South Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Definitions of Project Success in Implementation of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Information Technology (IT) Solutions: Perspectives of Consultants from India


Affiliations
1 Training and Assessment, Infosys Limited, Opposite ISB, IIIT-Wipro Road, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad-500032, India
2 Hyderabad Business School, GITAM University, Hyderabad Campus Rudraram, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy Dist., Telangana 502329, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Organizations implementing technology face two options: either to build a solution from scratch or buy a packaged solution available. While the latter is more popular option, it is not easy. It needs the help from Information Technology (IT) consultants, who would be integrating the existing IT landscape to the new solution. Implementation of IT solutions in the critical area of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) is a time consuming, costly and complex affair. While the IT consultants would drive this process, the inherent risk of failure remains, and their perception of success in this area is therefore critical.The risks of failure are high in projects and even higher in technology projects. The success factor lies in an infinite space and reasons for failures could be many. Since the role played by the IT consultants are critical, their perspective of looking at success is important, which has been an untouched area in IT/project management literature. This research note summarizes the major dimensions and outcomes of a study carried out on 105 project managers of CRM IT projects in India. The IT firms they worked for were globally established (in excess of 100,000 employees) and had an average of US$5 bn in revenues. Findings reveal that there has been a sea change in the perception of success, with customer and team satisfaction being accorded a high priority. Respondents also acknowledged the need for an enlarged project scope and the role played by a motivated team in the success of a project.

Keywords

Customer Relationship Management (CRM), India, Information Technology (IT), Project Success.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ang, L., & Buttle, F. A. (2002). ROI on CRM: a customer-journey approach. In Conference Proceedings of the IMP (Industrial Marketing and Purchasing) Conference, Perth, Australia, December. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337-342.

  • Baccarini, D. (1999). The logical framework method for dening project success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25-32.

  • Baker, B. N., Fisher, D., & Murphy, D. C. (1988). Project management in the public sector: Success and failure patterns compared to private sector projects. In D. I. Cleland & W. R. King (Eds.), Project management handbook (pp. 920-934). New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

  • Campbell, K., & Roberts, K. (2007). What is this thing called CRM? University Business, 10(10), 79-82.

  • CIO. (2016). The truth about on-demand CRM. Retrieved from http://www.cio.com

  • Chalmeta, R. (2006). Methodology for customer relationship management. The Journal of Systems and Software, 79, 1015-1024.

  • Chen, I. J., & Popovich, K. (2003). Understanding customer relationship management (CRM) People, process and technology. Business Process Management Journal, 9(5), 672-688.

  • Cooke-Davies, T. J. (2002). The real success factors in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 185-190.

  • CRM Guru. (2016). On-demand CRM versus on premise CRM. Retrieved from http://www.crm-guru.com

  • CRM Integrator. (2016). SaaS on Premise CRM. Retrieved from http:// www.crmintegrator.com

  • CRM Search. (2016). SaaS versus on premise. Retrieved from http:// www.crmsearch.com

  • Data 2 CRM. (2016). On-demand CRM versus on premise CRM. Retrieved from https://www.data2crm.com

  • Didraga, O. (2013). The role and the effects of risk Management in IT projects success. Informatica Economica, 17(1), 86-98

  • Dvir, D., Raz, T., & Shenhar, A. J. (2003). An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 89-95.

  • Forsyth, R. (2001). Six Major Impediments to Change and How to Overcome them in CRM, CRM-Forum (June 11, 2001).

  • Forza, C. (2002). Survey research in operations management: a process-based perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 152-194.

  • Foss, B., Stone, M., & Ekinci, Y. (2008). What makes for CRM system success — or failure? Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 15(2), 68-78. doi:10.1057/dbm.2008.5

  • Freeman, M., & Beale, P. (1992). Measuring project success. Project Management Institute.

  • Goodhue, D. L., Wixom, B. H.,& Watson, H. J. (2002). Realizing business benefits through CRM: Hitting the right target in the right way. MIS Quarterly Executive, 1(2), pp. 79-94.

  • Hart, M. L. (2006). Customer relationship management: Are software applications aligned with business objectives? South African Journal of Business Management, 37(2), 17-32.

  • Kale, S. H. (2004). CRM Failure and the Seven Deadly Sins. Marketing Management, 13(5), 42-46.

  • Klie, L. (2012). CRM Is a High-Yield Investment. CRM Magazine, 16(2), 13-14.

  • Lim, C. S., & Mohamed, M. Z. (1999). Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 243-248.

  • Limbaan, A., & Rusu, L. (2011). Implementing SaaS Solution for CRM. Informatica Economica, 15(2), 175-183.

