Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Students’ Perception of Building a Digital Repository for the Intellectual Outputs of Saudi Scholarship Students


Affiliations
1 Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Saudi Arabia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The intellectual output of students may receive insufficient attention in terms of preservation and distribution. The present study focuses on the perceptions of students toward a digital repository for collecting the works of students awarded scholarships. The study found that majority of participants have the desire to archive or publish in a digital repository because they appreciate the quality of students’ research and trust it when writing projects and study reports. However, only a small proportion of participants understood about digital repositories and a few of them had previous experience in publishing their works online. The findings indicated that copyright infringement is the biggest concern that prevents participants from depositing their work, followed by the unawareness about a university repository or appropriate digital repositories that accept students’ work.

Keywords

Archives, Archiving Students’ Work, Digital Repositories, Institutional Repositories, Open Access Publishing, Saudi Culture Missions, Scholarship Students.
User
About The Author

Abdullah Almobarraz
Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU)
Saudi Arabia


Notifications

  • Alzuhairi T. and Alsa’di A. (2014). Digital repositories systems and assessment criteria, Iraqi Journal for Information Technology. 6(2):25-39.

  • Hertenstein E. (2014). Student scholarship in institutional repositories, Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 2(3):13. Crossref.

  • Barandiaran D., Rozum B. and Thoms B. (2014). Focusing on student research in the institutional repository DigitalCommons@ USU, College and Research Libraries News. 75(10):546-49. Crossref.

  • Pickton M. and McKnight C. (2007). Is there a role for research students in an institutional repository? Some repository managers’ views, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 39(3):153-61. Crossref.

  • Nolan CW. and Costanza J. (2006). Promoting and archiving student work through an institutional repository: Trinity University, LASR, and the Digital Commons. Serials Review. 32(2):92-98. Crossref.

  • Jones J. and Canuel R. Supporting the Dissemination of Undergraduate Research: An Emerging Role for Academic Librarians. In: Imagine, Innovate, Inspire: The Proceedings of the ACRL 2013 Conference; April 2013. p. 538-45.

  • Rozum B., Thoms B., Bates S. and Barandiaran D. (2015). We have only scratched the surface: The role of student research in institutional repositories, Utah State University. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1062&context=lib_present.

  • Stern D. (2014). Student embargoes within institutional repositories: Faculty early transparency concerns, Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 2(2):6. Crossref.

  • Passehl-Stoddart E. and Monge R. (2014). From freshman to graduate: Making the case for student-centric institutional repositories, Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 2(3):6. Crossref.

  • Anderson R., Arndell M. and Christensen S. (2009). Architecture studio archive: A case study in the comprehensive digital capture and repository of student design work as an aid to teaching, research, and accreditation, Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 40(4):286-304. Crossref.

  • Bhardwaj RK. and Kaushik S. (2013). An institutional repository for undergraduate students: A case study at St. Stephen’s College, University of Delhi (India), Legal Information Management. 13(01):52-62. Crossref.

  • Stanton KV. and Liew CL. (2011). Open access theses in institutional repositories: An exploratory study of the perceptions of doctoral students, Information Research: An International Electronic Journal. 16(4).

  • Hahn E., and Wyatt A. (2014). Business faculty’s attitudes: open access, disciplinary repositories, and institutional repositories, Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship. 19:93-113. Crossref.

  • ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee (2015). Environmental scan 2015. http:// www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/whitepapers/EnvironmentalScan15.pdf.

  • Kocken GJ. and Wical SH. (2013). “I’ve never heard of it before”: Awareness of open access at a small liberal arts university, Behavioral and Social Science Librarian. 32:14054. Crossref.

  • Dutta G. and Paul D. (2014). Awareness on institutional repositoriesrelated issues by faculty of university of Calcutta, DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology. 34(4):293-97. Crossref.

  • Mercer H. (2011). Almost halfway there: An analysis of the open access behaviors of academic librarians, College and Research Libraries. 72(5):443-53. Crossref.

  • Walkington H. and Jenkins A. (2008). Embedding undergraduate research publication in the student learning experience, Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching. 2(3):2.

  • Dawson PH. and Yang SQ. (2016). Institutional repositories, open access and copyright: What are the practices and implications? Science and Technology Libraries. 35(4):27994. Crossref.

  • Chen H. (2010). The promise of e-portfolios to improve learning and help students, faculty, and employers. Liberal Education blog, June 3, 2010. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. https://www.aacu.org/leap/liberal-education-nation-blog/promise-e-portfoliosimprove-learning-and-help-students-faculty.

  • Mahammoda SA. (2016). Factors affecting the quality of undergraduate research work in Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia, International Journal of Innovative Research and Development. 5(12):23-27.

  • Waycott J., Sheard J., Thompson C. and Clerehan R. (2013). Making students’ work visible on the social web: A blessing or a curse? Computers and Education. 68:86-95. Crossref.

  • Singeh FW., Abrizah A. and Karim NHA. (2013). What inhibits authors to self-archive in open access repositories? A Malaysian case, Information Development, 29(1):24-35. Crossref.

  • Yang Z. and Li Y. (2015). University faculty awareness and attitudes towards open access publishing and the institutional repository: A case study, Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1). Retrieved from: https:// jlsc-pub.org/articles/abstract/10.7710/2162-3309.1210/, Crossref.

  • Foster NF. and Gibbons S. (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories, D‐Lib Magazine. 11(1). Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED490029, Crossref.

  • Abrizah A., Hilmi M. and Kassim NA. (2015). Resourcesharing through an inter-institutional repository, The Electronic Library. 33(4):730-48. Crossref.

  • Kim J. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories, The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 37(3):246-54. Crossref.

  • Madan CR. and Teitge BD. (2013). The benefits of undergraduate research: The student’s perspective, The Mentor: An Academic Advising Journal. Retrieved from: https://dus.psu.edu/mentor/2013/05/undergraduate-research-studentsperspective/.


Abstract Views: 401

PDF Views: 17




  • Students’ Perception of Building a Digital Repository for the Intellectual Outputs of Saudi Scholarship Students

Abstract Views: 401  |  PDF Views: 17

Authors

Abdullah Almobarraz
Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Saudi Arabia

Abstract


The intellectual output of students may receive insufficient attention in terms of preservation and distribution. The present study focuses on the perceptions of students toward a digital repository for collecting the works of students awarded scholarships. The study found that majority of participants have the desire to archive or publish in a digital repository because they appreciate the quality of students’ research and trust it when writing projects and study reports. However, only a small proportion of participants understood about digital repositories and a few of them had previous experience in publishing their works online. The findings indicated that copyright infringement is the biggest concern that prevents participants from depositing their work, followed by the unawareness about a university repository or appropriate digital repositories that accept students’ work.

Keywords


Archives, Archiving Students’ Work, Digital Repositories, Institutional Repositories, Open Access Publishing, Saudi Culture Missions, Scholarship Students.

References