Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Mandatory Archiving and Copyright Issues of Open Access Resources in Institutional Repositories


Affiliations
1 G.J. Advani Law College, Mumbai, India
2 Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The exponential growth of number of journals and increasing prices has engendered the idea of open access among academic communities. To boost the open access movement and to make it a success many institutions, organizations and funding agencies are framing policies making it mandatory for researchers/academicians to make their intellectual publications available on open access platform. The paper aims to examine the copyright issues related to mandatory open access self-archiving and the availability of defined policies to guide the authors of scholarly publications in mandatory deposition. The relevant data for the study was collected through published literature and websites. The result shows that along with the early advocates, many other Indian institutions and publishers are also gradually moving towards the open access platform. However, sufficient information is not available on the website of institutional repository to determine the archiving rights of the authors.

Keywords

Copyright, Institutional Repository, Open Access, Self-Archiving.
User
About The Authors

Rashmi Rekha Gohain
G.J. Advani Law College, Mumbai
India

Mallikarjun Angadi
Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai
India


Notifications

  • Ahmed, S.S. & Al‐Baridi, S. (2012). An overview of institutional repository developments in the Arabian Gulf Region. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 28(2): 79-89. DOI: 10.1108/10650751211236613

  • Cassella, M. & Calvi, L. (2010). New journal models and publishing perspectives in the evolving digital environment. IFLA Journal. 36(1): 7–15. DOI: 10.1177/0340035209359559. Retreived from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035209359559

  • Hanlon, A., & Ramirez, M. (2011). Asking for permission: A survey of copyright workflows for institutional repositories. Portal: Libraries and the Academy. 11(2): 683–702. DOI: 10.1353/pla.2011.0015. Retreived from: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0015

  • Harter, S. P. & Kim, H. J. (1996). Electronic journals and scholarly communication: A citation and reference study. Information Research, 2(1). Retrieved from: http://www.informationr.net/ir/2-1/paper9a.html

  • Hu, D., Luo, A., & Liu, H. (2013). Open access in China and its effect on academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(1), 110-112. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.009

  • Rao, P. V. (2007). Institutional repositories: A key role for libraries. 5th International CALIBER -2007, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 2007 Feb 08-10. Retrieved from: http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/1944/1443/1/689-695.pdf

  • Rieh, S. Y., Jean, B. S., Yakel, E., Markey, K., & Kim, J. (2008). Perceptions and experiences of staff in the planning and implementation of institutional repositories. Library Trends. 57(2): 168–190. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1353/ lib.0.0027

  • Sahu, S. K., & Arya, S. K. (2013). Open access practices in India. Library Hi Tech News. 30(4): 6–12. DOI:10.1108/LHTN-03-2013-0011. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-03-2013-0011

  • Spezi, V., Fry, J., Creaser, C., Probets, S. & White, S. (2013). Researchers’ green open access practice: A cross-disciplinary analysis. Journal of Documentation. 69(3): 334–359. DOI: 10.1108/JD-01-2012-0008. Retrieved from: https:// doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2012-0008

  • Thorin, S. E. (2003). Global changes in scholarly communication. Libraries’ and Librarians’ Publications. Paper 17. Retrieved from: http://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=sul

  • Tise, E. R. (2011). IFLA imperatives: expounding access to information. IFLA Journal. 37(2): 158–161. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352110370020602

  • Utulu, S. C. A. & Bolarinwa, O. (2009). Open access initiatives adoption by Nigerian academics. Library Review. 58(9): 660–669. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530910997946

  • Woutersen-Windhouwer, S. (2013). The future of open access publishing in the Netherlands: constant dripping wears away the stone. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 39(1): 105–107. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.015

  • Xia, J., Gilchrist, S. B., Smith, N. X. P., Kingery, J. A., Radecki, J. R., Wilhelm, M. L., Harrison, K. C., Ashby, M. L. & Mahn, A. J. (2012). A review of open access self-archiving mandate policies. Libraries and the Academy. 12(1): 85–102. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2012.0000


Abstract Views: 391

PDF Views: 20




  • Mandatory Archiving and Copyright Issues of Open Access Resources in Institutional Repositories

Abstract Views: 391  |  PDF Views: 20

Authors

Rashmi Rekha Gohain
G.J. Advani Law College, Mumbai, India
Mallikarjun Angadi
Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India

Abstract


The exponential growth of number of journals and increasing prices has engendered the idea of open access among academic communities. To boost the open access movement and to make it a success many institutions, organizations and funding agencies are framing policies making it mandatory for researchers/academicians to make their intellectual publications available on open access platform. The paper aims to examine the copyright issues related to mandatory open access self-archiving and the availability of defined policies to guide the authors of scholarly publications in mandatory deposition. The relevant data for the study was collected through published literature and websites. The result shows that along with the early advocates, many other Indian institutions and publishers are also gradually moving towards the open access platform. However, sufficient information is not available on the website of institutional repository to determine the archiving rights of the authors.

Keywords


Copyright, Institutional Repository, Open Access, Self-Archiving.

References