Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Uncitedness in Scientific Publications:A Case Study of Tribology Research


Affiliations
1 Library, IFET College of Engineering, Villupuram 605 108, Tamilnadu, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study discusses the characteristics of uncitedness and compares with cited ones. Literature on tribology research was selected as the sample and Science Citation Index Expanded of WOS is used to retrieve the related bibliographic records. The studied parameters are: yearly share, document type and language, number of references, number of authors, share of single authored papers and average number of keywords. The results show that there is a significant difference in characteristics between cited and uncited papers.

Keywords

Citation Analysis, Bibliometrics, Uncitedness.
User
About The Author

B. Elango
Library, IFET College of Engineering, Villupuram 605 108, Tamilnadu
India

Library and Librarian


Notifications

  • Schwartz, C.A. (1997). The rise and fall of uncitedness. College and Research Libraries, 58:19–29.
  • Zhao, S.X. (2015). Uncitedness of reviews. Current Science, 109(8):1377-1378.
  • Garg, K.C. and Kumar, S. (2014). Uncitedness of Indian scientific output. Current Science, 107(6):965-970.
  • Hem, E. (2014). Why am I not cited? TidsskrNorLaegeforen, 134(8):807.
  • Evidence (2012). Trends in global health R&D publication output data. UK: Evedence.
  • Price, D.J.D. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 145:510-515.
  • Hamilton, D.P. (1991). Research Papers: Who’s uncited now? Science, 251:25.
  • Jesenak, S., Kuchta, L. and Hlavaty, V. (2002). Clay science from the publication and citation analysis perspective. GeologicaCarpathica, 53(2):133-136.
  • Meho, L.I. (2007). The rise and rise of citation analysis. Physics World, 32-36.
  • Jermen, N., Letina, S. and Jokic, M. (2013). Croatian scientific productivity and visibility in the field of biology measured by journals indexed in WOS 1991-2005. PeriodicumBiologorum, 115(1):37-47.
  • Kademani, B., et al. (2013). Publications trends in materials science: a global perspective. Scientometrics, 94:1275-1295.
  • Elango, B., Rajendran, P. and Bornmann, L. (2013). Global nanotribology research output: a scientometric analysis. PLOS ONE, 8(12):e81094.
  • Elango, B. and Rajdneran, P. (2015). Global tribology research output (1998-2012): a macro level scientometric study. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 3(4):35-48.
  • Viswanathan, V. and Yugapriya, S. (2015). Soft computing: a bibliometric analysis of research outputs during 2005-2014. Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science, 4(3):243-247.
  • Stern, R.E. (1990). Uncitedness in the biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(3):193–196.
  • Gopalakrishnan, S., et al. (2015). Uncited publications in MEMS literature: a bibliometric analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 35(2):113-123.
  • Jiping, G.A.O., et al. (2015). An analysis of uncited papers in spectroscopy: from the perspectives of country, institutions and topic distributions. Science and Technology Review, 33(8): Article No.112.
  • Elango, B., Rajendran, P. and Bornmann, L. (2015). A scientometric analysis of international collaboration and growth of literature at the macro level. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 20(2):41-50.
  • Elango, B., Bornmann, L. and Shankar, S. (2016). Study of citation networks in tribology research. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 10(1):71-96.
  • Neophytou, J. (2013). Bibliometrics for journal editors – an overview. In: Smart P., Maisonneuve H. and Polderman A. (eds), Science Editors’ Handbook.
  • Lee, J.D., et al. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of human factors (1970-2000): a quantitative description of scientific impact. Human Factors, 47(4):753-766.
  • Fu, H.Z. and Ho, Y.S. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Membrane Science (1976-2010). The Electronic Library, 33(4):698-713.
  • Guimaraes, J.A. and Carlini, C.R. (2004). Most cited papers in Toxicon, Toxicon, 44(4):345-359.
  • van Raan, A.F.J. (2000). For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement, 3(1):50-62.
  • Poomkattayil, D., Bornstein, M.M. and Sendi, P. (2011). Lost in translation: the impact of publication language on citation frequency in the scientific dental literature. Swiss Medical Weekly, 141: w13148.
  • van Leeuwen, T.N., et al. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51(1):335-346.
  • van Raan, A.F.J., van Leeuwen, T.N. and Visser, M.S. (2011). Severe language effect in university rankings: particularly Germany and France are wronged in citation-based rankings. Scientometrics, 88:495-498.
  • Marx, W. and Bornmann, L. (2014). Tracing the origin of a scientific legend by Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS): the legend of the Darwin finches. Scientometrics, 99(3):839-844

Abstract Views: 333

PDF Views: 7




  • Uncitedness in Scientific Publications:A Case Study of Tribology Research

Abstract Views: 333  |  PDF Views: 7

Authors

B. Elango
Library, IFET College of Engineering, Villupuram 605 108, Tamilnadu, India

Abstract


This study discusses the characteristics of uncitedness and compares with cited ones. Literature on tribology research was selected as the sample and Science Citation Index Expanded of WOS is used to retrieve the related bibliographic records. The studied parameters are: yearly share, document type and language, number of references, number of authors, share of single authored papers and average number of keywords. The results show that there is a significant difference in characteristics between cited and uncited papers.

Keywords


Citation Analysis, Bibliometrics, Uncitedness.

References