Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparative Study of Scopus and Web of Science: Climate Related Literature Retrieval


Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata - 700032, West Bengal, India
2 Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Institute of Education, Baruipur, Kolkata - 700144, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


There are various databases to retrieve information; sometimes users find it difficult to select the material to be read. To make the right decision for selecting the appropriate database there are some important factors such as coverage, functionality etc. This paper compares two popular bibliographic databases - Web of Science and Scopus for their coverage and retrieval of Climate related literature. Four keywords were used to carry out the searches and the paper examines the weakness and strength of these two databases.

Keywords

Climate Research, Coverage, Databases, Information Retrieval, Scopus, Web of Science.
User
About The Authors

Arijit Das
Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata - 700032, West Bengal
India

Sukanya Mondal
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Institute of Education, Baruipur, Kolkata - 700144, West Bengal
India


Notifications

  • Archambault, E., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y. & Lariviere, V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the web of science and scopus, arXiv: 0903.5254, doi:10.1002/ asi.21062. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21062.

  • Bar-Ilan, J, Levene, M. & Lin, A. (2007). Some measures for comparing citation databases. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.08.001.

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index? A comparison of WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74, 257–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y.

  • Bartol, T. et al. (2014). Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science from the viewpoint of national research evaluation in Slovenia. Scientometrics. 98, 1491-504. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1148-8.

  • Chadegani, A. et al. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Social Science, 9, 1911-2025. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18.

  • Elsevier (2018). Scopus. Accessed on 15 Feb 2018. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus.

  • Garfield, E. (1963). Science citation index. Science Citation Index 1961, 1(16). Available at: http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/ papers/80.pdf.

  • Glanzel, W. & Moed, H. F. (2012). Opinion paper: Thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0898-z. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-012-0898-z.

  • Lasda Bergman, E. M. (2012). Finding citations to social work literature: The relative benefits of using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38, 370-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.002.

  • Leydesdorff, L., Moya-Anegón (de), F. & Guerrero-Bote, V. P. (2010). Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: A comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 352–69.

  • Lopez-Illescas, C., MoyaAnegon (de), F. & Moed, H. F. (2009). Comparing bibliometric country-by-country. Rankings derived from the Web of Science and Scopus: The effect of poorly cited journals in Oncology. Journal of Information Science, 35, 244–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508098603.

  • Lopez-Illescas, C., Moya-Anegon, F. & Moed, H. F. (2008). Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 304-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001.

  • Meho, L. I. & Sugimoto, C. R. (2009). Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies: A tale of two citation databases— Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2499– 508. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21165.

  • The Free Dictionary by FARLEX (2018a). Cyclone definition. Accessed on 03 Mar 2018. Available at: https://www.thefreedictionary.com/cyclone.

  • The Free Dictionary by FARLEX (2018b). El Nino definition. Accessed on 03 Mar 2018. Available at: https://www.thefreedictionary.com/el+nino.

  • The Free Dictionary by FARLEX (2018c). Jet stream definition. Accessed on 05 Mar 2018. Available at: https://www.thefreedictionary.com/jet+stream.

  • The Free Dictionary by FARLEX (2018d). Monsoon definition. Accessed on 05 Mar 2018. Available at: https://www.thefreedictionary.com/monsoon.

  • Thomson Scientific (2018). Web of Science. Accessed on 26 Feb 2018. Available at: http://scientific.thomson.com/products/ WoS/.

  • Web of Science, Clarivate Analytics (2018). Accessed on 28 Feb 2018. Available at: https://clarivate.libguides.com/webofscienceplatform/.

  • Zibareva, I., & Soloshenko, N. (2011). Russian scientific publications 2005–2009 in the science citation index, Scopus, and chemical abstracts databases. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 38, 212–23. https://doi.org/10.3103/ S0147688211030178.


Abstract Views: 948

PDF Views: 18




  • A Comparative Study of Scopus and Web of Science: Climate Related Literature Retrieval

Abstract Views: 948  |  PDF Views: 18

Authors

Arijit Das
Department of Library and Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata - 700032, West Bengal, India
Sukanya Mondal
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Institute of Education, Baruipur, Kolkata - 700144, West Bengal, India

Abstract


There are various databases to retrieve information; sometimes users find it difficult to select the material to be read. To make the right decision for selecting the appropriate database there are some important factors such as coverage, functionality etc. This paper compares two popular bibliographic databases - Web of Science and Scopus for their coverage and retrieval of Climate related literature. Four keywords were used to carry out the searches and the paper examines the weakness and strength of these two databases.

Keywords


Climate Research, Coverage, Databases, Information Retrieval, Scopus, Web of Science.

References