SAMVAD: International Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Governance and Poverty Reduction in the South Asian Countries:A Perspective from Management Education


Affiliations
1 School of Management Studies, Punjabi University, Patiala, Punjab, India
 

In today’s challenging era, the developing countries contribute mostly towards the world economy. The focus of the paper is to explore the cross-national differences among the south Asian nations in order to examine the association of governance indicators to educational reforms indicators. The data is collected from World Bank website and Regression technique is used for the study. The examination discoveries demonstrate that the administration pointers-political solidness and nonappearance of brutality/fear-based oppression, administrative quality, lead of law and control of defilement contribute for the most part towards the internationalization of administration organizations, which additionally help to advance the administration instruction of South Asian nations in contrast with the worldwide benchmarks. For a decent execution of instruction regarding administration and innovation, the administration expected to assume a critical part to manage harmony amongst greatness, the administration expected to assume a critical part to manage harmony amongst greatness and value. Genuine participation in educational programs improvement, readiness of instructional material, execution of inventive practices, utilization of new advancements and advancement of community oriented research are necessities of the time.

Keywords

Governance, Internationalization, Poverty Reduction, South Asian Countries.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • A.G. (1972). Maximum likelihood estimation of regression containing unobservable independent variables. International Economic Review, 1-15.

  • ADB. (1999). Asian Development Bank fighting poverty in Asia and the Pacific: The Poverty Reduction Strategy. Asian Development Bank.

  • ADB. (2012). Administration and Governance of Higher Education in Asia: Patterns and Implications. Philippines: Asian Development Bank.

  • CICID (2006). Governance Strategy for French Development Assistance. France: Interministerial Committee on International Cooperation and Development. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan026555.pdf.

  • Enders, J. (2004). Higher Education, Internationalization and the nation state: Recent developments and challenges to Governance Theory. Springer, 361−382.

  • Enders, J., Buer, H. & Weyer, E. (2013). Regulatory Autonomy and Performance: the reforms of higher education. Springer, 5−23.

  • Gisselquist (2012). Good Governance as a Concept, and why this matters for Development policy. UNU-WIDER Working Paper, 2012−2030.

  • Henard, F. & Mitterle, A. (2009). Governance and quality guidelines in higher Education: A review of governance arrangements and quality assurance guidelines. France: OECD/Directorate for Education. p. 114. PMid: 19596347. http://www.oecd.org/education/imhe/46064461.pdf.

  • Jons, H. & Hoyler, M. (2013). Global geographies of higher education: The perspective of world university rankings. Geoforum. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.12.014.

  • Kaufmann, D. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. The World Bank Institute Global Governance Group, 1−43.

  • Kaufmann, Daniel & Kraay, A. (2008). Governance indicators: Where are we, where should we be Going? World Bank Research Observer. 1-43. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DEC/Resources/KraayKaufmannGovernanceIndicatorsSurveyNov12.pdf.

  • Khan, M. H. (2006). Corruption and Governance in South Asia: General Survey. Europa publications. p. 1-28. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/2792146.pdf.

  • Kretek, P.M., Dragšić, Ž. and Kehm, B.M. (2013) Transformation of university governance: on the role of university board members. Higher Education, 65(1), 39−58. DOI:10.1007/ s10734-012-9580-x. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/86511/.

  • Middlehurst, R. (2013). Changing internal Governance: A leadership roles and management structures in United Kingdom universities fit for the future. United Kingdom Universities Fit for the Future? Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/hequ.12018.

  • Nachuk, S. (2001). Key Issues regarding Asian Development Bank Technical Assistance on Institutional Strenthening for the Central Region Poverty Reduction in Vietnam. Asian Development Bank.

  • OECD (2003). Changing Patterns of Governance in Higher Education. Education Policy Analysis, OECD. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/educationpolicyanalysis2003edition.htm.

  • UNDP (2002). Human Development Report. New York: United Nations Development Programme. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/263/hdr_2002_en_complete.pdf.

  • Vos, R. (1996). Educational Indicators: What’s to be measured? Washington D.C, Washington, United States of America. https://publications.iadb.org/en/publication/11976/ educational-indicators-whats-be-measured.

  • WGI. (2016). Indicators - World Bank Open Data - World Bank Group, retrieved December 17, 2016, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator

  • WUN. (2013). Global Regionalisms, Governance and Higher Education. In World Universities Network. United Kingdom. https://wun.ac.uk/wun/research/view/globalregionalisms-governance-and-higher-education.

  • Zaman, K. (2016). Quality guidelines for good governance in higher education across the globe. Pacific Science Review: Humanities and Social Sciences, 1−7.


Abstract Views: 315

PDF Views: 136




  • Governance and Poverty Reduction in the South Asian Countries:A Perspective from Management Education

Abstract Views: 315  |  PDF Views: 136

Authors

Gurcharan Singh
School of Management Studies, Punjabi University, Patiala, Punjab, India
Kanwarvir Singh Khaira
School of Management Studies, Punjabi University, Patiala, Punjab, India

Abstract


In today’s challenging era, the developing countries contribute mostly towards the world economy. The focus of the paper is to explore the cross-national differences among the south Asian nations in order to examine the association of governance indicators to educational reforms indicators. The data is collected from World Bank website and Regression technique is used for the study. The examination discoveries demonstrate that the administration pointers-political solidness and nonappearance of brutality/fear-based oppression, administrative quality, lead of law and control of defilement contribute for the most part towards the internationalization of administration organizations, which additionally help to advance the administration instruction of South Asian nations in contrast with the worldwide benchmarks. For a decent execution of instruction regarding administration and innovation, the administration expected to assume a critical part to manage harmony amongst greatness, the administration expected to assume a critical part to manage harmony amongst greatness and value. Genuine participation in educational programs improvement, readiness of instructional material, execution of inventive practices, utilization of new advancements and advancement of community oriented research are necessities of the time.

Keywords


Governance, Internationalization, Poverty Reduction, South Asian Countries.

References