Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Workplace Design Factors, Well-Being, and Ergonomics Training - A Case for Indian Millennial Employee


Affiliations
1 AIMA-AMU, New Delhi – 110024, Delhi
2 Department of Business Administration, FMSR, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh – 202001, Uttar Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Ergonomics as a study of the workplace design to enhance business goals like productivity, and employee well-being, also involves adapting jobs and workplace to the worker. Ergonomics aims to provide working environment that minimizes the physical demands on the worker. Optimal workplace performance can be enhanced by incorporating psychological and cognitive aspects of human beings that is the ergonomics /human factor engineering. This study seeks to examine the physical conditions of a millennial employee’s workplace design factors and its impact on employee’s well-being. The ergonomic training will ease the stress amongst employees by informing them about possible harmful effects of incorrect postures and work-habits thereby enhancing employees’ perception of organizational support for employee well-being. This study attempts to understand the millennial employee’s preference for various workplace design factors to achieve their physical well-being. Primary data was collected using semi-structured interviews in a corporate in Delhi region, perception of workplace design and self-reported importance of Ergonomic training for their well-being was collected and analyzed.

Keywords

Millennial, Well-Being, Workplace Design Factors.
User
About The Authors

Shalini Singh
AIMA-AMU, New Delhi – 110024, Delhi

sachin.ecin@gmail.com

Ayesha Farooq
Department of Business Administration, FMSR, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh – 202001, Uttar Pradesh
India


Notifications

  • Adrian, L. and Bill, B. (1993). Building Design, Complexity and Manageability, Facilities, (9), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002256.

  • Benson, H. (2005). Are you working too hard? A conversation with mind/body, Harvard Business Review, 83(11): 53-58.

  • Clements-Croome, D. and Kaluarachchi, Y. (2000). Assessment and measurement of productivity. In: Clements - Croome, Derek (ed), Creating the Productive Workplace, E. & F.N. Spon, London; p. 129-162.

  • Ellis (1994). Occupiers’ Preferences. In: A Survey for Richard Ellis by the Harris Research Centre (ed), The Performance of the Workplace, Richard Ellis, London.

  • Froehlich, L. A. (2013). The Impact of Employee Well Being on Organizational Change. Dissertation, Benedictine University.

  • Heaphy, E. D. and Dutton, J. E. (2008). Positive social interactions and the human body at work: Linking organizations and physiology, The Academy of Management Review, (33), 137-162. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.27749365.

  • Marston, C. (2007). Motivating the “What’s in it for me?” workforce: Manage across the generational divide and increase profits. Hoboken, Wiley.

  • McManus, M. A. and Kelly, M. L. (1999). Personality measures and bio data: Evidence regarding their incremental predictive value in the life insurance industry, Personnel Psychology, (52), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb01817.x.

  • Singh, P., Rai, S. and Bhandarker, A. (2012). Millennials and the Workplace: Challenges for Architecting the Organizations of Tomorrow, SAGE Publications, New Delhi.

  • Srinivasan, V. (2012). Multi generations in the workforce: Building collaboration, IIMB Management Review, (24), 48-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2012.01.004.

  • Weiner, P. (1994). Architectural Record, May.

  • Wilkins, A. J. (1993). Health and efficiency in lighting practice, Energy, 18(2), 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(93)90096-V.


Abstract Views: 395

PDF Views: 9




  • Workplace Design Factors, Well-Being, and Ergonomics Training - A Case for Indian Millennial Employee

Abstract Views: 395  |  PDF Views: 9

Authors

Shalini Singh
AIMA-AMU, New Delhi – 110024, Delhi
Ayesha Farooq
Department of Business Administration, FMSR, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh – 202001, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


Ergonomics as a study of the workplace design to enhance business goals like productivity, and employee well-being, also involves adapting jobs and workplace to the worker. Ergonomics aims to provide working environment that minimizes the physical demands on the worker. Optimal workplace performance can be enhanced by incorporating psychological and cognitive aspects of human beings that is the ergonomics /human factor engineering. This study seeks to examine the physical conditions of a millennial employee’s workplace design factors and its impact on employee’s well-being. The ergonomic training will ease the stress amongst employees by informing them about possible harmful effects of incorrect postures and work-habits thereby enhancing employees’ perception of organizational support for employee well-being. This study attempts to understand the millennial employee’s preference for various workplace design factors to achieve their physical well-being. Primary data was collected using semi-structured interviews in a corporate in Delhi region, perception of workplace design and self-reported importance of Ergonomic training for their well-being was collected and analyzed.

Keywords


Millennial, Well-Being, Workplace Design Factors.

References