Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Altmetrics Linked Scholarly Information from Dimensions.ai Datasets for the Top 100 LIS Articles


Affiliations
1 Department of Studies and Research in Library and Information Science, Tumkur University, Tumakuru – 572103, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper examines the presence of Library and Information Science articles in social media platforms by considering the top 100 highly socially cited articles from the Dimensions database. The study examines the association between major metrics. Data were collected from Dimensions.ai, Altmetrics.com, WoS, Google Scholar, and analyzed. The findings suggest that all the 100 LIS articles have got at least one mention from nine different social media platforms with increased attention from Mendeley and Twitter. The article “Objectivity and realms of explanation in academic journal articles concerning sex/gender: a comparison of Gender studies and the other social sciences” authored by Therese Soderlund et al., has been the top socially cited article in Dimensions with an altmetricss attention score of 684. The study found a weak positive correlation between social media citation with major citations from Web of Science (r=0.19), Google Scholar(r=0.18) and Dimensions(r=0.19). This is the first of its kind study to measure the social media attention of LIS articles based on the Dimensions dataset and the result gives more insights to LIS authors for evaluating the societal impact of their research using altmetricss indicators.

Keywords

Altmetrics, Altmetrics Attention Score, Dimensions, Library and Information Science, Social Media Citation, Social Media Metrics, Web Citation.
User
About The Authors

C. Vysakh
Department of Studies and Research in Library and Information Science, Tumkur University, Tumakuru – 572103, Karnataka
India

H. Rajendra Babu
Department of Studies and Research in Library and Information Science, Tumkur University, Tumakuru – 572103, Karnataka
India


Notifications

  • Akella, A. P., Alhoori, H., Kondamudi, P. R., Freeman, C. and Zhou, H. (2020). Early indicators of scientific impact: Predicting citations with altmetricss. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101128.

  • Alhoori, H., Choudhury, S. R., Kanan, T., Furuta, R., Fox, E. A. and Giles, C. L. (2015). On the relationship between open access and altmetricss. Proceedings of the I Conference; p. 1-8.

  • Alhoori, H., Furuta, R., Tabet, M., Samaka, M. and Fox, E. A. (2014). Altmetricss for country-level research assessment. In ICADL, pp. 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12823-8_7.

  • Aung, H. H., Link, N. and Sara Aw, A. (2019). Investigating Familiarity and Usage of Traditional Metrics and Altmetricss. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24162.

  • Costas, R., Zahedi, Z. and Wouters, P. (2015). The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media: Large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 260-288. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2014- 0173.

  • Dimensions. (2021). Retrieved March 2, 2021, from https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?search_ mode=content&order=altmetrics.

  • Dixon, D. L. and Baker, W. L. (2020). Short-term impact of Altmetrics Attention Scores on citation counts in selected major pharmacy journals. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 3(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1141.

  • Erfanmanesh, M. (2017). Highly-alted articles in library and information science. Webology, 14(2), 66-77.

  • Erfanmanesh, M., Noorhidawati, A. and Abrizah, A. (2019). What can Bookmetrix tell us about the impact of Springer Nature’s books? Scientometrics, 121(1), 521-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03198-6.

  • Ezema Ifeanyi, J. and Ugwu, C. I. (2017). Measuring Research Impact of Library and Information Science Journals : Citation verses Altmetricss. IFLA Library, 1-10.

  • Ezema Ifeanyi, J. and Ugwu, C. I. (2019). Correlating research impact of library and information science journals using citation counts and altmetricss attention. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(3), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-08-2018-0029.

  • Galligan, F. and Dyas-Correi, S. (2013). Altmetricss: Rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2013.10765486

  • Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., Holmberg, K., Peters, I. and Larivière, V. (2014a). Astrophysicists on Twitter: An in-depth analysis of tweeting and scientific publication behaviour. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0081.

  • Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H. and Terliesner, J. (2014b). Coverage and adoption of altmetricss sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1145-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3.

  • Holmberg, K., Hedman, J., Bowman, T. D., Didegah, F. and Laakso, M. (2019). Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetrics activity than articles in subscription- based journals? An investigation of the research output of Finnish universities. Scientometrics, 122(1), 645- 659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03301-x.

  • Jane, C. (2017). A comparative study of the impact of Korean research articles in four academic fields using altmetricss. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-02-2016-0005.

