![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
Linking Self Efficacy and Workplace Spiritualıty in IT (Information Technology) Industry Using Structural Equation Modelling
Business scenario is changing rapidly nowadays and competition is increasing both, internally and externally in organization due to globalization, workload and mergers and acquisitions. To sustain and overcome, it is inevitable for organizations to have delighted, focused, self motivated and self directed employees. But organizations in present time are filled with employees having low inner zeal and diluted compassion. These employees are not finding meaning in work and don't feel connected to their work at the same time. It is now a herculean task for organization to enhance and improvise employees' self efficacy and workplace spirituality. This paper investigates and validates the conceptualized linkage between self efficacy and workplace spirituality in IT industry using advanced analytic techniques. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation model was applied for hypothesis testing. The result indicates a significant positive linkage between workplace spirituality and self efficacy with age and experience as moderator. This study attempts to provide an idea to the organization to enhance employee's efficacy through increased workplace spirituality and a conceptual idea also for frequently changing environment.
Keywords
Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Experience, Self-Efficacy, Workplace Spirituality.
User
Font Size
Information
- Ashmos, D. P., & Duchon, D. (2000). Spirituality at work: A conceptualization and measure. Journal of management inquiry, 9(2), 134–145.
- Axtell, C. M., & Parker, S. K. (2003). Promoting role breadth self-efficacy through involvement, work redesign and training. Human Relations, 56(1), 113–131.
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
- Bakker, A.B., & Demerouti, E. (2009). The crossover of work engagement between working couples: A closer look at the role of empathy. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(3), 220–236.
- Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Princeton-Hall.
- Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 407–415.
- Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
- Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1981). The relationship of careerrelated self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(5), 399–410.
- Chiravuri, A., & Ambrose, P. (2003, April). Investigating the effects of downsizing on software professionals’ self-efficacy and its consequences on software development quality. In Proceedings of the 2003 SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research: Freedom in Philadelphia--leveraging differences and diversity in the IT workforce (pp. 52–57). ACM.
- Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2005). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. Random House.
- Duggleby, W., Cooper, D., & Penz, K. (2009). Hope, self efficacy, spiritual well being and job satisfaction. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(11), 2376–2385.
- Ferguson, J., & Milliman, J. (2008). Creating effective core organizational values: A spiritual leadership approach. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(4), 439– 459.
- Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693–727.
- Islam, J., & Hu, H. (2012). A review of literature on contingency theory in managerial accounting. African Journal of Business Management, 6(15), 5159.
- Jason, P., & Sudha, S. (2014). Workplace spirituality: Meaning and importance in selected information technology organizations. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 3(6), 13–19.
- Kielerstajn, R. (2008). Age and work motivation: The view of older employees.
- Kinjerski, V., & Skrypnek, B. J. (2006). The spirit at work project: Creating positive outcomes in long-term care. In 10th Annual Long Term Care Winter Conference, Jasper, Alberta.
- Lencioni, P. M. (2002). Make your values mean something. Harvard Business Review, 80(7), 113–117.
- May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37.
- Olivier, A. L., & Rothmann, S. (2007). Antecedents of work engagement in a multinational company. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 33(3), 49–56.
- Parschau, L., Fleig, L., Koring, M., Lange, D., Knoll, N., Schwarzer, R., & Lippke, S. (2013). Positive experience, self efficacy, and action control predict physical activity changes: A moderated mediation analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 18(2), 395–406.
- Pratt, M. G., & Ashforth, B. E. (2003). Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline, 309–327.
- Tims, M., B. Bakker, A., & Derks, D. (2014). Daily job crafting and the self-efficacy–performance relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5), 490–507.
- Wrzesniewski, A. (2003). Finding positive meaning in work. Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline, 296–308.
- Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J. E., & Debebe, G. (2003). Interpersonal sense making and the meaning of work. Research in organizational behavior, 25, 93–135.
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/abstractview.png)
Abstract Views: 246
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/pdfview.png)
PDF Views: 94