Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Balanced Development using Ontology-Based Tantra Framework


Affiliations
1 PES University, 100 Feet Outer Ring Road, Bangalore – 560085, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The idea of Balanced Development is to ensure equitable distribution of necessities of life and creation of productive remunerative employment across society. Balanced development is a prerequisite for sustainable economic growth and shared prosperity. To facilitate this challenging task, we have proposed an Ontology-based Tantra Social Information Management Framework that can help set goals, design and evaluate interventions, define and monitor relevant metrics in an ongoing basis. Tantra Framework represents social information using ideas from Zachman Framework and concepts from Unified Foundational Ontology. Tantra Framework inter-operates with well-regarded models. Balanced Scorecard is used to define development objectives. Bartels’ Theory of Separations is used to identify barriers to access, consumption and profitable participation. Theory of Change process is used to arrive at right intervention. Distributed Ledgers are proposed to handle Change Management. A Social Information Management Process is proposed to keep the framework populated, complete and current. Tantra Framework can lead to broader Digital Governance Framework with strong cognizance of Social dimension. The paper explains how Tantra Framework can be used to realize Economic Development in Indian context.

Keywords

Balanced Development, Balanced Scorecard, Ontology, Theory of Change, Zachman Framework
User
About The Authors

Shreekanth M. Prabhu
PES University, 100 Feet Outer Ring Road, Bangalore – 560085
India

K. N. Balasubramanya Murthy
PES University, 100 Feet Outer Ring Road, Bangalore – 560085
India

Subramanyam Natarajan
PES University, 100 Feet Outer Ring Road, Bangalore – 560085
India


Notifications

  • Bartels, Robert (1968). The General Theory of Marketing, The General of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 32(1): 29-33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1249193.
  • BMC Software, How to embrace ITIL as an organization, https://youtu.be/jkrQWDOGf.
  • Easley, David and Kleinberg, Jon (2010) Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press; 2000. https://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/networks-book/.
  • Kaplan, Robert S. (2010). Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard, Working Paper. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/10-074_0bf3c151-f82b-4592-b885-cdde7f5d97a6.pdf.
  • Khan, Faheem Jehangir (2008). Balanced Development, Working Paper. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315791425.
  • Martian, Patricia Yancey and Turner, Barry A. (1986), Grounded Theory and Organizational Research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638602200207.
  • Myers, Michael David (June1997). Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/249422.
  • Rik Maes (1999). A Generic Framework for Information Management. Primavera Working Paper, 99-03, Universiteit van Amsterdam. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242321998_A_Generic_Framework_for_Information_Management.
  • Santos Jr, Paulo et. al. (2013). An ontology-based analysis and semantics for organizational structure modelling in the ARIS method. Information Systems Journal, 38(5):690-708. DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2012.09.004.
  • Tarafdar, Monideepa and Singh, Ramendra (December 2011). A Market Separations Perspective to Analyze the Role of ICT in Development at the Bottom of the Pyramid (ROP). 4th Annual SIG Globdev Workshop, Association for Information Systems, Shanghai, China. http://www.research.lancs.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/a-market-separations-perspective-to-analyze-the-role-of-ict-in-developmentat-the-bottom-of-the-pyramid-rop(28a46534-089d-416e-baa6-006f645eeafd).html.
  • TM Forum, Frameworx. https://www.tmforum.org/tm-forum-frameworx-2.
  • Weiss (1995). Nothing as Practical as Good Theory: Exploring Theory-Based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families. In: New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, Concepts, Methods, and Contexts, Edited by Connel, Kubisch and Scorr. ISBN 0-89843-167-O. https://www.scribd.com/ document/150652416/Nothing-as-Practical-as-a-Good-Theory-Exploring-Theory-Based-Evaluation-for-Comprehensive-Community-Initiatives-for-Children-and-Families.
  • Zachman, John A (2003). Zachman Framework, A Primer for Enterprise Engineering and Manufacturing. http://www.zachmaninternational.com.
  • Zachman, John A (2007). The Framework for Enterprise Architecture: Background, Description and Utility. https://www.zachman.com/resources/ea-articles-reference/ 327-the-framework-for-enterprise-architecture-background-description-and-utility-by-john-a-zachman.

Abstract Views: 387

PDF Views: 21




  • Balanced Development using Ontology-Based Tantra Framework

Abstract Views: 387  |  PDF Views: 21

Authors

Shreekanth M. Prabhu
PES University, 100 Feet Outer Ring Road, Bangalore – 560085, India
K. N. Balasubramanya Murthy
PES University, 100 Feet Outer Ring Road, Bangalore – 560085, India
Subramanyam Natarajan
PES University, 100 Feet Outer Ring Road, Bangalore – 560085, India

Abstract


The idea of Balanced Development is to ensure equitable distribution of necessities of life and creation of productive remunerative employment across society. Balanced development is a prerequisite for sustainable economic growth and shared prosperity. To facilitate this challenging task, we have proposed an Ontology-based Tantra Social Information Management Framework that can help set goals, design and evaluate interventions, define and monitor relevant metrics in an ongoing basis. Tantra Framework represents social information using ideas from Zachman Framework and concepts from Unified Foundational Ontology. Tantra Framework inter-operates with well-regarded models. Balanced Scorecard is used to define development objectives. Bartels’ Theory of Separations is used to identify barriers to access, consumption and profitable participation. Theory of Change process is used to arrive at right intervention. Distributed Ledgers are proposed to handle Change Management. A Social Information Management Process is proposed to keep the framework populated, complete and current. Tantra Framework can lead to broader Digital Governance Framework with strong cognizance of Social dimension. The paper explains how Tantra Framework can be used to realize Economic Development in Indian context.

Keywords


Balanced Development, Balanced Scorecard, Ontology, Theory of Change, Zachman Framework

References