Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Soft Keyboards for the Kannada Language: A Case Study of Searching Library OPACs for Vernacular Content through Mobile Phones


Affiliations
1 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru - 570 006, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Keyboards are the dominant Input Method Editors (IMEs) used for data input into computers. With the rise of mobile devices with touchscreen technologies, soft keyboards, also called 'on screen' or virtual keyboards, have become popular. The keyboard layout decides the data entry rate, user friendliness, and accuracy of data input. This study assesses ten soft keyboards in the Kannada language with respect to their utility for interaction with OPAC. EazyType Kannada and Google Keyboard were found to be better than others in terms of number of keystrokes required to input data. Anova and Standard deviation techniques were used to analyse the data. This study has an implication for users of OPAC in deciding the keyboard to be used on their mobile devices.

Keywords

Soft Keyboards, Onscreen Keyboards, Mobile Devices, Input Method Editors (IMEs), OPACs, Keyboard Layouts, Bibliographic Data Entry.
User
About The Authors

N. S. Harinarayana
Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru - 570 006
India

S. M. Nishchitha
Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru - 570 006
India


Notifications

  • Aoki, A.N.; Van Meurs, P. and James, C. (2009). Method and Apparatus for Text Input in Various Languages, Google Patents. Retrieved from: https://www.google.com/patents/ US7636083.

  • Brhkbd Keyboard. Data Accessed from: July 8, 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.baraha.com/help/Keyboards/ brhkbd_keyboard.htm.

  • Buzing, P. (2003). Comparing Different Keyboard Layouts: Aspects of Qwerty, Dvorak and Alphabetical Keyboards. Delft University of Technology Articles. Available at: http:// www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~buzing/Articles/keyboards.pdf.

  • Census of India: Abstract of speakers’ Strength of Languages and Mother Tongues –2001. Data Accessed: July 8, 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/ Census_Data_2001/Census_Data_Online/Language/Statement1.aspx.

  • Department of Official Language Government of India. (2014). Data Accessed: 8, 2016, Retrieved from: http:// www.rajbhasha.nic.in/UI/pagecontent.aspx?pc=MTUz.

  • Gong, J. and Tarasewich, P. (2015). Testing Predictive Text Entry Methods with Constrained Keypad Designs. In: Proceedings of Human Computer Interfaces International (HCII 05). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: ACM.

  • Hempstalk, K. (2006). The Great Keyboard Debate: QWERTY Versus Dvorak. In: Proceedings of NZCSRSC’07, the Fifth New Zealand Computer Science Research Student Conference. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/ profile/Nilufar_Baghaei/publication/241872183_Performance_ of_Evolving_IEEE_802.11_Security_Architectures/ links/00b4953223056a43f1000000.pdf#page=119.

  • Joshi, A.; Ganu, A.; Chand, A.; Parmar, V. and Mathur, G. (2004). Keylekh: A Keyboard for Text Entry in Indic Scripts. In: CHI’04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 928–942). ACM. Retrieved from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=985950

  • Kumar, H.S.; Shivakumar, A.; Rao, A.; Arun, S. and Ramakrishnan, A.G. (2011). Panmozhi Vaayil-A Multilingual Indic Keyboard Interface for Business and Personal Use. In: Information Systems for Indian Languages, p. 278–283. Springer. Retrieved from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/ 10.1007/978-3-642-19403-0_48.

  • Malsattar, N.; Emmadi, N. and Joshi, M. (2014). Testing the Efficacy of an Indic Script Virtual Keyboard: Swarachakra, p. 160. Retrieved from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2677203.

  • Noyes, J. (1983). The QWERTY Keyboard: A Review. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18(3):265–81. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(83)80010-8.

  • Noyes, J. (1998). QWERTY-the immortal keyboard. Computing Control Engineering Journal, 9(3), 117–122. Retrieved from: http://doi.org/10.1049/cce:19980302.

  • On Kannada Fonts and Software. (2012, August 28). Retrieved from: https://motso.wordpress.com/2012/08/28/ on-kannada-fonts-and-software.

  • O’Riordan, B.; Curran, K. and Woods, D. (2005). Investigating Text Input Methods for Mobile Phones. Journal of Computer Science, 1(2):189–99.

  • Seifu, A. and Lemma, D. (2013). Improving Handheld Devices Usability for Text Input Entry. HiLCoE Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 15.

  • What is Soft Keyboard (Onscreen Keyboard or Software Keyboard)? Data Accessed: July 8, 2016. Retrieved from: http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/soft-keyboard-onscreenkeyboard-or-software-keyboard.


Abstract Views: 404

PDF Views: 25




  • Soft Keyboards for the Kannada Language: A Case Study of Searching Library OPACs for Vernacular Content through Mobile Phones

Abstract Views: 404  |  PDF Views: 25

Authors

N. S. Harinarayana
Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru - 570 006, India
S. M. Nishchitha
Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru - 570 006, India

Abstract


Keyboards are the dominant Input Method Editors (IMEs) used for data input into computers. With the rise of mobile devices with touchscreen technologies, soft keyboards, also called 'on screen' or virtual keyboards, have become popular. The keyboard layout decides the data entry rate, user friendliness, and accuracy of data input. This study assesses ten soft keyboards in the Kannada language with respect to their utility for interaction with OPAC. EazyType Kannada and Google Keyboard were found to be better than others in terms of number of keystrokes required to input data. Anova and Standard deviation techniques were used to analyse the data. This study has an implication for users of OPAC in deciding the keyboard to be used on their mobile devices.

Keywords


Soft Keyboards, Onscreen Keyboards, Mobile Devices, Input Method Editors (IMEs), OPACs, Keyboard Layouts, Bibliographic Data Entry.

References