  • Mukerjee, H. S., & Prasad, U. D. (2016). CRM Information Technology solutions: An industry perspective. The Indian Management Researcher, 3(2), 1-23.

  • Mukerjee, H. S., Prasad, U. D., & Rao, S. P. (2017). Defining success in CRM implementation projects: An empirical study from the IT consultants’ perspective. Parikalpana: KIIT Journal of Management, 13(1), 116-125.

  • Munns, A. K., & Bjeirmi, B. F. (1996). The role of project management in achieving project success. International Journal of Project Management, 14(2), 81-87.

  • Nguyen, T. H., Sherif, J. S., & Newby, M. (2007). Strategies for successful CRM implementation. Information Management & Computer Security, 15(2), 102-115.

  • Palmatier, R. W. (2008). Relationship marketing. Cambridge. MA: Marketing Science Institute.

  • Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2006). Customer Relationship Management: from Strategy to Implementation. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(1/2), 135-168.

  • Pedersen, H. (1995). An organized approach to software selection. Journal of Property Management, 60(2), 62-65.

  • Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D. P. (1988). Project success: Definitions and measurement techniques. Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute.

  • Plouffe, C. R., Williams, B. C., & Leigh, T. W. (2004). Who’s on First? Stakeholder Differences in Customer Relationship Management and the Elusive Notion of “Shared Understanding”. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 24(4), 323-338.

  • Prasongsukarn, K. (2009). Customer relationship management: From theory to practice. AU-GSB e-JOURNAL, 2(1), 17-32.

  • Rigby, D. K., Reichheld, F. F., & Schefter, P. (2002). Avoid the Four Perils of CRM. Harvard Business Review, 80(2), 101-109.

  • Rogers, B., Stone, M., & Foss, B. (2008). Integrating the value of salespeople and systems: Adapting the benefits dependency network. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 15(4), 221-232. doi:10.1057/dbm.2008.19

  • Ryals, L., & Payne, A. (2001). Customer relationship management in financial services: towards information-enabled relationship marketing. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 9(1), 3-27. doi:10.1080/09652540010011484

  • SAP SCN. (2016). On demand or on premise-Which is better for HCM. Retrieved from http://scn.sap.com/

  • Serrador, P., & Turner, R. (2015). The relationship between project success and project efficiency. Project Management Journal, 46(1), 30-39.

  • Shenhar, A. J., Levy, O., & Dvir, D. (1997). Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project Management Journal, 28(2), 5-9.

  • Shenhar, A., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

  • Sheth, J. N., & Parvatiyar, A. (1995). The evolution of relationship marketing. International Business Review, 4(4), 397-418

  • Turner, R., & Zolin, R. (2012): Forecasting success on large projects: Developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 87-99.

  • Van Bentum, R., & Stone, M. (2005). Customer relationship management and the impact of corporate culture—A European study. The Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 13(1), 28-54.

  • Zwikael, O., & Globerson, S. (2006). From Critical Success Factors to Critical Success Processes. International Journal Of Production Research, 44(17), 3433-3449.


Abstract Views: 202

PDF Views: 0




  • Definitions of Project Success in Implementation of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Information Technology (IT) Solutions: Perspectives of Consultants from India

Abstract Views: 202  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Hory Sankar Mukerjee
Training and Assessment, Infosys Limited, Opposite ISB, IIIT-Wipro Road, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad-500032, India
U. Devi Prasad
Hyderabad Business School, GITAM University, Hyderabad Campus Rudraram, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy Dist., Telangana 502329, India

Abstract


Organizations implementing technology face two options: either to build a solution from scratch or buy a packaged solution available. While the latter is more popular option, it is not easy. It needs the help from Information Technology (IT) consultants, who would be integrating the existing IT landscape to the new solution. Implementation of IT solutions in the critical area of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) is a time consuming, costly and complex affair. While the IT consultants would drive this process, the inherent risk of failure remains, and their perception of success in this area is therefore critical.The risks of failure are high in projects and even higher in technology projects. The success factor lies in an infinite space and reasons for failures could be many. Since the role played by the IT consultants are critical, their perspective of looking at success is important, which has been an untouched area in IT/project management literature. This research note summarizes the major dimensions and outcomes of a study carried out on 105 project managers of CRM IT projects in India. The IT firms they worked for were globally established (in excess of 100,000 employees) and had an average of US$5 bn in revenues. Findings reveal that there has been a sea change in the perception of success, with customer and team satisfaction being accorded a high priority. Respondents also acknowledged the need for an enlarged project scope and the role played by a motivated team in the success of a project.

Keywords


Customer Relationship Management (CRM), India, Information Technology (IT), Project Success.

References