Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Relation between Probability of Success and Competency Level


Affiliations
1 Directorate of Commercial Taxes, Government of West Bengal, Kolkata, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of this paper is to derive a mathematical relationship between the probability of success and competency level of any individual in an activity. A deductive approach has been employed here to derive the mathematical relation. The probability of success has been found to be an exponential function of the competency level. The work of this paper would be the threshold for further research in constructing a valid and reliable scale of measurement for competency level in every activity. The individuals, by means of this relation, could prepare themselves in better a way to participate in any event and the HR professionals could more effectively modulate training programmes. In addition to this, the employers, instead of using the elimination process, may also use the relation for selecting appropriate human resources for the posts of their organisations. This paper is the first in its category to derive the mathematical relationship between probability of success and competency level.

Keywords

Probability of Success, Performance, Activity, Competency Level, Human Resources, Training
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Baron, R. A. (1998). Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Boam, R. & Sparrow, P. (1992). Designing and Achieving Competency. London: McGraw-Hill.

  • Bowden, J. A. & Masters, G. N. (1993). Implications for Higher Education of a Competency-Based Approach to Education and Training, Department of Employment, Education and Training. Canberra.

  • Boyatzis, R. (1982). Competency Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. New York: Willey.

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (2008). Competencies in the 21st Century. Journal of Management Development, 27(1), pp. 5-12.

  • Cramer, H. (1966). The Elements of Probability Theory and Some of Its Applications. New York: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co.

  • Dreyfus, S. E. & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition, (Unpublished report supported by the Air Force Office of scientific Research, Contract #F49620-79-C-0063). Berkeley: University of California.

  • Elliott, S. (2008). The Effect of Teachers’ Attitude toward Inclusion on the Practice and Success Levels of Children With and Without Disabilities in Physical Education. International Journal of Special Education, 23(3), pp. 48-55.

  • Feldman, R. S. (1996). Understanding Psychology. New York: McGraw Hill.

  • Hager, P., Gonczi, A. & Athanasou, J. (1994). General Issues about Assessment of Competence. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 19(1), pp. 3-16.

  • Hoffmann, T. (1999). The Meaning of Competency. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(6), pp. 275-285.

  • Lawler, E. E. III (1994). From Job-Based to Competency Based Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 15(1), pp. 3-15.

  • Linder, J. R. (2001). Competency Assessment and Human Resource Management Performance of County Extension Chairs. Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Research, 51(1), pp. 333-346.

  • Makus, H. L., Cooper, T. H. D. & Allpress, K. N. (2005). Confounded by Competencies? An Evaluation and Use of Competency Models. New Zeeland Journal of Psychology, 34(2), pp. 117-126.

  • Markus, L. H., Thomas, H. D. & Allpress, K. N. (2005). Confounded by Competencies? An Evaluation of the Evolution and Use of Competency Models. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34( 2), pp. 117-126.

  • McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for Competence Rather Than for Intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1), pp. 1-14.

  • Nikolaou, I. (2003). The Development and Validation of a Measure of Generic Work Competencies. International Journal of Testing, 3(4), pp. 309-319.

  • Panne, G., Beers, C. & Kleinknecht, A. (2003). Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), pp. 1-30.

  • Parry, S. B. (1996). The Quest for Competencies, Training Magazine, pp. 48-56.

  • Przuli, Z. & Draskovic, S. (2012). Myths, Culture and Success in Business: A Case of US and Serbian Cultures. African Journal of Business Management, 6(3), pp. 7024-7030.

  • Rutherford, P. (1995). Competency Based Assessment. Melbourne: Pitman.

  • Smith, D. J. (2005). Reliability and Maintainability and Risk, 7th (Ed.). Elsevier.

  • Sternberg, R. & Kolligian, J. (1990). Competence Considered. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Wigfield, A. (1988). Children’s Attributions for Success and Failure: Effects of Age Attentional Focus. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), pp. 76-81.


Abstract Views: 445

PDF Views: 2




  • The Relation between Probability of Success and Competency Level

Abstract Views: 445  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Ratan Ch Chakraborty
Directorate of Commercial Taxes, Government of West Bengal, Kolkata, India

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to derive a mathematical relationship between the probability of success and competency level of any individual in an activity. A deductive approach has been employed here to derive the mathematical relation. The probability of success has been found to be an exponential function of the competency level. The work of this paper would be the threshold for further research in constructing a valid and reliable scale of measurement for competency level in every activity. The individuals, by means of this relation, could prepare themselves in better a way to participate in any event and the HR professionals could more effectively modulate training programmes. In addition to this, the employers, instead of using the elimination process, may also use the relation for selecting appropriate human resources for the posts of their organisations. This paper is the first in its category to derive the mathematical relationship between probability of success and competency level.

Keywords


Probability of Success, Performance, Activity, Competency Level, Human Resources, Training

References