Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study of Subject Headings vs. User Generated Tags


Affiliations
1 DLIS, Jadavpur University, Kolkata − 700032, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


User-generated tagging or folksonomy is one of the most popular Web 2.0 applications and has attracted the interest of libraries and information centres, which has developed services that facilitate user community collaboration. In the digital environment, social tagging has the potential to overcome certain limitations of traditional subject headings. The main objectives of this research paper are to identify the scope of user-generated tags as compared to Subject Heading Lists and to explore the extent to which these user-generated tags can be used to enhance subject access. In this research paper, the problem is comparison between the Subject heading List and user generated tags. This work is an exploratory research and has followed a case study method. Five searches were performed in Library Thing using its Tag mash feature (essentially a keyword search of the user tag field) using 5 tags. After searching articles and interpreting all data, a comparison between the subject heading list and User-generated tags have been made.

Keywords

Folksonomy, Library Thing, Subject Heading List, Tagging, User-Generated Tags, World Cat.
User
About The Authors

Sonali Dutta
DLIS, Jadavpur University, Kolkata − 700032, West Bengal
India

Subarna Kumar Das
DLIS, Jadavpur University, Kolkata − 700032, West Bengal
India


Notifications

  • Adamich, T. (2014). The Sears List -- An Old Friend With A 21st Century Look. Library Media Connection, 32(4), 43.
  • Bateman, S. (2007) “Collaborative Tagging : Folksonomy, Metadata, Visualization, e-Learning, Thesis.” HARVEST, University of Saskatchewan, 1 Dec. 2007, https://harvest.usask.ca/handle/10388/etd-12112007-221606.
  • Ferris, A. M. (2018). Birth of a subject heading. Library Resources & Technical Services, 62(1), 16-27.
  • Hayman, S. (2007) “ FOLKSONOMIES AND TAGGING: New Developments in Social Bookmarking .” Ark Education, Ark Group Conference: Developing and Improving Classification Schemes, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?d oi=10.1.1.138.8884&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 16 Jan.2022.
  • Mas, M.D. (2012) “Intelligent Interface Architectures for Folksonomy Driven Structure Network,” 2012 Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems, 2012, pp. 519-525, https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2012.158
  • Petek, M. (2012). Comparing user-generated and librarian-generated metadata on digital images. OCLC Systems and Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 28(2), 101 -111. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650751211236659.
  • Rolla, P. (2009). User Tags versus Subject Headings. Library Resources & Technical Services, 53(3), 174-184. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.53n3.174
  • Samadder, H. (2019). Subject Heading List Vs User-Generated Tags: A Case Study (dissertation). Rabindra Bharati University, Kolkata, West Bengal.
  • West, W (2013). Tag, You’re IT: Enhancing Access to Graphic Novels. Portal: Libraries and the academy, 13(3), 301-324

Abstract Views: 180

PDF Views: 5




  • A Study of Subject Headings vs. User Generated Tags

Abstract Views: 180  |  PDF Views: 5

Authors

Sonali Dutta
DLIS, Jadavpur University, Kolkata − 700032, West Bengal, India
Subarna Kumar Das
DLIS, Jadavpur University, Kolkata − 700032, West Bengal, India

Abstract


User-generated tagging or folksonomy is one of the most popular Web 2.0 applications and has attracted the interest of libraries and information centres, which has developed services that facilitate user community collaboration. In the digital environment, social tagging has the potential to overcome certain limitations of traditional subject headings. The main objectives of this research paper are to identify the scope of user-generated tags as compared to Subject Heading Lists and to explore the extent to which these user-generated tags can be used to enhance subject access. In this research paper, the problem is comparison between the Subject heading List and user generated tags. This work is an exploratory research and has followed a case study method. Five searches were performed in Library Thing using its Tag mash feature (essentially a keyword search of the user tag field) using 5 tags. After searching articles and interpreting all data, a comparison between the subject heading list and User-generated tags have been made.

Keywords


Folksonomy, Library Thing, Subject Heading List, Tagging, User-Generated Tags, World Cat.

References