Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Knowledge Updating by Doctors of Academic and Research Institutions in Chennai: A Study


Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Madras, Guindy, Chennai – 600005, India
2 University Library, University of Madras, Guindy, Chennai – 600005, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Innovations in Information, Communication and Technology, have an impact in every domain. Updating knowledge becomes mandatory in the competitive environment. It is useful to study knowledge updating among doctors in academic and research institutions. Knowledge updating by doctors were analyzed based on impact of digital information, Purpose of updating knowledge, mode, method and time spent. The study has been carried out to identify the inquisitiveness among doctors of academic and research institutions in updating their knowledge. Further, the study also enables to identify the impact of digital information. A structured questionnaire was distributed among 605 faculty members of five private medical colleges in Chennai, roughly about 40% of the total faculty strength in each institution. The data were collected during August to December 2019. Out of 605 questionnaires distributed 497 were received. The response rate works out 82.15%. Nearly 82.3% of the respondents have indicated that the digital information has high impact.

Keywords

Academic and Research Institutions, Impact of Digital Environment, Medical Professionals, Updating Knowledge.
User
About The Authors

W. Godwin Rajesh
Department of Library and Information Science, University of Madras, Guindy, Chennai – 600005
India

R. Ambuja
University Library, University of Madras, Guindy, Chennai – 600005
India


Notifications

  • Choi, Y. and Rasmussen, E. (2009). What qualifications and skills are important for digital librarian positions in academic libraries? A job advertisement analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(5): 457-67. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2009.06.003

  • Dell-Price, C. and Cotton, Y. (2008). Assessing Information literacy skills within a core module. ALISS Quarterly, 3(3): 31-3.

  • Haglund, L. and Herron D. (2008). Students with nonproficient information seeking skills greatly over-estimate their abilities. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 3(2): 48-51. https://doi.org/10.18438/B84K7H.

  • Harris, L. E. (2007). When the negotiations begin listen carefully stayon point. Information Outlook, 11(3): 32-33.

  • Orme, V. (2008). You will be …: A study of job advertisements to determine employers’ requirements for LIS professionals in the UK in 2007. Library Review, 57(8): 619-633. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530810899595.

  • Owei, V., Bada, A, O. and Aniebonam, M. (2006). Addressing the information technology skills shortage in developing countries: tapping the pool of disabled users. Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society, 4(2): 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/14779960680000283.

  • Pinto, M. M. (2008). Cyber abstracts: APortal on the subject of abstracting designed to improve information literacy skills. Journal of Information Science, 34(5): 66779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507086262.

  • Ramesh Babu, B. (2011). Information Literacy skills for LIS Professionals. In: National Conference on Information Literacy Skills for college Librarians in Digital Environment. New Dellhi:Vayu Education of India; p. 3-16.

  • Ramesh Babu, B. and Nageswara Rao, P. (2011). Competencies and Skills for LIS Professionals in the context of Information Literacy and Digital Literacy. In: National Conference on Information Literacy Competencies for Higher Learning and Research organised by Tumkur University (Proceedings). Bangalore: Indian Academic Library Association; p. 254-262.

  • Thomas, P. and Ruttert, P. M. (2008). A computer literacy skills profile of pharmacists residing in two counties of England. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 25(4): 288-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14711842.2008.00767.x. PMid: 19076675.

  • Venkataraman, S., Gopalakrishnan, S. and Gopalakrishnan, S. (MIT) (2011). Knowledge sharing among library and information science professionals: A study. Journal of Current Trends in Education and Research, 3(2): 41-47.

  • Walker, A. S. (2008). Computer-assisted library instruction and face-to-face library instruction prove equally effective for teaching basic library skills in Academic Libraries. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 3(1): 57-60. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8B62P.

  • https://www.elsevier.com/connect/medical-knowledgedoublesevery-few-months-how-can-clinicians-keepupacademiclibraries. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice: An Overview, 3(1), 57-60. Accessed on 2nd May 2020.


Abstract Views: 298

PDF Views: 6




  • Knowledge Updating by Doctors of Academic and Research Institutions in Chennai: A Study

Abstract Views: 298  |  PDF Views: 6

Authors

W. Godwin Rajesh
Department of Library and Information Science, University of Madras, Guindy, Chennai – 600005, India
R. Ambuja
University Library, University of Madras, Guindy, Chennai – 600005, India

Abstract


Innovations in Information, Communication and Technology, have an impact in every domain. Updating knowledge becomes mandatory in the competitive environment. It is useful to study knowledge updating among doctors in academic and research institutions. Knowledge updating by doctors were analyzed based on impact of digital information, Purpose of updating knowledge, mode, method and time spent. The study has been carried out to identify the inquisitiveness among doctors of academic and research institutions in updating their knowledge. Further, the study also enables to identify the impact of digital information. A structured questionnaire was distributed among 605 faculty members of five private medical colleges in Chennai, roughly about 40% of the total faculty strength in each institution. The data were collected during August to December 2019. Out of 605 questionnaires distributed 497 were received. The response rate works out 82.15%. Nearly 82.3% of the respondents have indicated that the digital information has high impact.

Keywords


Academic and Research Institutions, Impact of Digital Environment, Medical Professionals, Updating Knowledge.

References