Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Familiarity of Web 2.0 and its Application in Learning: A Case Study of Seven Indian Universities


Affiliations
1 P. G. Department of Library and Information Science, Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar - 768109, Odisha, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The changed learning environment has necessitated formation of interactive networks for sharing, participation and collaboration. The Web 2.0 tools provide avenues in this regard. The present study aims to investigate the level of integration of these tools into the learning practices of the students of seven general universities in the state of Odisha in eastern India. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 1000 postgraduate students and research scholars segregated into four major disciplines, Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences, Pure Sciences, and Applied Sciences and Technology. The findings revealed that Web 2.0 awareness is high among the students of Applied Sciences and Technology as compared to the other disciplines. More than half of the students of theoretical sciences are unaware about popular tools like blogs. Because of the popularity of the tools like Wikipedia and Scribd as sources of academic content, most of the students are familiar with wiki and document sharing tools respectively. However, the use of these tools for learning has remained trivial among the students.

Keywords

Social Bookmarking, Education 2.0, Learning 2.0, Social Networking, Video Sharing, Web 2.0, Wiki, Blog.
User
About The Authors

Sabitri Majhi
P. G. Department of Library and Information Science, Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar - 768109, Odisha
India

Bulu Maharana
P. G. Department of Library and Information Science, Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar - 768109, Odisha
India


Notifications

  • Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning? Educause. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0621.pdf.
  • Amir, Z. Ismail, K. & Hussin, S. (2011). Blogs in Language Learning: Maximizing Students’ Collaborative Writing, Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.079.
  • Biasutti, M. (2011). The student experience of a collaborative e-learning university module. Computers and Education, 57(3), 1865–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.006.
  • Chan, C. & Cmor, D. (2009). Blogging toward information literacy: Engaging students and facilitating peer learning. Reference Services Review, 37(4), 395–407. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0090- 7324&volume= 37&issue=4&articleid=1823963.
  • Chang, C. C. et al. (2014). Using e-portfolios to elevate knowledge amassment among university students. Computers & Education, 72, 187–95. www.elsevier.com/locate/compedu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.015.
  • Chang, J., Wang, E. & Chao, R. (2009). Using constructivism and scaffolding theories to explore learning style and effect in blog system environment. MIS Review, 15(1), 29–61.
  • Chu, S. K. W., Chan, C. K. K. & Tiwari, A. F.Y (2012). Using blogs to support learning during internship. Computers and Education, 58(3), 989-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.027.
  • Downes, S. (2008). Places to Go: YouTube. Innovate Journal of Online Education, 4(5). Available at: http://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=633&action=article.
  • Kang, I., Curtis J. Bonk, C. J. & Kim, M. C. (2011). A case study of blog-based learning in Korea: Technology becomes pedagogy. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 227-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.002.
  • Kelleher, T. & Miller, B. M. (2006). Organizational Blogs and the Human Voice: Relational Strategies and Relational Outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 395–414. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00019.x.
  • Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Maton, K., Krause, K., Bishop, A., Chang, R. & Churchward, A. (2007). The next generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings. Proceedings ASCLITE Singapore 2007, 517-25. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/ procs/kennedy.pdf.
  • Kim, H. N. (2008). The phenomenon of blogs and theoretical model of blog use in educational contexts. Computers and Education, 51(3), 1342-52, ISSN 0360-1315 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131508000158.
  • Kundi, G. M. & Nawaz, A. (2014). From e-Learning 1.0 to e-Learning 2.0: Threats and Opportunities for Higher Education Institutions in the Developing Countries. European Journal of Sustainable Development 3(1), 145-60. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2014.v3n1p145.
  • Kuteeva, M. (2011) Wikis and academic writing: Changing the writer–reader relationship. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.04.007.
  • Mahmud, A. H. & Hassanuzzaman, M (2009). The role of Web 2.0 tools in collaborative learning. Master Thesis. School of Economics and Management. Lund University.
  • Nath, K. (2014). Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 - Evolution of the Web and its Various Challenges. Proceedings of Optimization, Reliability, and Information Technology (ICROIT), 86–89. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/sububasistha/ web-10-to-web-30-evolution-of-the-web-and-its-variouscha...
  • Parker & Chao (2007) Wiki as a Teaching Tool. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3. Retroeved from http://www.ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p057-072Parker284.pdf.
  • Pascu, C. (2008). An Empirical Analysis of the Creation, Use and Adoption of Social Computing Applications. IPTS Exploratory Research on Social Computing. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, EUR 23415 EN. Retroeved from http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC46431.pdf.
  • Pymm, B. & Hay, L. (2013). Using Etherpads as platforms for collaborative learning in a distance education LIS course .iConference 2013 Proceedings, 965-70.
  • Sidek, E. A. R. & Yunus, M. M. (2012). Students’ Experiences on Using Blog as Learning Journals. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 67, 135-43.
  • Tang, E. & Lam C. (2012). Building an effective Online Learning Community (OLC) in blog-based teaching portfolios. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 79-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.002.
  • VIRCUS (S). (2008). Use of web2.0 technologies in LIS education: Experiences at Tallin University, Estonia. Electronic Library and Information Systems, 42(3); 262-74. Retrieved on 25/04/09. Retrieved from www.emeraldinsight.com/0033-0337.htm.
  • Wang K. T., Huang, Y., Jeng Y. L. & Wang T. (2008). A blogbased dynamic learning map, Computers and Education, 51(1), 262-78. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.005.
  • Wang, J., Zou, B., Wang, D. & Xing, M. (2013). Students’ perception of a wiki platform and the impact of wiki engagement on intercultural communication. System, Volume, 41(2), 245-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.04.004.

Abstract Views: 437

PDF Views: 14




  • Familiarity of Web 2.0 and its Application in Learning: A Case Study of Seven Indian Universities

Abstract Views: 437  |  PDF Views: 14

Authors

Sabitri Majhi
P. G. Department of Library and Information Science, Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar - 768109, Odisha, India
Bulu Maharana
P. G. Department of Library and Information Science, Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar - 768109, Odisha, India

Abstract


The changed learning environment has necessitated formation of interactive networks for sharing, participation and collaboration. The Web 2.0 tools provide avenues in this regard. The present study aims to investigate the level of integration of these tools into the learning practices of the students of seven general universities in the state of Odisha in eastern India. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 1000 postgraduate students and research scholars segregated into four major disciplines, Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences, Pure Sciences, and Applied Sciences and Technology. The findings revealed that Web 2.0 awareness is high among the students of Applied Sciences and Technology as compared to the other disciplines. More than half of the students of theoretical sciences are unaware about popular tools like blogs. Because of the popularity of the tools like Wikipedia and Scribd as sources of academic content, most of the students are familiar with wiki and document sharing tools respectively. However, the use of these tools for learning has remained trivial among the students.

Keywords


Social Bookmarking, Education 2.0, Learning 2.0, Social Networking, Video Sharing, Web 2.0, Wiki, Blog.

References