Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Knowledge Sharing Practices, Innovation Strategy, and Knowledge Sharing behaviour: Role of Mutual Trust


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Central University of South Bihar (Gaya), Fatehpur – 824236, Bihar, India
2 Assistant Professor, Central University of Karnataka, Kadaganchi – 585367, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Knowledge sharing and mutual trust are culture-specific virtues and vital components for organizations’ success. In this research, we investigated the effect of Organizational Knowledge Sharing Practices (OKSP) and Innovation Strategy (IS) on Knowledge Sharing (KS) among Indian service sector employees. Moreover, moderating role of Mutual Trust (MT) between Organizational knowledge sharing practices, Innovation strategy, and Knowledge sharing was also examined on a sample of 150 service sector employees (Male = 112, Female = 38). The correlation results revealed that Organizational knowledge sharing practices and Innovation Strategy significantly and positively correlated with Knowledge Sharing dimensions- explicit knowledge sharing and tacit knowledge sharing. Furthermore, stepwise regression analyses to examine the moderating effect of Mutual trust revealed that Organizational knowledge sharing practices significantly predicted explicit knowledge sharing (β = .48; p<.01) and tacit knowledge sharing (β = .51; p<.01) in the group with high mutual trust. Thus, cultural traits and behaviors such as trust and knowledge sharing would be inculcated within organization practices to experience better psychological and organizational outcomes.

Keywords

Indian Service Sector, Innovation Strategy, Knowledge Sharing, Mutual Trust, Organizational Knowledge Sharing Practices
User
About The Authors

Narsingh Kumar
Assistant Professor, Central University of South Bihar (Gaya), Fatehpur – 824236, Bihar
India

Smriti Kumar
Assistant Professor, Central University of South Bihar (Gaya), Fatehpur – 824236, Bihar
India

Vijyendra Pandey
Assistant Professor, Central University of Karnataka, Kadaganchi – 585367, Karnataka
India


Notifications

  • Almahamid, S., Mcadams, A. C., & Kalaldeh, T. (2010). The Relationships among Organizational Knowledge Sharing Practices, Employees’ Learning Commitments, Employees’ Adaptability, and Employees’ Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Investigation of the Listed Manufacturing Companies in Jordan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge & Management, 5. https://doi.org/10.28945/1225.

  • Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial marketing management, 31(6): 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6.

  • Chen, C. J., Huang, J. W., & Hsiao, Y. C. (2010). Knowledge management and innovativeness: The role of organizational climate and structure. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721011088548.

  • Coakes, E. (2006). Storing and sharing knowledge: Supporting the management of knowledge made explicit in transnational organisations. The Learning Organization. https:// doi.org/10.1108/09696470610705460.

  • Creed, W. D., Miles, R. E., Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in organizations. Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, p. 16-38.

  • Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management science, 50(3): 352-364. https://doi.org/10.1287/ mnsc.1030.0134.

  • Demarest, M. (1997). Understanding knowledge management. Long range planning, 30(3): 374-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)90250-8.

  • El Said, G. R. (2015). Understanding Knowledge Management System antecedents of performance impact: Extending the Task-technology Fit Model with intention to share knowledge construct. Future Business Journal, 1(1-2): 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2015.11.003.

  • Endres, M. L., Endres, S. P., Chowdhury, S. K., & Alam, I. (2007). Tacit knowledge sharing, self‐efficacy theory, and application to the open source community. Journal of knowledge management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710752135.

  • Fisman, R., & Khanna, T. (1999). Is trust a historical residue? Information flows and trust levels. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38(1): 79-92. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00123-1.

  • Garvin DA. Building a learning organization. Harvard Bus Rev 1993 (July - August), p.78-91.

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Harvard business review, 72(4): 122-128.

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (2005). Strategic intent. Harvard business review, 83(7): 148-161.

  • Hashim, K. F., & Tan, F. B. (2015). The mediating role of trust and commitment on members’ continuous knowledge sharing intention: A commitment-trust theory perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2): 145-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.11.001.

  • Holsapple, C. W., & Joshi, K. D. (2000). An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2-3): 235-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963- 8687(00)00046-9.

  • Holste, J. S., & Fields, D. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of knowledge management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015615.

  • Hsu, H. Y. S. (2006). Knowledge management and intellectual capital. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-573-3.ch036 PMid:17050013.

  • Huang, Q., Davison, R. M., & Gu, J. (2011). The impact of trust, guanxi orientation and face on the intention of Chinese employees and managers to engage in peer‐to‐peer tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Information Systems Journal, 21(6): 557-577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2575.2010.00361.x.

