Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Effects of Dimensions of Organizational Structure on Innovation in Business School Libraries in India:An Empirical Study


Affiliations
1 Tripura University (A Central University), Suryamaninagar (W), Agartala - 799 022, Tripura, India
2 Department of Library and Information Science, Samabalpur University, Jyoti Vihar, Burla - 768019, Sambalpur, Odisha, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Purpose: In an intensely competitive and changing environment, innovation can be considered as a survival strategy. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of organization structure on innovation in business school libraries in India. Design/methodology/approach: The study focused on libraries of leading business schools, viz., IIMs,. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data for this study. The quantitative data were analyzed to test the hypothesis. Findings: The dimensions of organizational structure i.e., vertical complexity, employee participation and organizational complexity are positively related to innovation and have higher OS influence in innovation among business school libraries. On the other hand, increase in formalization, the degree of centralization and strict adherence to pre-defined roles and rigid rules in the organization are negatively related to innovation. Research Limitations: The study is limited to libraries of Indian Institutes of Management (IIM) India. Thus, other scientific and technical libraries are not in the ambit of this study. Originality/value: In India, there is no study conducted in academic management libraries. This study can be used as a guide for library administrators to accomplish the objectives of the organization by enabling innovation in the context of organizational structure.

Keywords

Academic Management Library, IIMs, Indian Management Schools, Library Innovation, Organizational Structure, Organizational Innovation, Structural Dimensions.
User
About The Authors

Champeswar Mishra
Tripura University (A Central University), Suryamaninagar (W), Agartala - 799 022, Tripura
India

Bulu Maharana
Department of Library and Information Science, Samabalpur University, Jyoti Vihar, Burla - 768019, Sambalpur, Odisha
India


Notifications

  • Adeyoyin, S. O. (2006). Managing the library’s corporate culture for organizational efficiency, productivity, and enhanced service. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 75.

  • Ahuja, G., Lampert, C. M., & Tandon, V. (2008). Moving beyond Schumpeter: management research on the determinants of technological innovation. Academy of Management Annals. 2(1): 1-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211446

  • Aiken, M., Bacharach, S. B., and French, J. L. (1980). Organizational structure, work process, and proposal making in administrative bureaucracies. Academy of Management Journal. 23(4): 631-652. https://doi.org/10.2307/255553

  • Bandelin, J. M. (1999). “The academic library: Its context, its purpose, and its operation”. Reference & User Services Quarterly. 38(2): 220.

  • Bommer, M., & Jalajas, D. S. (2004). Innovation sources of large and small technology-based firms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 51(1): 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.822462

  • Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. Social Science Paperback, London, Tavistock: 104-108.

  • Chang, C. C., & Wu, C. C. (2013). “Multilevel analysis of work context and social support climate in libraries”. In ASLIB Proceedings: New Information Perspectives. 65(6): 644-658. https://doi.org/10.1108/AP-05-2012-0051

  • Chen, C. J., & Huang, J. W. (2007). How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management-the social interaction perspective. International Journal of Information Management. 27(2): 104-118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.11.001

  • Daft, R. L. (2015). Organization theory and design: Cengage Learning.

  • Damanpour, F. (1988). Innovation type, radicalness, and the adoption process. Communication Research. 15(5): 545-567. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015005003

  • Damanpour, F. (2010).An integration of research findings of the effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. British Journal of Management. 21(4): 996-1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14678551.2009.00628.x

  • Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2012). Organizational structure and innovation revisited: From organic to ambidextrous structure. In Handbook of organizational creativity. 483-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-3747143.00019-7

  • Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (1998). Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 15(1): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00029-5

  • Dasgupta, M., Gupta, R. K., & Sahay, A. (2011). Linking technological innovation, technology strategy and organizational factors: A review. Global Business Review. 12(2): 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/097215091101200206

  • Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science. 32(11): 1422-1433. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422

  • Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation, in R. Kilman & L. Pondy (eds.) The Management of Organizational Design. New York: North-Holland: 167-188.

  • Ettlie, J. E. (1983). Organizational policy and innovation among suppliers to the food processing sector. Academy of Management Journal. 26(1): 27-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/256133

  • Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’keefe, R. D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science. 30(6): 682695. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.6.682

  • Fowler, R. K. (1998). The university library as a learning organization for innovation: an exploratory study. College & Research Libraries. 59(3): 220-231. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.59.3.220

  • Fredrickson, J. W. (1986). The strategic decision process and organizational structure. Academy of Management Review. 11(2): 280-297. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283101

  • Gichohi, P. M. (2014). The role of employee engagement in revitalizing creativity and innovation at the workplace: A survey of selected libraries in Meru County-Kenya. Library Philosophy and Practice, 0_1.

  • Hage, J. (1980). Theories of organizations. New York: Wiley.

  • Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967).Program change and organizational properties in a comparative analysis. American Journal of Sociology. 72(5): 503-519. https://doi.org/10.1086/224380

  • Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1970). Social change in complex organizations, 41, Random House Trade.

  • Heller, F. A., Pusic, E., Strauss, G., & Wilpert, B. (1998). Organizational participation: Myth and reality, 4, Oxford University Press.

  • Howard, H. (1977). The relationship between certain organizational variables and the rate of innovation in academic libraries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.

  • Khandwalla, P. N. (1977). The design of organizations. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York.

  • Lysonski, S., Levas, M., & Lavenka, N. (1995). Environmental uncertainty and Organizational Structure: A product management perspective. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 4(3): 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429510097609

  • McNulty, T., & Ferlie, E. (2004). Process transformation: Limitations to radical organizational change within public service organizations. Organization Studies, 25(8): 13891412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604046349

  • Menguc, B., and Auh, S. (2010). Development and return on the execution of product innovation capabilities: The role of organizational structure. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5): 820-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.08.004

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organization: A synthesis of the research. Prentice-Hall.

  • Paswan, A. K., Dant, R. P., & Lumpkin, J. R. (1998). An empirical investigation of the linkages among rationalism, environmental uncertainty, and bureaucratization. Journal of Business Research, 43(3): 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00218-X

  • Pierce, J. L., & Delbecq, A. L. (1977). Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 2(1): 27-37. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4409154

  • Prakash, Y., & Gupta, M. (2008). Exploring the relationship between organisation structure and perceived innovation in the manufacturing sector of India. Singapore Management Review, 30(1): 55.

  • Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1968). Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1): 65-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391262

  • Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1969).The context of organization structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1): 91-114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391366

  • Pugh, L. (2005). Managing 21st-century libraries. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press.

  • Robbins, S. P., & Barnwell, N. (2006). Organisation theory: Concepts and cases. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.

  • Rogers, E. M. 1983. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press

  • Rowley, J. (2011). Should your library have an innovation strategy?. Library Management. 32(4/5): 251-265. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121111132266

  • Sahay, Y. P., and Gupta, M. (2011). Role of organization structure in innovation in the bulk-drug industry. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations. 46(3): 450-464.

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behaviour: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal. 37(3): 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701

  • Shadur, M. A., Kienzle, R., & Rodwell, J. J. (1999). The relationship between organizational climate and employee perceptions of involvement: The importance of support. Group & Organization Management. 24(4): 479-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601199244005

  • Stoffle, C. J., Allen, B., Morden, D., & Maloney, K. (2003). Continuing to build the future: academic libraries and their challenges. Portal: Libraries and the Academy. 3(3): 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0068

  • Thompson, J. D. (2017). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315125930

  • Tom, B. & G. M., Stalker (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock: 104-08.

  • Walton, R. E. (1984). From control to commitment: transforming workforce management in the united states. Division of Research, Harvard Business School.

  • West, J. (2000). Institutions, information processing, and organization structure in research and development: evidence from the semiconductor industry. Research Policy. 29(3): 349-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00035-9

  • West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology. 51(3): 355-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00951

  • Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. John Wiley & Sons.


Abstract Views: 465

PDF Views: 9




  • The Effects of Dimensions of Organizational Structure on Innovation in Business School Libraries in India:An Empirical Study

Abstract Views: 465  |  PDF Views: 9

Authors

Champeswar Mishra
Tripura University (A Central University), Suryamaninagar (W), Agartala - 799 022, Tripura, India
Bulu Maharana
Department of Library and Information Science, Samabalpur University, Jyoti Vihar, Burla - 768019, Sambalpur, Odisha, India

Abstract


Purpose: In an intensely competitive and changing environment, innovation can be considered as a survival strategy. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of organization structure on innovation in business school libraries in India. Design/methodology/approach: The study focused on libraries of leading business schools, viz., IIMs,. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data for this study. The quantitative data were analyzed to test the hypothesis. Findings: The dimensions of organizational structure i.e., vertical complexity, employee participation and organizational complexity are positively related to innovation and have higher OS influence in innovation among business school libraries. On the other hand, increase in formalization, the degree of centralization and strict adherence to pre-defined roles and rigid rules in the organization are negatively related to innovation. Research Limitations: The study is limited to libraries of Indian Institutes of Management (IIM) India. Thus, other scientific and technical libraries are not in the ambit of this study. Originality/value: In India, there is no study conducted in academic management libraries. This study can be used as a guide for library administrators to accomplish the objectives of the organization by enabling innovation in the context of organizational structure.

Keywords


Academic Management Library, IIMs, Indian Management Schools, Library Innovation, Organizational Structure, Organizational Innovation, Structural Dimensions.

References