Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Scientometric Study of Superconductivity Research in India from 1989 to 2014


Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore − 721 102, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper presents scientometric analysis of superconductivity research output in India from 1981 to 2014 and compares it with Global output as reported in Web of Science. The study shows that superconductivity research in India had a steep growth between 1981 and 1988, particularly an abrupt hike in 1987 is noticeable (both Indian and Global) followed by a more or less steady pattern thereafter up to 2014. The Indian growth pattern however differs from Global pattern. A sudden climb was noticed in 1987, which touched the crest in 1991. It started to descend thereafter steadily and troughed in 2003 followed by another steady rise again up to 2014. Indian trend thus shows a dip between 1992 and 2014 unlike Global pattern which was nearly steady over the span. The author productivity pattern only approximately corresponds to Lotka’s law. The number of core journals in the subject area is comparatively less as obtainable by employing Bradford’s law of scattering.

Keywords

Bradford’s Law, Growth of Literature, India, Logistic Model, Lotka’s Law, Scientometrics, Superconductivity Research.
User
About The Authors

Soumen Teli
Department of Library and Information Science, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore − 721 102, West Bengal
India

Bidyarthi Dutta
Department of Library and Information Science, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore − 721 102, West Bengal
India


Notifications

  • Superconductivity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductivity

  • Superconductivity – Encyclopedia Britannica. http://www.britannica.com/science/superconductivity

  • Sharma HP, Sen SK. (2001). Changing nature of collaboration in superconductivity research: A case study. Paper presented at NISTADS International Workshop on Emerging Trends in Science and Technology Indicators: Aspects of collaboration, New Delhi, February 20-25.

  • Uzunov Dimo I. (2007). Superconductivity research in Bulgaria, IEEE/CSC & ESAS European Superconductivity News Forum. (1):1-4. Available at: http://snf.ieeecsc.org/ sites/ieeecsc.org/files/SuperconductivityBulgaria_IV_Final_ 042907.pdf

  • Arunachalam S, Singh UN. (1985). Sophisticated science in a small country: A scientometric analysis of superconductivity research in Israel, Journal of Information Science. 10:165−71. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158501000405.

  • Zhu QL, Willett P. (2011). Bibliometric analysis of Chinese superconductivity research, 1986-2007, ASLIB Proceedings. 63(1):101−19. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531111103803.

  • Arunachalam S, Singh UN. (1984). Publication and citation patterns in the literature of a high metabolism area: The case of superconductivity in 1970, Journal of Information Science. 8(3):93. DOI: 10.1177/016555158400800301. https:// doi.org/10.1177/016555158400800301.

  • Barth A, Marx WJ. (2008). Mapping high-temperature superconductors: A scientometric approach, Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism. 21:113. DOI:10.1007/s10948-0080307-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-008-0307-2.

  • Nadel E. (1981). Citation and co-citation indicators of a phased impact of the BCS theory in the physics of superconductivity, Scientometrics. 3(3):203−21.

  • Chu H. (1992). Communication between Chinese and non-Chinese scientists in the discovery of high-Tc superconductor: I. The formal perspective, Scientometrics. 25(2):229. DOI: 10.1007/BF02028084. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028084.

  • Sanderson K. (2006), Superconductivity research is down but not out, Nature. 7110:376. https://doi.org/10.1038/443376b.

  • Cardona M, Marx W. (2006). Vitaly L. Ginzburg - A bibliometric study, Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism. 19(3-5):459−66.

  • Chu H. (1992a). Communication between Chinese and non-Chinese scientists in the discovery of high-Tc superconductors: 1. The formal perspective, Scientometrics. 25(2):229−32.

  • Chu H. (1992b). Communication between Chinese and non-Chinese scientists in the discovery of high-Tc superconductors: 2. The informal perspective, Scientometrics. 25(2):253−77.

  • Chu H. (1998). Superconductivity research in China revised: a citation analysis of the literature published between 1987-1989 (in Chinese), R&D in World Science and Technology. 20(3):135−38.

  • Garfield E. (1988, 2nd May). The 1987 Nobel Prize in Physics: citations to K.A. Muller and J.G. Bednorz’s seminal work mirror developments in superconductivity, Current Contents. 3−11.

  • Garfield E. (1990, 30th April). The most-cited 1987 physicalsciences articles: Superconductivity supersedes superstrings, Current Contents. 3−14.


Abstract Views: 369

PDF Views: 15




  • Scientometric Study of Superconductivity Research in India from 1989 to 2014

Abstract Views: 369  |  PDF Views: 15

Authors

Soumen Teli
Department of Library and Information Science, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore − 721 102, West Bengal, India
Bidyarthi Dutta
Department of Library and Information Science, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore − 721 102, West Bengal, India

Abstract


This paper presents scientometric analysis of superconductivity research output in India from 1981 to 2014 and compares it with Global output as reported in Web of Science. The study shows that superconductivity research in India had a steep growth between 1981 and 1988, particularly an abrupt hike in 1987 is noticeable (both Indian and Global) followed by a more or less steady pattern thereafter up to 2014. The Indian growth pattern however differs from Global pattern. A sudden climb was noticed in 1987, which touched the crest in 1991. It started to descend thereafter steadily and troughed in 2003 followed by another steady rise again up to 2014. Indian trend thus shows a dip between 1992 and 2014 unlike Global pattern which was nearly steady over the span. The author productivity pattern only approximately corresponds to Lotka’s law. The number of core journals in the subject area is comparatively less as obtainable by employing Bradford’s law of scattering.

Keywords


Bradford’s Law, Growth of Literature, India, Logistic Model, Lotka’s Law, Scientometrics, Superconductivity Research.

References