994). The Relationship between Sources of New Employees and Attitude towards the Job. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(1), pp. 99-111.

  • Ullman, J. C. (1966). Employee Referrals: Prime Tool for Recruiting Workers. Personnel, 43, pp. 30-35.

  • Wickramasinghe, V. (2007). Staffing Practices in the Private Sector in Sri Lanka. Career Development International, 12(2), pp. 108-28.

  • Wilk, S. L. & Cappelli, P. (2003). Understanding the Determinants of Employer Use of Selection Methods. Personnel Psychology, 56, pp. 103-24.


Abstract Views: 1038

PDF Views: 2




  • Recruitment and Selection Techniques in Manufacturing and Service Organizations Operating in India

Abstract Views: 1038  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Subhash C Kundu
Professor, Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar-125001, Haryana, India
Desh Rattan
Research Scholar, Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar-125001, Haryana, India
Ved Pal Sheera
Professor, Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar-125001, Haryana, India
Neha Gahlawat
Research Scholar, Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar-125001, Haryana, India

Abstract


Primary data based on 426 respondents were analyzed to compare the recruitment and selection techniques being practiced by Manufacturing and Service organizations operating in India. For the analysis of the data, statistical tools such as latent trait model, percentages, means and standard deviations were used. This study explored that recruitment and selection practices vary across industrial sector in India. Service companies use recruitment methods more vigorously in comparison to Manufacturing companies. The most practiced recruitment methods in Manufacturing companies are direct applicants, placement consultants, employee referrals and company websites. At the same time, recruitment methods adopted by Service companies are employee referrals, job portals, temporary staffing, head hunting, advertisement in newspapers and company websites. When it comes to selection, methods found to be applied in Manufacturing companies are written tests and general interview. In case of Service companies, the methods are written tests and tests on specific skills. Implications and limitations of the study were also discussed.

Keywords


Recruitment, Selection, HRM, India, Manufacturing Companies, Service Companies, Latent Trait Model

References