Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Visual Proof: Identifying a Pattern in Photographic Coverage of a Social Movement


Affiliations
1 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, 615 McCallie Avenue Department 3003, Chattanooga TN, 37403, United States
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study compared the photographic news coverage of the Occupy Wall Street protests from two competing New York City tabloid newspapers on opposite sides of the political spectrum, the New York Post (conservative) and the Daily News (liberal). The purpose of the study was to determine if there were any differences in the photographic coverage of the Occupy Wall Street protests between the two media outlets. A content analysis was conducted to detect and confirm any statistically significant differences in photographic coverage. Results showed that the differences in photographic coverage were significantly different suggesting that each media outlet may have presented the photographs to express a specific opinion of the protests. The study also determined that social proof is a useful theory for detecting a pattern of selection in photographic coverage of a social movement.

Keywords

Social Proof, Media Bias, Social Movement
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


Abstract Views: 354

PDF Views: 0




  • Visual Proof: Identifying a Pattern in Photographic Coverage of a Social Movement

Abstract Views: 354  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Michael B. Friedman
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, 615 McCallie Avenue Department 3003, Chattanooga TN, 37403, United States

Abstract


This study compared the photographic news coverage of the Occupy Wall Street protests from two competing New York City tabloid newspapers on opposite sides of the political spectrum, the New York Post (conservative) and the Daily News (liberal). The purpose of the study was to determine if there were any differences in the photographic coverage of the Occupy Wall Street protests between the two media outlets. A content analysis was conducted to detect and confirm any statistically significant differences in photographic coverage. Results showed that the differences in photographic coverage were significantly different suggesting that each media outlet may have presented the photographs to express a specific opinion of the protests. The study also determined that social proof is a useful theory for detecting a pattern of selection in photographic coverage of a social movement.

Keywords


Social Proof, Media Bias, Social Movement



DOI: https://doi.org/10.15655/mw%2F2014%2Fv5i1%2F53585