OPUS: HR Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Effect of Organizational Politics on Employee Engagement


Affiliations
1 Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
2 Assistant Professor, School of Commerce, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Assessing organizational politics’ effect on employee engagement in Ethiopian Ministry of Revenues was the aim of this study. To this end, a quantitative research approach with explanatory research design was employed. Questionnaire was developed and used for data collection purpose. Descriptive and inferential analysis was also conducted. The results of the study reveal a negative and moderate association of organizational politics and employee engagement. It was observed that 47.4% variance in employees’ engagement was caused by organizational politics. Accordingly, to minimize adverse impact organizational politics has on employee engagement level introducing as well as taking measures that reduce individual’s political behaviors by making procedures and standards in a clear way and with effective communication channels should be in place. It is also recommended that the managers of Ministry of Revenues should introduce policies and strategies that enhance the engagement level of employees related to implementing competitive and attractive compensation package, giving appropriate recognition and rewards for excellent performers, establishing open communication, healthiest employee relation, and participatory management.

Keywords

Employee Engagement, General Political Behavior, Organizational Politics, Going Along to Get Ahead, Pay and Promotion Policy
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252-276.

  • Amarja, S. N. (2013). The inevitable ‘organizational politics. International Journal of Marketing and Human Resource Management (IJMHRM), 4(1), 14-20.

  • Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 274-284.

  • Best, J. W., & Khan, J. V. (1995). Research in education (7th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall Press Board.

  • Blau, P. (1964). Power and exchange in social life. New York: Wiley.

  • Blessing White. (2008). The state of employee engagement.

  • Brandon, R., & Seldman, M. (2004). Survival of the savvy: High integrity political tactics for career and company success. New York: Free Press.

  • Buchanan, D. A. (2008). You stab my back, I’ll stab yours: Management experience and perceptions of organization political behavior. British Journal of Management, 19, 49-64.

  • Catherine, N. M. (2009). Factors that contribute to the level of employee engagement in the telecommunication industry in Kenya: A case study of Zain Kenya (Unpublished MA thesis, University of Nairobi).

  • Coffman, C. (2000). Is your company bleeding talent? How to become a true “employer of choice”. The Gallup Management Journal, 2000. Princeton, NJ: The Gallup Organization.

  • Coffman, C., & Gonzalez-Molina, G. (2002). Follow this path: How the world’s greatest organizations drive growth by unleashing human potential. New York: Warner Books, Inc.

  • Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2009). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate & postgraduate students. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 159-180.

  • Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A., & Chen, P. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice.

  • Group and Organizational Management, 27, 324-335.

  • Cropanzano, R. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Bozeman, D. P. (1995). The social setting of work organizations: Politics, justice, and support. In R. S. Cropanzano & K. M. Kacmar (Eds.), Organizational Politics, Justice, and Support: Managing the Social Climate of the Workplace. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

  • Drory, A., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2010). Organizational politics and human resource management: A typology and the Israeli experience, Human Resource Management Review, 20, 194-202.

  • Drory, A. (1993). Perceived political climate and job attitudes. Organization Studies, 14(1), 59-71.

  • Dulebohn, J. H., & Martocchio, J. J. (1998). Employee perceptions of the fairness of work group incentive pay plan. Journal of Management, 24(4), 469-488.

  • Ellis, C. M., & Sorensen, A. (2007). Assessing employee engagement: The key to improving productivity. Perspectives, 15(1), Issue 1 The Segal Group, Inc.

  • Fabian, O. U., & Ike, E. O. (2013). Exploring the relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and work engagement: An investigation in the Nigerian University context. Proceedings of INTED 2013 Conference, 4th-6th March 2013, Valencia, Spain

  • Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management, 18, 93-116. Gallup. (2004). International manufacturing firm: Employee engagement. Princeton: Gallup.

  • Gemma, R. S., & Carl, M. (2009). Employee engagement a review of current thinking. Institute for Employment Studies.

