Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessment of Self Archiving in Digital Repositories: Is there any Difference between Science and Agriculture Scholars?


Affiliations
1 University of Peradeniya, Galaha Rd – 20400, Sri Lanka
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study examines the differences in scholarly publishing and self-archiving practices of academic scholars in the faculties of agriculture and science in University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. Survey method was adapted and a questionnaire specifically designed was used to achieve the objectives of the study. The study population consisted of all permanent academic staff in the two faculties. The study established that majority of the respondents of both faculties were aware of self-archiving concept as a means for providing open access but not many of them had experience in self-archiving. Majority of respondents from both faculties began this activity two to three years ago and they learnt about self-archiving by working in a field with established subject based archives. The original motivators for self-archiving were self motivation and declared citation advantage of open access papers. Agriculture scholars deposited more full text articles in digital repositories than science scholars. When analyzing the results of this study, it was proved that most of the scholars in agriculture faculty preferred to deposit conference papers while science scholars mostly preferred preprint materials. PDF is the most preferred file format to deposit in the digital repositories.

Keywords

Agriculture Scholars, Digital Repository, Science Scholars, Self Archving, Sri Lanka.
User
About The Author

Chamani Gunasekera
University of Peradeniya, Galaha Rd – 20400
Sri Lanka


Notifications

  • Andrew, T. (2003). Trends in Self-Posting of Research Material Online by Academic Staff. Ariadne, Issue 37. Accessed on 12.06.2016. Retrieved from: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/ issue37/andrew/.

  • Brown, A. (1998). Organizational culture. 2nd ed. London: Financial Times: Pitman Publishing; https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.2.176.

  • Harnad, S. (1998). Free at last: The future of peer-reviewed journals. D-Lib Magazine, 5, 12. Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12harnad.html on 12/09/2016.

  • Harnad, S. (1999). Re: Free Access vs. Open Access. SPARC-IR, 15. Accessed on 12/08/2016. Retrieved from https://mx2.arl.org/Lists/SPARC-IR/Message/167.html.

  • Harnad, S. and Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of Open Access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). Accessed on 09.12.0216. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/260207/1/06harnad.html.

  • Kim, J. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 246–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.017.

  • Lawal, I. (2002). Scholarly Communication: The Use and NonUse of E-Print Archives for the Dissemination of Scientific Information. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 36. Accessed on 11.12.2016. Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/02-fall/article3.html.

  • Mackie, M. (2004). Filling institutional repositories: Practical strategies from the DAEDA LUS project. Ariadne, 39. Accessed on 24.03.2017. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk.library/issue39/mackie/.

  • Pinfield, S. (2004) Self-archiving publications. In: G.E. Gorman and F. Rowland (eds), International Yearbook of Library and Information Management 2004/2005: Scholarly Publishing in an Electronic Era. London: Facet Publishing; 118-45.

  • Rumsey, S. (2006). The purpose of institutional repositories in UK higher education: A repository manager’s view. International Journal of Information Management, 26, 181– 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.01.002.

  • Singeh, F. W.; Abrizah, A. and Karim, N. (2013). What inhibits authors to self-archive in open access repositories? A Malaysian case. Information Development, 29(1), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666912450450.

  • Suber, P. (2010). Open Access Overview: Focusing on Open Access to Peer-Reviewed Research Articles and their Preprints. Accessed on 12.09.2016. Retrieved from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm.

  • Swan, A. (2005). Open Access self-archiving: An introduction. Accessed on 15.10.2016. Retrieved from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/11006/01/jiscsum.pdf.

  • Swan, A. and Brown, S. (2004). Open access self-archiving: an author study. Cornwall, UK: Key Perspectives Limited. Accessed on 04.10.2016. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Open%20Access%20Self%20 Archiving-an%20author%20student.pdf.

  • Xia, J. (2007). Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Across disciplines. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33, 647–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.020.


Abstract Views: 442

PDF Views: 20




  • Assessment of Self Archiving in Digital Repositories: Is there any Difference between Science and Agriculture Scholars?

Abstract Views: 442  |  PDF Views: 20

Authors

Chamani Gunasekera
University of Peradeniya, Galaha Rd – 20400, Sri Lanka

Abstract


This study examines the differences in scholarly publishing and self-archiving practices of academic scholars in the faculties of agriculture and science in University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. Survey method was adapted and a questionnaire specifically designed was used to achieve the objectives of the study. The study population consisted of all permanent academic staff in the two faculties. The study established that majority of the respondents of both faculties were aware of self-archiving concept as a means for providing open access but not many of them had experience in self-archiving. Majority of respondents from both faculties began this activity two to three years ago and they learnt about self-archiving by working in a field with established subject based archives. The original motivators for self-archiving were self motivation and declared citation advantage of open access papers. Agriculture scholars deposited more full text articles in digital repositories than science scholars. When analyzing the results of this study, it was proved that most of the scholars in agriculture faculty preferred to deposit conference papers while science scholars mostly preferred preprint materials. PDF is the most preferred file format to deposit in the digital repositories.

Keywords


Agriculture Scholars, Digital Repository, Science Scholars, Self Archving, Sri Lanka.

References