  • Mohammadi, E. and Thelwall, M. (2013). Mendeley readership altmetricss for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23071.

  • Onyancha, O. B. (2017). Altmetricss of South African Journals: Implications for Scholarly Impact of South African Research. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(1), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9485-0.

  • Pooladian, A. and Borrego, Á. (2017). Twenty years of readership of library and information science literature under Mendeley’s microscope. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-02-2016-0006.

  • Rangaswamy and Babu, R. H. (2019a). An Altmetrics Analysis of Top Journals in Library and Information Science. In Digital technologies and Transformation in Academic Libraries (pp. 352-357). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11567901.

  • Rangaswamy and Babu, R. H. (2019b). An Altmetrics Analysis of Top Journals in Library and Information Science. In Digital technologies and Transformation in Academic Libraries (pp. 352-357). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11567901

  • Saberi, M. K. and Ekhtiyari, F. (2019). Usage, captures, mentions, social media and citations of LIS highly cited papers : an altmetricss study. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 20(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-10-2018-0025.

  • Shan, P., Juan, C. and Wolfgang, G. (2019). Comparing capture, usage and citation indicators: an altmetrics analysis of journal papers in chemistry disciplines. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1461-1473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03168-y.

  • Shenavar, A. and Abbas, D. (2020). Review of Iranian Journal Articles Indexed in Web of Science-Based on Altmetrics Indicators in Scientific Social Media. Webology, 17(1), 158-170. https://doi.org/10.14704/web/v17i1/a214.

  • Shrivastava, R. and Mahajan, P. (2017). An altmetrics analysis of ResearchGate profiles of physics researchers. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(1), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-07-2016-0033.

  • Siluo, Y. and Mengxue, Z. (2019). Performance of citations and altmetricss in the social sciences and humanities. In Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (pp. 326-335). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.69.

  • Syamili, C. and Rekha, R. V. (2017). Do altmetrics correlate with citation? : A study based on PLOS ONE journal. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 11(1), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2016.1260815.

  • Tang, Y., Tseng, H. and Vann, C. (2020). Unwrap citation count, Altmetrics Attention Score and Mendeley readership status of highly cited articles in the top-tier LIS journals. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 69(8-9), 653-664. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2020-0005.

  • Taylor, M. (2020). An altmetrics attention advantage for open access books in the humanities and social sciences. Scientometrics, 125(3), 2523-2543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03735-8.

  • Thelwall, M. (2018). Altmetrics Prevalence in the Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities: Where are the Online Discussions? Journal of Altmetricss, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.29024/joa.6.

  • Verma, S. and Madhusudhan, M. (2019). An altmetrics comparison of highly cited digital library publications of India and China. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 66(2), 71-75.

  • Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., Hill, S.,et al. (2015). The metric tide : Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473978782.


Abstract Views: 342

PDF Views: 4




  • Altmetrics Linked Scholarly Information from Dimensions.ai Datasets for the Top 100 LIS Articles

Abstract Views: 342  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

C. Vysakh
Department of Studies and Research in Library and Information Science, Tumkur University, Tumakuru – 572103, Karnataka, India
H. Rajendra Babu
Department of Studies and Research in Library and Information Science, Tumkur University, Tumakuru – 572103, Karnataka, India

Abstract


This paper examines the presence of Library and Information Science articles in social media platforms by considering the top 100 highly socially cited articles from the Dimensions database. The study examines the association between major metrics. Data were collected from Dimensions.ai, Altmetrics.com, WoS, Google Scholar, and analyzed. The findings suggest that all the 100 LIS articles have got at least one mention from nine different social media platforms with increased attention from Mendeley and Twitter. The article “Objectivity and realms of explanation in academic journal articles concerning sex/gender: a comparison of Gender studies and the other social sciences” authored by Therese Soderlund et al., has been the top socially cited article in Dimensions with an altmetricss attention score of 684. The study found a weak positive correlation between social media citation with major citations from Web of Science (r=0.19), Google Scholar(r=0.18) and Dimensions(r=0.19). This is the first of its kind study to measure the social media attention of LIS articles based on the Dimensions dataset and the result gives more insights to LIS authors for evaluating the societal impact of their research using altmetricss indicators.

Keywords


Altmetrics, Altmetrics Attention Score, Dimensions, Library and Information Science, Social Media Citation, Social Media Metrics, Web Citation.

References