Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Text-borrowing Practices in LIS Doctoral Theses of South Indian Universities: A Study


Affiliations
1 UGC-Senior Research Fellow, Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysuru – 570006, Karnataka, India
2 Professor, Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysuru – 570006, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper reports the findings of the study, which examined the text copying practices prevalent among the Ph.D. theses in Library and Information Science (LIS) submitted to South India’s universities. Ten theses available in the Shodhganga repository have been tested for text-borrowing practices. Turnitin, a plagiarism detection software, has been used to identify the text matches in theses, and the plagiarised portions are manually analyzed with original sources. The findings indicate that LIS doctoral theses borrow words up to 30% without proper citations. Copying text from other sources and presenting without appropriate citation modalities (Sham plagiarism) is found to be common among the South Indian Ph.D. theses. Direct plagiarism type is less compared to inappropriate paraphrasing.

Keywords

Ph.D. Theses, Plagiarism, Text Borrowing, Text Similarity.
User
About The Authors

Chikku Balachandran
UGC-Senior Research Fellow, Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysuru – 570006, Karnataka
India

N. S. Harinarayana
Professor, Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysuru – 570006, Karnataka
India


Notifications

  • Amsberry, D. (2010). Deconstructing plagiarism: International students and textual borrowing practices. Reference Librarian, 51(1), 31-44. https://doi. org/10.1080/02763870903362183

  • Aspura, M. K. Y. I., Noorhidawati, A., and Abrizah, A. (2018). An analysis of Malaysian retracted papers: Misconduct or mistakes? Scientometrics, 115(3), 1315-1328. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2720-z

  • Chao, C., Wilhelm, W. J., and Neureuther, B. D. (2009). A study of electronic detection and pedagogical approaches for reducing plagiarism. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 51(1), 31-42.

  • Cheema, Z., Mahmood, S., Mahmood, A., and Shah, M. (2011). Conceptual awareness of research scholars about plagiarism at higher education level: Intellectual property right and patent. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 666-672.

  • Halupa, C., and Bolliger, D. U. (2015). Student perceptions of self-plagiarism: A multi-university exploratory study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(1), 91-105. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10805-015-9228-4

  • Hexham, I. (1992). The Plague of plagiarism: Academic plagiarism defined. Originally published as on Plagiarism and Integrity. Humanist: Humanities Computing, 5, 4.

  • Ison, D. (2014). Does the online environment promote plagiarism? A comparative study of dissertations from brick-and-mortar versus online Institutions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 272-282.

  • Kumar, P. K. S. (2019). Similarity index of doctoral theses submitted to universities in Kerala: An investigation. Library Philosophy and Practice.

  • Lambert, L. R. (2014). Occurrence of plagiarism in the writing of international graduate business students and its detection by Safeassign. University of Illinois.

  • Marshall, T., Taylor, B., Hothersall, E., and Pérez-Martín, L. (2011). Plagiarism: A case study of quality improvement in a taught postgraduate programme. Medical Teacher, 33(7), 375-381. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421 59X.2011.579201

  • Mayes, R. J. (2017). A content originality analysis of HRD focused dissertations and published academic articles using Turnitin plagiarism detection software. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. University of North Texas.

  • Murray, S. L., Henslee, A. M., and Ludlow, D. K. (2010). Evaluating engineering students ’ understanding of plagiarism. Quality Approaches in Higher Education, 7(1), 5-11.

  • O’Connor, S. J. (2010). What do duplicate publications; self‐plagiarism and the monotony of endless descriptive studies signify: Publication pressures or simply a collective lack of imagination? European Journal of Cancer Care, 19(3), 281-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2354.2010.01192.x

  • Oshima, A., and Hogue, A. (1999). Writing Academic English. Addison Wesley.

  • Pecorari, D., and Petric, B. (2014). Plagiarism in secondlanguage writing. Language Teaching, 47(3), 269-302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000056

  • Shodhganga. (2018). Shodhganga. Available from: https:// shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/

  • Sun, Y. C., and Yang, F. Y. (2015). Uncovering published authors’ text-borrowing practices: Paraphrasing strategies, sources, and self-plagiarism. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 224-236. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.003

  • UGC. (2016). UGC Minimum standards and procedure for award of MPhil. Ph.D Degrees Regulations. (pp. 7–12).

  • UGC. (2018). Promotion of academic integrity and prevention of plagiarism in higher educational institutions regulation.

  • Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: Researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41-59. https://doi. org/10.1080/03075070902912994


Abstract Views: 106

PDF Views: 2




  • Text-borrowing Practices in LIS Doctoral Theses of South Indian Universities: A Study

Abstract Views: 106  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Chikku Balachandran
UGC-Senior Research Fellow, Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysuru – 570006, Karnataka, India
N. S. Harinarayana
Professor, Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysuru – 570006, Karnataka, India

Abstract


This paper reports the findings of the study, which examined the text copying practices prevalent among the Ph.D. theses in Library and Information Science (LIS) submitted to South India’s universities. Ten theses available in the Shodhganga repository have been tested for text-borrowing practices. Turnitin, a plagiarism detection software, has been used to identify the text matches in theses, and the plagiarised portions are manually analyzed with original sources. The findings indicate that LIS doctoral theses borrow words up to 30% without proper citations. Copying text from other sources and presenting without appropriate citation modalities (Sham plagiarism) is found to be common among the South Indian Ph.D. theses. Direct plagiarism type is less compared to inappropriate paraphrasing.

Keywords


Ph.D. Theses, Plagiarism, Text Borrowing, Text Similarity.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17821/srels%2F2023%2Fv60i4%2F171089