  • Huie, C. P., Cassaberry, T., & Rivera, A. K. (2020). The Impact of Tacit Knowledge Sharing on Job Performance. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 2(1): 34-40.

  • Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2002). Knowledge sharing in Russian companies with Western participation. Management International, 6(2): 17-28.

  • Jackson, S. E., Chuang, C. H., Harden, E. E., & Jiang, Y. (2006). Toward developing human resource management systems for knowledge-intensive teamwork. In Research in personnel and human resources management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742- 7301(06)25002-3.

  • Karlsson, D., & Rodriguez, A. (2015). Knowledge sharing in an open innovation collaboration. In Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology.

  • Kremer, H., Villamor, I., & Aguinis, H. (2019). Innovation leadership: Best-practice recommendations for promoting employee creativity, voice, and knowledge sharing. Business Horizons, 62(1): 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bushor.2018.08.010.

  • Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of management information systems, 20(1): 179-228. https://doi.org/10.10 80/07421222.2003.11045756.

  • Lin, C. P. (2007). To share or not to share: Modeling tacit knowledge sharing, its mediators and antecedents. Journal of business ethics, 70(4): 411-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10551-006-9119-0.

  • Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International Journal of manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720710755272.

  • Luthra, P., & Palvia, P. (2006). Tug-Of-War in KM Projects: A Strategic Renewal Perspective.

  • Malhotra, Y. (2004). Why knowledge management systems fail: enablers and constraints of knowledge management in human enterprises. In Handbook on Knowledge Management 1 (pp. 577-599). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24746-3_30.

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press. https://doi. org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3.

  • Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. OUP Oxford. https://doi. org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199241002.001.0001.

  • O’Dell, C., & Grayson, C. J. (1999). Knowledge transfer: discover your value proposition. Strategy & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054630.

  • Polanyi, M. (1966), The Tacit Dimension, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

  • Pulakos, E. D., & Dorsey, D. W., and Borman, W. C., 2003. Hiring for knowledge-based competition, managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage: Designing strategies for effective human resource management, p.155- 177.

  • Reid, F. (2003). Creating a knowledge-sharing culture among diverse business units. Employment Relations Today, 30(3): 43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ert.10097.

  • Ryan, S. D., Windsor, J. C., Ibragimova, B., & Prybutok, V. R. (2010). Organizational practices that foster knowledge sharing: Validation across distinct national cultures. Informing Science, 13pp. https://doi.org/10.28945/1296.

  • Usoro, A., Sharratt, M. W., & Tsui, E. (2006). An investigation into trust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice. Computing and Information Systems, 10(1): 42.

  • Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human resource management review, 20(2): 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. hrmr.2009.10.001.

  • Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly, p. 35-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667


Abstract Views: 312

PDF Views: 4




  • Knowledge Sharing Practices, Innovation Strategy, and Knowledge Sharing behaviour: Role of Mutual Trust

Abstract Views: 312  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

Narsingh Kumar
Assistant Professor, Central University of South Bihar (Gaya), Fatehpur – 824236, Bihar, India
Smriti Kumar
Assistant Professor, Central University of South Bihar (Gaya), Fatehpur – 824236, Bihar, India
Vijyendra Pandey
Assistant Professor, Central University of Karnataka, Kadaganchi – 585367, Karnataka, India

Abstract


Knowledge sharing and mutual trust are culture-specific virtues and vital components for organizations’ success. In this research, we investigated the effect of Organizational Knowledge Sharing Practices (OKSP) and Innovation Strategy (IS) on Knowledge Sharing (KS) among Indian service sector employees. Moreover, moderating role of Mutual Trust (MT) between Organizational knowledge sharing practices, Innovation strategy, and Knowledge sharing was also examined on a sample of 150 service sector employees (Male = 112, Female = 38). The correlation results revealed that Organizational knowledge sharing practices and Innovation Strategy significantly and positively correlated with Knowledge Sharing dimensions- explicit knowledge sharing and tacit knowledge sharing. Furthermore, stepwise regression analyses to examine the moderating effect of Mutual trust revealed that Organizational knowledge sharing practices significantly predicted explicit knowledge sharing (β = .48; p<.01) and tacit knowledge sharing (β = .51; p<.01) in the group with high mutual trust. Thus, cultural traits and behaviors such as trust and knowledge sharing would be inculcated within organization practices to experience better psychological and organizational outcomes.

Keywords


Indian Service Sector, Innovation Strategy, Knowledge Sharing, Mutual Trust, Organizational Knowledge Sharing Practices

References