Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Digital Access Brokers: Clustering and Comparison (Part II – from Summarization to Citation Map)


Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, Department of Library Information Science, University of Calcutta, West Bengal, India
2 Professor, Department of Library Information Science, University of Kalyani, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In our previous article (Digital Access Brokers: clustering and comparison (Part I - locator services), we covered a total of twelve browser extensions under one broad group viz. Group A- Locations, Citations & References. This paper covers another twenty-two more browser extensions under four major groups viz. Group B- Summarizers, Recommenders & Commenters; Group C- Multi Functional; Group D - Resource Integration; and Group E- Citation Map Builder. All of these tools assist researchers in a variety of ways in obtaining content, both open-access and licenced content owned by various publishers or databases.

Keywords

Browser Extension, Digital Access Broker, Google Scholar Button, Kopernio, Lazy Scholar, Lean Library.
User
About The Authors

Bijan Kumar Roy
Associate Professor, Department of Library Information Science, University of Calcutta, West Bengal
India

Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay
Professor, Department of Library Information Science, University of Kalyani, West Bengal
India


Notifications

  • Ferguson, C. L. (2019). Leaning into browser extensions. Serials Review, 45(1-2), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 0987913.2019.1624909.
  • Hoy, M. B. (2019). New tools for finding full-text articles faster: Kopernio, Nomad, Unpaywall, and More. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 38(3), 287-292. https://doi. org/10.1080/02763869.2019.1629215. PMid:31379291.
  • Hupe, M. (2020). Lean library. Journal of Medical Library Association, 108(3), 518-519. https://doi.org/10.5195/ jmla.2020.976. PMid:32843883 PMCid:PMC7441912
  • Piwowar, H., et al. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. Peer J, 6. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375. PMid:29456894 PMCid:PMC5815332.
  • Wang, X., et al. (2015). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, 103(2), 555-564. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0.https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0.

Abstract Views: 296

PDF Views: 4




  • Digital Access Brokers: Clustering and Comparison (Part II – from Summarization to Citation Map)

Abstract Views: 296  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

Bijan Kumar Roy
Associate Professor, Department of Library Information Science, University of Calcutta, West Bengal, India
Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay
Professor, Department of Library Information Science, University of Kalyani, West Bengal, India

Abstract


In our previous article (Digital Access Brokers: clustering and comparison (Part I - locator services), we covered a total of twelve browser extensions under one broad group viz. Group A- Locations, Citations & References. This paper covers another twenty-two more browser extensions under four major groups viz. Group B- Summarizers, Recommenders & Commenters; Group C- Multi Functional; Group D - Resource Integration; and Group E- Citation Map Builder. All of these tools assist researchers in a variety of ways in obtaining content, both open-access and licenced content owned by various publishers or databases.

Keywords


Browser Extension, Digital Access Broker, Google Scholar Button, Kopernio, Lazy Scholar, Lean Library.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17821/srels%2F2022%2Fv59i6%2F170786