  • Geoffrey, M., David, D., & David, F. (2005). Essentials of research design and methodology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon

  • Gotsis, G. N., & Kortezi, Z. (2010). Ethical considerations in organizational politics: Expanding the perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 497-517.

  • Hakanen, J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 495-513.

  • Hallberg, U. E., Johansson, G., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). Type a behavior and work situation: Association with burnout and work engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 48(25), 135-142.

  • Hartel, C. E. J., & Berry, M. E. (1999). In search of a unified definition of organizational political behavior: Evidence for a multi-level approach. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management.

  • Heintzman, R., & Marson, B. (2006). People, service and trust: Links in the public sector service value chain. Retrieved from http://www. hrma-agrh.gc.ca/veo-bve/index_e.asp

  • Hewitt Associates. (2005). Employee engagement. Retrieved May 2, 2021, from http://was4.hewitt.com/hewitt/services/talent/subtalent/ ee_engagement.htm

  • Hewitt Associates. (2004, May). Hewitt Associates study shows more engaged employees drive improved business performance and return. Press Release.

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Hochwarter, W. A., Witt, L. A., & Kacmar, K. M. (2000). Perceptions of organizational politics as a moderator of the relationship between conscientiousness and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 472-478.

  • Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2008). Educational administration: Theory research and practice. Publication: McGraw-Hill Companies.

  • Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530-557.

  • Kacmar, K. M., & Dawn, C. S. (1997). Further validation of the perceptions of politics scale (POPS): A multiple sample investigation, Journal of Management, 23(5), 627-658.

  • Kacmar, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (1991). Perceptions of organizational politics scale (POPS): development and construct validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(1), 193-205

  • Kacmar, K. M., & Baron, R. A. (1999). Organizational politics: The state of the field links to related processes and an agenda for future research. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (pp. 1-39). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.

  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  • Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontic, 38(1), 52-54.

  • Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology, methods & techniques.

  • Koyuncu, M., Burke, R. J., & Fiksenbaum, L. (2006). Work engagement among women managers and professionals in a Turkish bank: Potential antecedents and consequences. Equal Opportunities International, 25, 299-310.

  • Ladebo, O. J. (2006). Perceptions of organizational politics: Examination of a situational antecedent and consequences among Nigeria’s extension personnel. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55(2), 255-281.

  • Latif, A. et al. (2011). Individual political behavior in organizational relationship. Journal of Politics and Law, 4(1), 199-210.

  • Levinson, E. (2007b). Authentic CSR creates higher employee engagement. Retrieved from www.interactionassociates.com/ideas/2007/08/ authentic_csr_creates_higher_employee_engagement_.php

  • Locke, E. A., & Lathan, G. P. (1976). Theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Lockwood, N. R. (2007). Leveraging employee engagement for competitive advantage: HR’s strategic role. Society for Human Resource Management Quarterly.

  • Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3-30.

  • Marczyk, G., Dematteo, D., & Festinger, D. (2005). Essentials of research design and methodology. Hoboken, New Jersey and Canada: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

  • Markwich, C., & Robertson, S. G. (2009). Employee engagement. A review of current thinking. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.

  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37.

  • Mayers, R. H. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications. PWS-Kent Publishing Company.

  • Melcrum. (2007). The practitioner’s Guide to: Essential techniques for employee engagement. Melcrum Publishing Limited.

  • Menar, S. (2011). An introduction to logistic regression diagnostics (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.

  • Miller, B. K., Rutherford, M. A., & Kolodinsky, R. W. (2008). Perceptions of organizational politics: A meta-analysis of outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(3), 209-222.

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Olorunleke, G. K. (2015). Effect of organizational politics on organizational goals and objectives. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Science, 4(3), 59-70.

  • Othman, R. (2008). Organizational politics: The role of justice, trust and job ambiguity. Singapore Management Review, 30(1), 43-53.

  • Ott, B., Blacksmith, N., & Royal, K. (2007). Job seekers ask: Who’s the boss? The Gallup Management Journal.

