Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparison of Nurse Teachers and General Teachers and Nurses Happy Planet Index


Affiliations
1 Department of Nursing, Youngnam Foreign Language College, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
2 Department of Dental Hygiene, Pohang University, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
3 Department of Dental Hygiene, Youngnam Foreign Language College, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Background/Objectives: He purpose of this study is to suggest alternatives for being happier by measuring teachers and nurses’ happy planet index among women who enter professions and by grasping factors that have impacts on clinical nurses’ happiness.

Method/Statistical Analysis: This study conducted a survey of a total of 727 teachers and looked into surveys that have 19 questions on the happy planet index and 7 questions on general characteristics. SPSS WIN 23.0 was used as the data analysis method and multivariate analysis of variance(MANOVA) was used to analyze differences in the happy planet index among groups and multiple regression analysis was used to analyze factors that had impacts on the happy planet index.

Findings: The results of this study showed that correlation among the happy planet index and the housing possession and monthly income and working experience was statistically significant and that factors that had impacts on the happy planet index were age and marriage and religion and educational background.

Improvements/Applications: As for the study results, it is reckoned that potential developments and motivation programs that improve self-respect and self-consciousness and that can contribute to organizations should be developed for improvements in the happy planet index of clinical nurses who have very little work experience.


Keywords

Nurse, Happy Planet Index, Nurse Teachers, General Teachers, Psychological Well-being.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


Abstract Views: 294

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparison of Nurse Teachers and General Teachers and Nurses Happy Planet Index

Abstract Views: 294  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Oe-Nam Kim
Department of Nursing, Youngnam Foreign Language College, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Na-Rae Oh
Department of Dental Hygiene, Pohang University, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Su-Yeon Seo
Department of Dental Hygiene, Youngnam Foreign Language College, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of

Abstract


Background/Objectives: He purpose of this study is to suggest alternatives for being happier by measuring teachers and nurses’ happy planet index among women who enter professions and by grasping factors that have impacts on clinical nurses’ happiness.

Method/Statistical Analysis: This study conducted a survey of a total of 727 teachers and looked into surveys that have 19 questions on the happy planet index and 7 questions on general characteristics. SPSS WIN 23.0 was used as the data analysis method and multivariate analysis of variance(MANOVA) was used to analyze differences in the happy planet index among groups and multiple regression analysis was used to analyze factors that had impacts on the happy planet index.

Findings: The results of this study showed that correlation among the happy planet index and the housing possession and monthly income and working experience was statistically significant and that factors that had impacts on the happy planet index were age and marriage and religion and educational background.

Improvements/Applications: As for the study results, it is reckoned that potential developments and motivation programs that improve self-respect and self-consciousness and that can contribute to organizations should be developed for improvements in the happy planet index of clinical nurses who have very little work experience.


Keywords


Nurse, Happy Planet Index, Nurse Teachers, General Teachers, Psychological Well-being.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.37506/v20%2Fi1%2F2020%2Fmlu%2F194607