  • Perrin, T. (2007). Largest ever study of global workforce finds senior management holds trigger to unleash talent potential. Towers Perrin HR Services.

  • Poon, J. (2003). Situational antecedents and outcomes of organizational politics and perceptions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(2), 138-155.

  • Robbins, S. P., Millett, B., Cacioppe, R., & Waters-Marsh, T. (1998). Organizational behavior: Leading and managing in Australia and New Zealand. French’s Forest, NSW, Australia: Prentice Hall.

  • Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S. (2004). The drivers of employee engagement, Institute for Employment Studies.

  • Roffey Park Institute. (2008). http://www.roffeypark.com/ SiteCollectionDocuments/engagement%20diagnostic%2

  • Rothbard, N. P., & Patil, S. V. (2011). Being there: Work engagement and positive organizational scholarship. In K. S. Cameron & G. M.

  • Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (pp. 56-69). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(6), 600-619

  • Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiro´, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217-1227.

  • Samuel, Y. (2018). The political agenda of organizations. Routledge, New York, U.S.A.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two simple confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.

  • Senaviratna, N. A., & Cooray, T. M. (2019). Diagnosing multicollinearity of logistic regression model, Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 5(2), 1-9.

  • Thompson, J. (2007). Training supervisors to be leaders: A missing element in efforts to improve federal performance. Retrieved from www.govexec.com/pdfs/ALI_thompsonreport.pdf

  • Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Drory, A. (2006). Handbook of organizational politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Kapun, D. (2005). Perceptions of politics and perceived performance in public and private organizations: A test of one model across two sectors. Policy & Politics, 33(2), 251-276.

  • Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Leadership style, organizational politics, and employees’ performance: An empirical examination of two competing models. Personnel Review, 36(5), 661-683.

  • Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Talmud, I. (2010). Organizational politics and job outcomes: the moderating effect of trust and social support. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(11), 2829-2861.

  • Vince, R. (2001). Power and emotion in organizational learning. Human Relations, 54(10), 1325-1351.

  • Vredenburgh, D., & Shea-VanFossen, R. (2010). Human nature, organizational politics and human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 9(1), 26-47.

  • Wellins, R. S., Bernthal, P., & Phelps, M. (2005). Employee engagement: The key to realize competitive advantage. Retrieved May 8, 2021, from http://www.ddiworld.com/ddi/media/monographs/employeeengagement_mg_ddi.pdf?ext=.pdf

  • Witt, L. A., Andrews, M. C., & Kacmar, K. M. (2000). The role of participation in decision-making in the organizational politics-job satisfaction relationship. Human Relations, 53(3), 341-358.

  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 121-141.

  • Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics, an introductory analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row


Abstract Views: 440

PDF Views: 0




  • The Effect of Organizational Politics on Employee Engagement

Abstract Views: 440  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Solomon Getaneh Mersha
Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
Abdurezak Mohammed Kuhil
Assistant Professor, School of Commerce, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

Abstract


Assessing organizational politics’ effect on employee engagement in Ethiopian Ministry of Revenues was the aim of this study. To this end, a quantitative research approach with explanatory research design was employed. Questionnaire was developed and used for data collection purpose. Descriptive and inferential analysis was also conducted. The results of the study reveal a negative and moderate association of organizational politics and employee engagement. It was observed that 47.4% variance in employees’ engagement was caused by organizational politics. Accordingly, to minimize adverse impact organizational politics has on employee engagement level introducing as well as taking measures that reduce individual’s political behaviors by making procedures and standards in a clear way and with effective communication channels should be in place. It is also recommended that the managers of Ministry of Revenues should introduce policies and strategies that enhance the engagement level of employees related to implementing competitive and attractive compensation package, giving appropriate recognition and rewards for excellent performers, establishing open communication, healthiest employee relation, and participatory management.

Keywords


Employee Engagement, General Political Behavior, Organizational Politics, Going Along to Get Ahead, Pay and Promotion Policy

References